HomerJay Posted February 23, 2009 Posted February 23, 2009 ive always rated upson, but thought he was poor on saturday.
MickyD Posted February 23, 2009 Posted February 23, 2009 ive always rated upson, but thought he was poor on saturday. I always wonder about the origins of surnames. We know that Coopers were manufacturers of barrells for the brewing industry, Wrights are fixers of things (Cartwright, Wainwright, etc.), Fletchers made arrows, How the f?ck did matthew's forebears get the name Up Son?
frank_spencer Posted February 23, 2009 Posted February 23, 2009 I always wonder about the origins of surnames. We know that Coopers were manufacturers of barrells for the brewing industry, Wrights are fixers of things (Cartwright, Wainwright, etc.), Fletchers made arrows, How the f?ck did matthew's forebears get the name Up Son? Matthew Son of Up? What an Up does i've no idea though
Rembrandt Posted February 23, 2009 Posted February 23, 2009 (edited) "Many Premier League managers might suggest that what Davies is good at doing treads a line that frequently borders on the illegal and that numerous international referees would quickly be reaching for their red cards if he ever played for England." Guardian See that's what gets me so p*ssed off with the national media & their hangers-on - their football reporters are so ignorant. This guy has obviously not noticed, or forgotten, that Kev D played a significant part in BW's two UEFA Cup campaigns of 18 matches - and no red card. Probably not much in the way of yellows either. But then he gets all wet and pretends it's not his view by saying "Many Premier League managers might suggest ...". Wimp ! I'd go so far as to say that the continental referees were generally far more understanding of our British style of play than most Prem refs - and certainly a lot less pre-judging. Still, the Guardian's report is no match for the one-eyed cockernee sparrer who wrote the match report for the Times. Edited February 23, 2009 by Rembrandt
Zulu Posted February 23, 2009 Posted February 23, 2009 (edited) they really are a set of c?nts Says it all, not many fans for a premier league club should not happen. Personally i reckon the premier league should have a rule saying if a club can't get an attendence of 75%, then they should be deducted points. The lower the attendence the worse the atmosphere, and this takes away a joy of going to watch a game. Also bolton has a 28 000 stadium, which should not be that hard to fill up, espically in the premier league Official attendance 21,245. 75% of 28,000 is 21,000. I'm guessing he was seeing his probation officer when they did percentages. A complete bunch of twats. Edited February 23, 2009 by Zulu
no balls Posted February 23, 2009 Posted February 23, 2009 I'd go so far as to say that the continental referees were generally far more understanding of our British style of play than most Prem refs - and certainly a lot less pre-judging. Going completely off topic here, I thought that throughout our 2 campaigns and couldn't understand why they were of a much better standard than our alledgedly elite refs. That is a good reason why.
Chris T. Church Posted February 23, 2009 Posted February 23, 2009 Still, the Guardian's report is no match for the one-eyed cockernee sparrer who wrote the match report for the Times. That guy wants stringing up for being so one sided. This is cheered me up after reading that load of crap though: http://timesonline.typepad.com/thegame/200...rs-bring-m.html Particularly like the image of that bird walking out, shame on her!
HomerJay Posted February 23, 2009 Posted February 23, 2009 That guy wants stringing up for being so one sided. This is cheered me up after reading that load of crap though: http://timesonline.typepad.com/thegame/200...rs-bring-m.html Particularly like the image of that bird walking out, shame on her! sorry for bringing i up AGAIN, but we had about 2000 fans walk out with 5mins to go, when we were 2-1 up and clinging on to 3 points. just cant get my head around it...
jolly-olly Posted February 23, 2009 Posted February 23, 2009 I wanted this set of pricks to go down but come to think of it, it would be better if they stayed in this league as we always get easy points against them. Set of deluded pricks. They are from the slums of the capital and really are a set of depressing, boring cu nts.
Gonk Posted February 23, 2009 Posted February 23, 2009 That guy wants stringing up for being so one sided. This is cheered me up after reading that load of crap though: http://timesonline.typepad.com/thegame/200...rs-bring-m.html Particularly like the image of that bird walking out, shame on her! and crampo was there too.......
Carlos Posted February 25, 2009 Posted February 25, 2009 Quality entertainment: http://www.eastlondonadvertiser.co.uk/cont...3A49%3A09%3A497
tkonion Posted February 25, 2009 Posted February 25, 2009 They are a great blow job? i don't fucking know what do you want me to say? Greenys a good keeper and had 2 bad games all year (both against you lot) Upson would walk into your side...end of and CC fuck knows prob coz no other cunt is fit!!? by the way been told today im up your way soon (21st March)_ BLACKBURN AWAY.....WHAT SHOULD I PACK/jabs ETC? Banjo plectrums and six fingered gloves should help win over the locals if you get into any scrapes.
Traf Posted February 25, 2009 Posted February 25, 2009 Quality entertainment: http://www.eastlondonadvertiser.co.uk/cont...3A49%3A09%3A497 And from the same source: http://www.eastlondonadvertiser.co.uk/cont...3A23%3A23%3A553
tyldesley_white Posted February 25, 2009 Posted February 25, 2009 And from the same source: http://www.eastlondonadvertiser.co.uk/cont...3A23%3A23%3A553 They are still trotting out they rough us up bit again I see, didn't see any off that shit in the press when we were on out losing streak I wounder why
Carlos Posted February 25, 2009 Posted February 25, 2009 They shouldn't even be in this league, and that is a double ITK FACT with a cherry on top.
Casino Posted February 26, 2009 Posted February 26, 2009 3 worst fouls in the game noble on puygrenier upson on davies collins on elmander and that is another fact with an even bigger cherry on top
Carlos Posted February 26, 2009 Posted February 26, 2009 I've found some footage to cheer us up, WHU's mob being smashed all over the place by Columbus Crew http://soccer.fanhouse.com/2008/07/23/west...was-quite-lame/
Rembrandt Posted February 26, 2009 Posted February 26, 2009 A bit off topic but .... I turned over to the Boro V Hammers cup replay last night. Boro had taken an early 2-0 lead. I noticed that when West Ham had possession around their own area, Boro often had 3-4 players in the West Ham half defending and closing down. West Ham never really got any attacking rhythm going. Just wondering about how that contrasts with us defending our own area so deeply last Saturday. Again.
passmosster Posted February 26, 2009 Posted February 26, 2009 Still, the Guardian's report is no match for the one-eyed cockernee sparrer who wrote the match report for the Times. We used to get some of the best reporting in the old days in the Manchester Guardian. Just proves how our culture is dominated to-day by Thames Estuary English speaking Michael Barrymore look alikes. Dear old Eric Todd must be rolling in his grave. I remember he wrote a whole long paragraph on one of Wyn Davies's headed goals.
WHUJOHN11 Posted February 26, 2009 Author Posted February 26, 2009 What is a Shithouse ? is it a toilet?
no balls Posted February 26, 2009 Posted February 26, 2009 What is a Shithouse ? is it a toilet? Indeed. Have you never heard the saying: He's got eyes like a shithouse rat?
Casino Posted February 26, 2009 Posted February 26, 2009 A bit off topic but ....I turned over to the Boro V Hammers cup replay last night. Boro had taken an early 2-0 lead. I noticed that when West Ham had possession around their own area, Boro often had 3-4 players in the West Ham half defending and closing down. West Ham never really got any attacking rhythm going. Just wondering about how that contrasts with us defending our own area so deeply last Saturday. Again. that the boro who are considered by most to be absolutely shite? please don't suggest we should be taking any tips from them
BWFCOLINH58 Posted February 26, 2009 Posted February 26, 2009 hats off tert hammers, good following at boro
Rembrandt Posted February 26, 2009 Posted February 26, 2009 that the boro who are considered by most to be absolutely shite? please don't suggest we should be taking any tips from them Why not, Cas ? Don't be so blinkered. Sure Boro are shite, and yet despite that they contained West Ham last night for a 2-0 win better than we did last weekend. Got to be something worth considering there, is all I'm saying.
Recommended Posts