Jump to content
Wanderers Ways. Neil Thompson 1961-2021

Recommended Posts

  • Site Supporter
Posted
2 hours ago, Sweep said:

Quite rightly as well these shitty little enclaves like the Falklands and Gibraltar should be given back to those who they belong to

2 hours ago, Zico said:

and Northern Ireland

And Guernsey, Jersey,  Alderney, Sark, Herm. And Isle of Man, I’m fairly sure Vikings won Man fair and square. Shall we do a deal throw Scotland in?

Posted
12 minutes ago, MickyD said:

And Guernsey, Jersey,  Alderney, Sark, Herm. And Isle of Man, I’m fairly sure Vikings won Man fair and square. Shall we do a deal throw Scotland in?

Yes, and Liverpool 

Posted
4 hours ago, Not in Crawley said:

this is how I imagine a BBQ round Boltys ends up after a few ciders.

 

This will be one of those videos where the subtitles are edited for decades after this. Similar to the film where Hitler has a meltdown at the end of the war. 

Posted
4 hours ago, MickyD said:

And Guernsey, Jersey,  Alderney, Sark, Herm. And Isle of Man, I’m fairly sure Vikings won Man fair and square. Shall we do a deal throw Scotland in?

Can people stop talking about the 'vikings' without any understanding of their history or the Anglo Saxons?

The basic idiocy makes my teeth itch. 

Read a fucking history book - there are loads.

  • Site Supporter
Posted
8 hours ago, Not in Crawley said:

Can people stop talking about the 'vikings' without any understanding of their history or the Anglo Saxons?

The basic idiocy makes my teeth itch. 

Read a fucking history book - there are loads.

OMG, Wandersways poster posts an unfactual joke. 

Shock, horror! 

Anyway.  Educate me. 

Posted
3 minutes ago, Nowack said:

I`m guessing its to do with the fact that Vikings are not a people or a tribe etc.

that's what I assumed he was getting at

Posted
20 minutes ago, Nowack said:

I`m guessing its to do with the fact that Vikings are not a people or a tribe etc.

Aye, Tony Curtis looked nowt like Kirk Douglas! Fun fact - the latter was born Issur Danielovitch but changed his name to the capital of the IOM as he was a big fan of the TT races.

  • Site Supporter
Posted
3 hours ago, Nowack said:

I`m guessing its to do with the fact that Vikings are not a people or a tribe etc.

Possibly not but years of acceptance of Viking being accepted and used to describe a member of a Scandinavian raiding party makes it ok for me to upset NiC by misusing the term.

But because NiC called me out for being wrong I’ve ended up doing a tiny bit of research of my own. I’ve found this page but can’t actually see their terminology being any different to mine.

https://theconversation.com/what-does-the-word-viking-really-mean-75647

Posted (edited)

 

18 minutes ago, MickyD said:

Possibly not but years of acceptance of Viking being accepted and used to describe a member of a Scandinavian raiding party makes it ok for me to upset NiC by misusing the term.

But because NiC called me out for being wrong I’ve ended up doing a tiny bit of research of my own. I’ve found this page but can’t actually see their terminology being any different to mine.

https://theconversation.com/what-does-the-word-viking-really-mean-75647

Ffs a tiny bit of research is no good. Go and read a book. 🙄😉

Edited by royal white
Posted
5 minutes ago, Not in Crawley said:

Quite right.

I've got River Kings on order for xmas, can't wait to get stuck into it.

https://www.waterstones.com/book/river-kings/cat-jarman/9780008353117

Cat Jarman is one of my favourite historians, her eposiodes on Gone Medieval are really interesting.

And what if Cats versions of events differs from other historians on the same topic? Who’s right and who’s wrong? 

  • Site Supporter
Posted
7 minutes ago, royal white said:

And what if Cats versions of events differs from other historians on the same topic? Who’s right and who’s wrong? 

That’s a great point. When two historians give conflicting versions which one is right?

Posted
10 minutes ago, MickyD said:

That’s a great point. When two historians give conflicting versions which one is right?

The one that hasn’t made it up. 
 

 

Posted
19 minutes ago, royal white said:

And what if Cats versions of events differs from other historians on the same topic? Who’s right and who’s wrong? 

That's the great point of history, for examle someone like Hobsbawn or E.P Thompson and the CPGM historians group will differ in certain readings from say a Niall Ferguson.

However Jarman's book isn't an arguement from a political readings/context - its a simply a telling of the facts, the fact is The Viking's were not just one homogenus group from Scandinavia. She's not saying there were Viking tribes in the middle east because she is left wing for example.

Anyway, must go I'm in a recording studio with Mica Paris doing some filming. I know it's an illness 😉

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.