Traf Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago Getting a load of councils run by Reform & the Greens so far away from a General Election will probably help the main parties further down the line. In two years time, when they've made an absolute fuck-up of running councils (like Reform are on the way to doing already), they'll have made themselves unelectable. Quote
jmjhb Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago (edited) Local/council elections have always been and remain utterly irrelevant compared to the HoC. Edited 5 hours ago by jmjhb Quote
Sweep Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 2 minutes ago, jmjhb said: Local/council elections have always been and remain utterly irrelevant I agree, nobody gives a fuck about them usually - but the narrative/hype around these is very different - and Reform and Greens will make huge noise about taking over councils As @Traf says, too much success could be to their detriment, if they make a pigs ear of running these councils, as we all know Reform are, at present Quote
Tonge moor green jacket Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 15 minutes ago, Sweep said: I agree, nobody gives a fuck about them usually - but the narrative/hype around these is very different - and Reform and Greens will make huge noise about taking over councils As @Traf says, too much success could be to their detriment, if they make a pigs ear of running these councils, as we all know Reform are, at present They're not making a pigs ear of them as you put it. Some aren't being run well, others are. Exactly as happens with any party. Which adds to my belief that councils shouldn't be run on party political grounds. Simply needs good people with knowledge of a particular area that they can bring to work for the people of their town. Reform will gain more councillors here in Bolton, but not enough to become a majority, so will have little opportunity to change anything. Quote
BobyBrno Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago (edited) The people of Birmingham might have a different view about these local elections. Edited 4 hours ago by BobyBrno Quote
Sweep Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 41 minutes ago, Tonge moor green jacket said: They're not making a pigs ear of them as you put it. Some aren't being run well, others are. I guess you're right, of course, because it's Reform, the ones that aren't being run well are always highlighted in the press, as a way of attempting to discredit them I agree, local councils would probably be much better, if they weren't run on political grounds - I don't know, or indeed care, who runs my local council, I've never voted in local elections, and we don't even have local elections here this May, for some reason Quote
Cheese Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 47 minutes ago, Tonge moor green jacket said: Which adds to my belief that councils shouldn't be run on party political grounds. At least then you'd have a valid complaint about "unelected bureaucrats". Quote
Duck Egg Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago After all the flag waving, most Councils are run by good people trying to do the best with what they've got. It's all the boring stuff e.g can we manage with less school crossing patrols in order to keep a library open? I'm grateful there are folk out there willing to sit in interminable meetings, whatever their political persuasion. Not something I'd fancy. Quote
frank_spencer Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 23 minutes ago, Duck Egg said: After all the flag waving, most Councils are run by good people trying to do the best with what they've got. It's all the boring stuff e.g can we manage with less school crossing patrols in order to keep a library open? I'm grateful there are folk out there willing to sit in interminable meetings, whatever their political persuasion. Not something I'd fancy. It's the dull legalese that means Reform haven't been able to deliver the massive cuts they thought they would in the councils they control. Council services have been cut to the bone for the last 15 years. Council budgets just deliver the minimum stuff they have to buy law every thing else comes from individual grants applied for scheme by scheme. Quote
Sweep Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 27 minutes ago, Duck Egg said: After all the flag waving, most Councils are run by good people trying to do the best with what they've got. It's all the boring stuff e.g can we manage with less school crossing patrols in order to keep a library open? I'm grateful there are folk out there willing to sit in interminable meetings, whatever their political persuasion. Not something I'd fancy. I've always wondered what sort of person actually wants to work on a town council, I don't think it really pays very much. I guess if you want to move into proper politics, and become and MP, it's a good grounding, but other than that, I'd imagine sitting in meetings and talking about the merits of either planting some new bulbs v painting a new pedestrian crossing must be pretty grim. Although, I'm not remotely community minded, I suppose those who are may find it interesting/rewarding Quote
DirtySanchez Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 46 minutes ago, Sweep said: I guess you're right, of course, because it's Reform, the ones that aren't being run well are always highlighted in the press, as a way of attempting to discredit them I agree, local councils would probably be much better, if they weren't run on political grounds - I don't know, or indeed care, who runs my local council, I've never voted in local elections, and we don't even have local elections here this May, for some reason I wouldn't have a clue who runs ours I've lived in an area which had a staunch Tory Council and a Labour one elsewhere Can't say one was better than the other Quote
Duck Egg Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 7 minutes ago, Sweep said: I've always wondered what sort of person actually wants to work on a town council, I don't think it really pays very much. I guess if you want to move into proper politics, and become and MP, it's a good grounding, but other than that, I'd imagine sitting in meetings and talking about the merits of either planting some new bulbs v painting a new pedestrian crossing must be pretty grim. Although, I'm not remotely community minded, I suppose those who are may find it interesting/rewarding Aye, you'd not get rich doing it. In my experience they fall into 3 types. Them that just want to do good in their community, Egotists and those who dream of getting in the HoC one day. Quote
frank_spencer Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 1 hour ago, Duck Egg said: Aye, you'd not get rich doing it. In my experience they fall into 3 types. Them that just want to do good in their community, Egotists and those who dream of getting in the HoC one day. The middle ones are a right pain in the arse. They'll turn up when the BEN are around but can't get them to do the day job for love or money, or they love to spout off in the BEN but don't have any interest in paying attention to the answer as they've been seen to be anti whatever the latest bugbear is. Quote
mickbrown Posted 29 minutes ago Posted 29 minutes ago 3 hours ago, Sweep said: I've always wondered what sort of person actually wants to work on a town council, I don't think it really pays very much. I guess if you want to move into proper politics, and become and MP, it's a good grounding, but other than that, I'd imagine sitting in meetings and talking about the merits of either planting some new bulbs v painting a new pedestrian crossing must be pretty grim. Although, I'm not remotely community minded, I suppose those who are may find it interesting/rewarding The same sort of prick who wants to be a referee. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.