Jump to content
Wanderers Ways. Neil Thompson 1961-2021

Recommended Posts

Posted

I expect SS will pick the same team & it's harsh to make changes or drop anyone after just one game, but i'd be tempted to start with Randall who was miles better than McAtee when he came on at Stockport .

Posted
23 minutes ago, bolton va va said:

I expect SS will pick the same team & it's harsh to make changes or drop anyone after just one game, but i'd be tempted to start with Randall who was miles better than McAtee when he came on at Stockport .

My Mums had two knee replacements and is 85, shed play better than McAtee! I just get what he brings to the team.

Posted
2 hours ago, bolton va va said:

I expect SS will pick the same team & it's harsh to make changes or drop anyone after just one game, but i'd be tempted to start with Randall who was miles better than McAtee when he came on at Stockport .

If he’s fit I’d play Warren in front of both of them.

Posted

I really don't get why folk get so invested in what the team will be.

It'll be 11 decent players, in their natural positions generally, with back up on the bench.

How they perform on the day is in the lap of the gods (and opposition and the bleedin ref) but win or lose it won't be down to picking the "wrong" team, there isn't a fit player in the squad that I wouldn't be happy to see in the team.  We don't have an Etete, or Dan or even a Williams or Arfield.

BWFC v Plymouth on Saturday, who cares who plays.

Posted
13 minutes ago, Johnnyrotten said:

I really don't get why folk get so invested in what the team will be.

It'll be 11 decent players, in their natural positions generally, with back up on the bench.

How they perform on the day is in the lap of the gods (and opposition and the bleedin ref) but win or lose it won't be down to picking the "wrong" team, there isn't a fit player in the squad that I wouldn't be happy to see in the team.  We don't have an Etete, or Dan or even a Williams or Arfield.

BWFC v Plymouth on Saturday, who cares who plays.

I dont care who plays, as long as we win!

Posted
1 hour ago, Johnnyrotten said:

I really don't get why folk get so invested in what the team will be.

It'll be 11 decent players, in their natural positions generally, with back up on the bench.

How they perform on the day is in the lap of the gods (and opposition and the bleedin ref) but win or lose it won't be down to picking the "wrong" team, there isn't a fit player in the squad that I wouldn't be happy to see in the team.  We don't have an Etete, or Dan or even a Williams or Arfield.

BWFC v Plymouth on Saturday, who cares who plays.

The problem is we've had the last 3 years of Evatt shoe horning anyone possible into a back 5. We've now got a squad that has 2 natural options for most positions, as normal clubs would have, so it's a novelty for us to speculate.

Give it a few weeks and it'll calm down to the players who are in form

Posted
1 hour ago, Stig said:

The problem is we've had the last 3 years of Evatt shoe horning anyone possible into a back 5. We've now got a squad that has 2 natural options for most positions, as normal clubs would have, so it's a novelty for us to speculate.

Give it a few weeks and it'll calm down to the players who are in form

Yes, there's 2 players per position on the whole (except striker currently), and they are all good players.  Unless SS picked Forino on the right wing and McAtee at left back, I honestly don't care who gets the nod, I trust SS.

I didn't trust IE either in the transfer market or with his selections.

As for it settling down when players are in form, I presume you mean if we're winning 😀  If not, it never settles down, we'll be clamouring for Forrester, Dempsey and Schon until they play then saying they should be dropped!  When we win one, it will be the usual "don't change a winning team", as if they are the only set of players capable of winning a game.

Posted
2 hours ago, Johnnyrotten said:

Yes, there's 2 players per position on the whole (except striker currently)

And right back! Tutu is never a defender, while he’s got a hole in his arse.

Posted
14 hours ago, Lt. Aldo Raine said:

He plays in a different position

What position is that then because he looks like he’d make a pretty good No10 for me and would be more of a scoring threat playing off Burstow than the other two do?

Posted
1 minute ago, Whitesince63 said:

What position is that then because he looks like he’d make a pretty good No10 for me and would be more of a scoring threat playing off Burstow than the other two do?

A wide forward

Posted
8 minutes ago, Lt. Aldo Raine said:

A wide forward

Do you mean like AC because SS didn’t see that role fitting the way he wants to play? I don’t expect him to be a winger so wondered if maybe a more central role would suit the lad better?

Posted (edited)
16 hours ago, Whitesince63 said:

If he’s fit I’d play Warren in front of both of them.

You'd play a guy who played in the 8th tier last season who you've never seen play in a competitive game ahead of Mcatee and Randall ?....who's not a number 10????? LOL

Edited by Arrested development
Posted
43 minutes ago, Whitesince63 said:

Do you mean like AC because SS didn’t see that role fitting the way he wants to play? I don’t expect him to be a winger so wondered if maybe a more central role would suit the lad better?

I'm not sure you know what a number 10 is.

Posted
11 minutes ago, Tonge moor green jacket said:

McAtee was biz for much of last season (though he did score a few good uns) and from what I've seen pre season, he looks no better.

At what point do we try something else?

 

Next Wednesday against Wednesday 

Posted
1 hour ago, Whitesince63 said:

What position is that then because he looks like he’d make a pretty good No10 for me and would be more of a scoring threat playing off Burstow than the other two do?

You're always trying to change players' positions.

It's weird.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.