Jump to content
Wanderers Ways. Neil Thompson 1961-2021

Recommended Posts

Posted

Jesus

I leave you all alone for an evening and it almost ends in fisticuffs on the dogshit-littered pavements of Anfield.

Why is it an assumption by The Bullingdon Club members on here (Bolty, Grey, Miami, Royal etc...) that if you don’t want to rim Johnson and Cummings you are automatically a red?

Corbyn was a cunt. Got what he deserved.

Starmer is better. If anything, the bluenoses should be full of admiration for the way he’s squirmed his way to the top.

Labour aren’t a threat yet. But the fact Starmer has the Tories even slightly rattled suggests he will be in the fullness of time.

The country desperately needs a strong and capable opposition. The rent boys are taking the piss right now.

Posted

Yeah, who are these Corbyn supporters on here? I mean i get the fact that unless you are supporting gunboats in the channel, all for obliterating Palestinians, burning the Quran on Halliwell Rd, questioning why the country should feed hungry kids or not wearing your MAGA y-fronts that you are a bed wetting, Lenninist who has yet to 'grow up' into a single solution blowhard.

I just don't think its an issue with any moderates on here, seems to me more of that poor me, why don't you agree with me victimhood we saw from Paul Handyshandy.

Posted
13 hours ago, gonzo said:

Works both ways. Like carlos said the other day, it shouldn't need saying.

Why bring other race issues in the equation? 

Well nobody moves the goal posts in a debate more than Miami. He will throw a random link in about Sadiq Khan’s local butcher when we are discussing Liverpool’s forward line.

But frankly, other race issues are extremely relevant in this case. You can’t hold the moral high ground on one form of prejudice if you are not able to even acknowledge serious racism exists against other minorities. He also continually tries to discredit the movements that try to bring about change, why?

And for the record I’m delighted that anti-semitism in the Labour Party has been brought out in the open by this report. It was a situation allowed to fester by Corbyn and he has rightly been heavily criticised and suspended.

Posted (edited)
32 minutes ago, Farrelli said:

Well nobody moves the goal posts in a debate more than Miami. He will throw a random link in about Sadiq Khan’s local butcher when we are discussing Liverpool’s forward line.

But frankly, other race issues are extremely relevant in this case. You can’t hold the moral high ground on one form of prejudice if you are not able to even acknowledge serious racism exists against other minorities. He also continually tries to discredit the movements that try to bring about change, why?

And for the record I’m delighted that anti-semitism in the Labour Party has been brought out in the open by this report. It was a situation allowed to fester by Corbyn and he has rightly been heavily criticised and suspended.

Starmer was part of Corbyn government, is that whats meant by squirming to the top?

Edited by Mounts Kipper
Posted
1 minute ago, Mounts Kipper said:

Starmer was part of Corbyn government, is that what you mean by squirming to the top?

Boris Johnson was in Theresa Mays government but you trust him implicitly regarding brexit. That is an example of really squirming and fudging your way to the top.

Posted
4 minutes ago, Farrelli said:

Boris Johnson was in Theresa Mays government but you trust him implicitly regarding brexit. That is an example of really squirming and fudging your way to the top.

Johnson quit, Starmer didn’t.  That’s the difference. 

Posted
25 minutes ago, Mounts Kipper said:

Johnson quit, Starmer didn’t.  That’s the difference. 

For his own political gain. He did it to get the euro sceptics onside. It was for his own expedience. If you can't even see that you really are blind to the facts.

Posted
33 minutes ago, Not in Crawley said:

For his own political gain. He did it to get the euro sceptics onside. It was for his own expedience. If you can't even see that you really are blind to the facts.

Spoiler alert, he really is.

Posted
1 hour ago, Not in Crawley said:

For his own political gain. He did it to get the euro sceptics onside. It was for his own expedience. If you can't even see that you really are blind to the facts.

No doubt Starmer stayed for his own political gain. That’s what they do, 2 cheeks of same arse. 

Posted
Just now, Mounts Kipper said:

No doubt Starmer stayed for his own political gain. That’s what they do, 2 cheeks of same arse. 

But you were using it as an argument to promote Boris' virtues in resigning. Why tie yourself up in knots?

Posted
2 hours ago, Mounts Kipper said:

Starmer was part of Corbyn government, is that whats meant by squirming to the top?

When was there a Corbyn Government? 

Posted
2 hours ago, Mounts Kipper said:

Starmer was part of Corbyn government, is that whats meant by squirming to the top?

 

53 minutes ago, Mounts Kipper said:

No doubt Starmer stayed for his own political gain. That’s what they do, 2 cheeks of same arse. 

Starmer  identified the ticking time-bomb that was Corbyn and friends. He knew they couldn’t win the GE but rather than rock an already sinking boat, he started finding the biggest lifeboat and sat waiting for the last bubbles.

Sneaky fucker to have in your team if he isn’t prepared to state the obvious on the run up to an election. He wasn’t alone in that though.

Posted
44 minutes ago, Mounts Kipper said:

I was just highlighting the difference. 

But then you said they were both doing the exact same thing. You can't use the same point to make two different, and completely opposing views.

Posted
5 hours ago, Farrelli said:

Well nobody moves the goal posts in a debate more than Miami. He will throw a random link in about Sadiq Khan’s local butcher when we are discussing Liverpool’s forward line.

But frankly, other race issues are extremely relevant in this case. You can’t hold the moral high ground on one form of prejudice if you are not able to even acknowledge serious racism exists against other minorities. He also continually tries to discredit the movements that try to bring about change, why?

And for the record I’m delighted that anti-semitism in the Labour Party has been brought out in the open by this report. It was a situation allowed to fester by Corbyn and he has rightly been heavily criticised and suspended.

I've discredited organisations like BLM because they are Marxist and iconoclastic, I said that from day one on the other thread and my point was proven. 

I asked you yesterday to show me definitive proof, not your opinion re racism existing in The Met etc, then I will gladly acknowledge if racism exists there.

Re minorities, are blacks in America a minority ? I don't think so.

Posted
2 minutes ago, miamiwhite said:

Patrisse Cullors...find it yourself fella.......just for the class.


We’re guided by a commitment to dismantle imperialism, capitalism, white-supremacy, patriarchy and the state structures that disproportionately harm black people in Britain and around the world. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.