Jump to content
Wanderers Ways. Neil Thompson 1961-2021

Politics


miamiwhite

Recommended Posts

  • Site Supporter
7 minutes ago, Mounts Kipper said:

I thought Remianers argument was that we couldn't get to the same place unless we were EU members.  

Don’t be angry at me because Rishi has pulled your pants down.

Bolty is actually right for once. The Brexit that hardcore Brexiters still want simply isn’t coming to pass.

Sinn Fein have basically got the win.

Thats gotta hurt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Site Supporter

'Northern Ireland is in the unbelievably special position - unique position in the entire world - in having privileged access not just to the UK market… but also the EU single market'

'Nobody else has that. No one. Only you guys, only here’

Rishi Sunak hails his Brexit deal
 

Has he been rimming the entire Sinn Fein leadership this morning?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I expect a lot of internet searching for the ardent Brexiteers for their favourite commentators to give them a line as to why this was the plan all along, demonstrates why Brexit was a good idea and then add in a pinch of whataboutery.

I see Farage is howling at the king being involved, and that people have Brexit fatigue which has allowed this deal to be passed which means we'll never break free from the EU.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Not in Crawley said:

I expect a lot of internet searching for the ardent Brexiteers for their favourite commentators to give them a line as to why this was the plan all along, demonstrates why Brexit was a good idea and then add in a pinch of whataboutery.

I see Farage is howling at the king being involved, and that people have Brexit fatigue which has allowed this deal to be passed which means we'll never break free from the EU.

Front page of the mail today was about the King shaking hands with the EU bird.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Spider said:

Why would you not vote because of photo ID?

Frankly, anyone of that mindset shouldn’t be allowed to vote in the first place.

Bet they don’t argue about having their photo on a driving license or a passport or a grinder profile

See, you can post a bit of sense when you try 👍

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Site Supporter
1 minute ago, Winchester White said:

Haha, Isabel Oakeshott is about as trustworthy as Boris Johnson, Matt Hancock deserves to be outed for being so thick as to hire her.

Remarkably naive of him. Hubris maybe?

Certainly won't do journalists any favours for the future if trust is undermined.

Hancock's team have said that the messages aren't comprehensive though, and don't reflect the full picture and are essentially looking at action. "All options" was the wording.

No doubt there is a public interest in all this, but as usual, the full facts are needed.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tonge moor green jacket said:

Remarkably naive of him. Hubris maybe?

Certainly won't do journalists any favours for the future if trust is undermined.

Hancock's team have said that the messages aren't comprehensive though, and don't reflect the full picture and are essentially looking at action. "All options" was the wording.

No doubt there is a public interest in all this, but as usual, the full facts are needed.

 

Imagine trying to clean the quality of someone's work from their WhatsApp messages? 

I wouldn't last 2 minutes! 😁

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Tonge moor green jacket said:

Remarkably naive of him. Hubris maybe?

Certainly won't do journalists any favours for the future if trust is undermined.

Hancock's team have said that the messages aren't comprehensive though, and don't reflect the full picture and are essentially looking at action. "All options" was the wording.

No doubt there is a public interest in all this, but as usual, the full facts are needed.

 

The fact the slimy wee twat has a team is the most disturbing bit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Site Supporter

Have these messages already been disclosed to the Covid enquiry and if not, why not?

Why did Hancock hand over private conversations to an untrusted 3rd party without the concent of the other parties in these discussions?

Why are Gov ministers using unsecured 3rd party software apps for official government business?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators
4 hours ago, Tonge moor green jacket said:

Remarkably naive of him. Hubris maybe?

Certainly won't do journalists any favours for the future if trust is undermined.

Hancock's team have said that the messages aren't comprehensive though, and don't reflect the full picture and are essentially looking at action. "All options" was the wording.

No doubt there is a public interest in all this, but as usual, the full facts are needed.

 

aye, the enquiry should have access to everything

the times have reported on two whatsapp messages a few hours apart

hancocks lot say a lot happened not reported on between the two messages

fair enough

let the enquiry do their job

apparently it was leaked because the enquiry will take months and this needs to be out now

so is being drip fed to the press

load of old shite

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.