It's happening. 

https://www.theboltonnews.co.uk/sport/17405193.bolton-wanderers-close-to-takeover-from-uk-based-consortium/

Thank fuck

4 minutes ago, gonzo said:

No balls and BCG 

Just so you can't delete it

2 minutes ago, Gonk said:

Just so you can't delete it

He's doomed

23 minutes ago, victor meldrew said:

does his jimmy saville impersonation when not going to blackburn /forrest

😂

13 minutes ago, Jeebster said:

I thought someone off here (Casino ?) was going to unmask Howard a week or so ago....I take it that's now not happening ?

Surely as we are now in admin & Howard isn't connected to any interested bidder, and with the recent information looking like its not accurate i.e. the ST stopping an immediate purchase by the Chinese due to an apparent exclusivity clause, he / she's identity can now be revealed just out of sheer curiosity.

I think he was waiting for a takeover to complete first. If Howard doesn't reveal all by then, then Casino said he would.

11 minutes ago, gonzo said:

No balls and BCG 

peak Wanderers Ways reached.

Look at them fookin trainers. What a nonce

23 minutes ago, Jeebster said:

I thought someone off here (Casino ?) was going to unmask Howard a week or so ago....I take it that's now not happening ?

Surely as we are now in admin & Howard isn't connected to any interested bidder, and with the recent information looking like its not accurate i.e. the ST stopping an immediate purchase by the Chinese due to an apparent exclusivity clause, he / she's identity can now be revealed just out of sheer curiosity.

Unfortunately he would be in breach of more privacy laws than Facebook. He has already admitted to using my email suffix to attempt to discover who I/we are.

But for the record, I/we were employed to test the credentials of interested parties, both in respect of their actual abilities to complete a deal and to shine a light on issues that they may have missed. That should realistically tell you who we were in the employ of.

As Marc Iles said, you can’t take people seriously who don’t go ‘on the public record’. A cursory glance at the messaging boards of other clubs who have been taken over would reveal a common theme where we have been employed. 

We had actually been engaged to further an agenda against the ST over the coming week, but I now believe that this will not be necessary. 

Good luck.

 

 

3 minutes ago, Howardroark said:

Unfortunately he would be in breach of more privacy laws than Facebook. He has already admitted to using my email suffix to attempt to discover who I/we are.

But for the record, I/we were employed to test the credentials of interested parties, both in respect of their actual abilities to complete a deal and to shine a light on issues that they may have missed. That should realistically tell you who we were in the employ of.

As Marc Iles said, you can’t take people seriously who don’t go ‘on the public record’. A cursory glance at the messaging boards of other clubs who have been taken over would reveal a common theme where we have been employed. 

We had actually been engaged to further an agenda against the ST over the coming week, but I now believe that this will not be necessary. 

Good luck.

 

 

I sincerely appreciate the response & have no issue whatsoever with anything you have posted over the past two months, but I'm honestly none the wiser in regards to 'that should tell you who we were in the employ of.

Perhaps others on here may now have a clue ?

1 hour ago, victor meldrew said:

underpants and casino

Be very careful. I might post the picture you saw last night.

Obviously Andersons laccy 

4 minutes ago, Underpants said:

Be very careful. I might post the picture you saw last night.

casino still got the same sunglasses i see

Edited May 14, 20197 yr by victor meldrew
missed a bit

12 minutes ago, Howardroark said:

Unfortunately he would be in breach of more privacy laws than Facebook. He has already admitted to using my email suffix to attempt to discover who I/we are.

But for the record, I/we were employed to test the credentials of interested parties, both in respect of their actual abilities to complete a deal and to shine a light on issues that they may have missed. That should realistically tell you who we were in the employ of.

As Marc Iles said, you can’t take people seriously who don’t go ‘on the public record’. A cursory glance at the messaging boards of other clubs who have been taken over would reveal a common theme where we have been employed. 

We had actually been engaged to further an agenda against the ST over the coming week, but I now believe that this will not be necessary. 

Good luck.

 

 

What a strange job you have

17 minutes ago, Howardroark said:

Unfortunately he would be in breach of more privacy laws than Facebook. He has already admitted to using my email suffix to attempt to discover who I/we are.

But for the record, I/we were employed to test the credentials of interested parties, both in respect of their actual abilities to complete a deal and to shine a light on issues that they may have missed. That should realistically tell you who we were in the employ of.

As Marc Iles said, you can’t take people seriously who don’t go ‘on the public record’. A cursory glance at the messaging boards of other clubs who have been taken over would reveal a common theme where we have been employed. 

We had actually been engaged to further an agenda against the ST over the coming week, but I now believe that this will not be necessary. 

Good luck.

 

 

I'm left with one question H bomb...

 

Thas got a cock or wha? 

18 minutes ago, Howardroark said:

Unfortunately he would be in breach of more privacy laws than Facebook. He has already admitted to using my email suffix to attempt to discover who I/we are.

But for the record, I/we were employed to test the credentials of interested parties, both in respect of their actual abilities to complete a deal and to shine a light on issues that they may have missed. That should realistically tell you who we were in the employ of.

As Marc Iles said, you can’t take people seriously who don’t go ‘on the public record’. A cursory glance at the messaging boards of other clubs who have been taken over would reveal a common theme where we have been employed. 

We had actually been engaged to further an agenda against the ST over the coming week, but I now believe that this will not be necessary. 

Good luck.

 

 

 

17 minutes ago, Howardroark said:

Unfortunately he would be in breach of more privacy laws than Facebook. He has already admitted to using my email suffix to attempt to discover who I/we are.

But for the record, I/we were employed to test the credentials of interested parties, both in respect of their actual abilities to complete a deal and to shine a light on issues that they may have missed. That should realistically tell you who we were in the employ of.

As Marc Iles said, you can’t take people seriously who don’t go ‘on the public record’. A cursory glance at the messaging boards of other clubs who have been taken over would reveal a common theme where we have been employed. 

We had actually been engaged to further an agenda against the ST over the coming week, but I now believe that this will not be necessary. 

Good luck.

 

 

If it's so obvious, just tell us who you are,

18 minutes ago, Howardroark said:

Unfortunately he would be in breach of more privacy laws than Facebook. He has already admitted to using my email suffix to attempt to discover who I/we are.

But for the record, I/we were employed to test the credentials of interested parties, both in respect of their actual abilities to complete a deal and to shine a light on issues that they may have missed. That should realistically tell you who we were in the employ of.

As Marc Iles said, you can’t take people seriously who don’t go ‘on the public record’. A cursory glance at the messaging boards of other clubs who have been taken over would reveal a common theme where we have been employed. 

We had actually been engaged to further an agenda against the ST over the coming week, but I now believe that this will not be necessary. 

Good luck.

 

 

Howard, so if this agenda against the ST is not now required, does that mean a conclusion is now nearer in regards to a buyer out of admin ?

Cryptic or of full crap, or both? I really don't care who Howard is or isn't. Came on here, filled most of us with some hope, and came to nothing really. seems to fill the thread with some truths but most turned out to be just PR dribble.

 

 

21 minutes ago, Howardroark said:

Unfortunately he would be in breach of more privacy laws than Facebook. He has already admitted to using my email suffix to attempt to discover who I/we are.

But for the record, I/we were employed to test the credentials of interested parties, both in respect of their actual abilities to complete a deal and to shine a light on issues that they may have missed. That should realistically tell you who we were in the employ of.

As Marc Iles said, you can’t take people seriously who don’t go ‘on the public record’. A cursory glance at the messaging boards of other clubs who have been taken over would reveal a common theme where we have been employed. 

We had actually been engaged to further an agenda against the ST over the coming week, but I now believe that this will not be necessary. 

Good luck.

 

 

Employed by Moonshift/fildraw?

Mark Taylor went on public record re Chinese bid

Common theme - Chinese takeover....wolves,saints etc

 

11 minutes ago, mickbrown said:

What a strange job you have

What, where you spend all day chatting shit on wanderers ways?  

We all get paid to do that 

22 minutes ago, Howardroark said:

Unfortunately he would be in breach of more privacy laws than Facebook. He has already admitted to using my email suffix to attempt to discover who I/we are.

But for the record, I/we were employed to test the credentials of interested parties, both in respect of their actual abilities to complete a deal and to shine a light on issues that they may have missed. That should realistically tell you who we were in the employ of.

As Marc Iles said, you can’t take people seriously who don’t go ‘on the public record’. A cursory glance at the messaging boards of other clubs who have been taken over would reveal a common theme where we have been employed. 

We had actually been engaged to further an agenda against the ST over the coming week, but I now believe that this will not be necessary. 

Good luck.

 

 

Sounds like you were either employed by a creditor of BWFC, the EDT or KA then, if you were trying to test credibility of parties.

Your story is getting more mental by the day though. I'm truly baffled now.

2 minutes ago, ZicoKelly said:

What, where you spend all day chatting shit on wanderers ways?  

We all get paid to do that 

Said I/we, so maybe Howard is in fact several people taking turns on the account. I think John Galt must have been Howard too?

Or maybe Howard has schizophrenia.

Reads to me like he/she was employed by EDT and they are suggesting that the ST have stepped back, possibly due to some kind of deal being reached.

 

feck knows

It’s like the fucking da Vinci code all this. 

 

Can someone re cap the latest news? Are we going to be renamed shendong wanderers or what? Is Big Sam involved

In which case, Howard are the Chinese lot buying the club?

Howard won't have been employed by KA, that cunt would never want anyone knowing anything and would rather people give him money without knowing anything.