Gonk Posted May 14, 2019 Posted May 14, 2019 4 minutes ago, gonzo said: No balls and BCG Just so you can't delete it
barryk32 Posted May 14, 2019 Posted May 14, 2019 2 minutes ago, Gonk said: Just so you can't delete it He's doomed
tomski Posted May 14, 2019 Posted May 14, 2019 23 minutes ago, victor meldrew said: does his jimmy saville impersonation when not going to blackburn /forrest 😂
Mantra Posted May 14, 2019 Posted May 14, 2019 13 minutes ago, Jeebster said: I thought someone off here (Casino ?) was going to unmask Howard a week or so ago....I take it that's now not happening ? Surely as we are now in admin & Howard isn't connected to any interested bidder, and with the recent information looking like its not accurate i.e. the ST stopping an immediate purchase by the Chinese due to an apparent exclusivity clause, he / she's identity can now be revealed just out of sheer curiosity. I think he was waiting for a takeover to complete first. If Howard doesn't reveal all by then, then Casino said he would.
Marc505 Posted May 14, 2019 Posted May 14, 2019 11 minutes ago, gonzo said: No balls and BCG peak Wanderers Ways reached.
Howardroark Posted May 14, 2019 Posted May 14, 2019 23 minutes ago, Jeebster said: I thought someone off here (Casino ?) was going to unmask Howard a week or so ago....I take it that's now not happening ? Surely as we are now in admin & Howard isn't connected to any interested bidder, and with the recent information looking like its not accurate i.e. the ST stopping an immediate purchase by the Chinese due to an apparent exclusivity clause, he / she's identity can now be revealed just out of sheer curiosity. Unfortunately he would be in breach of more privacy laws than Facebook. He has already admitted to using my email suffix to attempt to discover who I/we are. But for the record, I/we were employed to test the credentials of interested parties, both in respect of their actual abilities to complete a deal and to shine a light on issues that they may have missed. That should realistically tell you who we were in the employ of. As Marc Iles said, you can’t take people seriously who don’t go ‘on the public record’. A cursory glance at the messaging boards of other clubs who have been taken over would reveal a common theme where we have been employed. We had actually been engaged to further an agenda against the ST over the coming week, but I now believe that this will not be necessary. Good luck.
Jeebster Posted May 14, 2019 Posted May 14, 2019 3 minutes ago, Howardroark said: Unfortunately he would be in breach of more privacy laws than Facebook. He has already admitted to using my email suffix to attempt to discover who I/we are. But for the record, I/we were employed to test the credentials of interested parties, both in respect of their actual abilities to complete a deal and to shine a light on issues that they may have missed. That should realistically tell you who we were in the employ of. As Marc Iles said, you can’t take people seriously who don’t go ‘on the public record’. A cursory glance at the messaging boards of other clubs who have been taken over would reveal a common theme where we have been employed. We had actually been engaged to further an agenda against the ST over the coming week, but I now believe that this will not be necessary. Good luck. I sincerely appreciate the response & have no issue whatsoever with anything you have posted over the past two months, but I'm honestly none the wiser in regards to 'that should tell you who we were in the employ of. Perhaps others on here may now have a clue ?
Underpants Posted May 14, 2019 Posted May 14, 2019 1 hour ago, victor meldrew said: underpants and casino Be very careful. I might post the picture you saw last night.
victor meldrew Posted May 14, 2019 Posted May 14, 2019 (edited) 4 minutes ago, Underpants said: Be very careful. I might post the picture you saw last night. casino still got the same sunglasses i see Edited May 14, 2019 by victor meldrew missed a bit
mickbrown Posted May 14, 2019 Posted May 14, 2019 12 minutes ago, Howardroark said: Unfortunately he would be in breach of more privacy laws than Facebook. He has already admitted to using my email suffix to attempt to discover who I/we are. But for the record, I/we were employed to test the credentials of interested parties, both in respect of their actual abilities to complete a deal and to shine a light on issues that they may have missed. That should realistically tell you who we were in the employ of. As Marc Iles said, you can’t take people seriously who don’t go ‘on the public record’. A cursory glance at the messaging boards of other clubs who have been taken over would reveal a common theme where we have been employed. We had actually been engaged to further an agenda against the ST over the coming week, but I now believe that this will not be necessary. Good luck. What a strange job you have
stevieb Posted May 14, 2019 Posted May 14, 2019 17 minutes ago, Howardroark said: Unfortunately he would be in breach of more privacy laws than Facebook. He has already admitted to using my email suffix to attempt to discover who I/we are. But for the record, I/we were employed to test the credentials of interested parties, both in respect of their actual abilities to complete a deal and to shine a light on issues that they may have missed. That should realistically tell you who we were in the employ of. As Marc Iles said, you can’t take people seriously who don’t go ‘on the public record’. A cursory glance at the messaging boards of other clubs who have been taken over would reveal a common theme where we have been employed. We had actually been engaged to further an agenda against the ST over the coming week, but I now believe that this will not be necessary. Good luck. I'm left with one question H bomb... Thas got a cock or wha?
kent_white Posted May 14, 2019 Posted May 14, 2019 18 minutes ago, Howardroark said: Unfortunately he would be in breach of more privacy laws than Facebook. He has already admitted to using my email suffix to attempt to discover who I/we are. But for the record, I/we were employed to test the credentials of interested parties, both in respect of their actual abilities to complete a deal and to shine a light on issues that they may have missed. That should realistically tell you who we were in the employ of. As Marc Iles said, you can’t take people seriously who don’t go ‘on the public record’. A cursory glance at the messaging boards of other clubs who have been taken over would reveal a common theme where we have been employed. We had actually been engaged to further an agenda against the ST over the coming week, but I now believe that this will not be necessary. Good luck.
Alf Hartigan Posted May 14, 2019 Posted May 14, 2019 17 minutes ago, Howardroark said: Unfortunately he would be in breach of more privacy laws than Facebook. He has already admitted to using my email suffix to attempt to discover who I/we are. But for the record, I/we were employed to test the credentials of interested parties, both in respect of their actual abilities to complete a deal and to shine a light on issues that they may have missed. That should realistically tell you who we were in the employ of. As Marc Iles said, you can’t take people seriously who don’t go ‘on the public record’. A cursory glance at the messaging boards of other clubs who have been taken over would reveal a common theme where we have been employed. We had actually been engaged to further an agenda against the ST over the coming week, but I now believe that this will not be necessary. Good luck. If it's so obvious, just tell us who you are,
Jeebster Posted May 14, 2019 Posted May 14, 2019 18 minutes ago, Howardroark said: Unfortunately he would be in breach of more privacy laws than Facebook. He has already admitted to using my email suffix to attempt to discover who I/we are. But for the record, I/we were employed to test the credentials of interested parties, both in respect of their actual abilities to complete a deal and to shine a light on issues that they may have missed. That should realistically tell you who we were in the employ of. As Marc Iles said, you can’t take people seriously who don’t go ‘on the public record’. A cursory glance at the messaging boards of other clubs who have been taken over would reveal a common theme where we have been employed. We had actually been engaged to further an agenda against the ST over the coming week, but I now believe that this will not be necessary. Good luck. Howard, so if this agenda against the ST is not now required, does that mean a conclusion is now nearer in regards to a buyer out of admin ?
lowcarbon Posted May 14, 2019 Posted May 14, 2019 Cryptic or of full crap, or both? I really don't care who Howard is or isn't. Came on here, filled most of us with some hope, and came to nothing really. seems to fill the thread with some truths but most turned out to be just PR dribble.
Domcarey1 Posted May 14, 2019 Posted May 14, 2019 21 minutes ago, Howardroark said: Unfortunately he would be in breach of more privacy laws than Facebook. He has already admitted to using my email suffix to attempt to discover who I/we are. But for the record, I/we were employed to test the credentials of interested parties, both in respect of their actual abilities to complete a deal and to shine a light on issues that they may have missed. That should realistically tell you who we were in the employ of. As Marc Iles said, you can’t take people seriously who don’t go ‘on the public record’. A cursory glance at the messaging boards of other clubs who have been taken over would reveal a common theme where we have been employed. We had actually been engaged to further an agenda against the ST over the coming week, but I now believe that this will not be necessary. Good luck. Employed by Moonshift/fildraw? Mark Taylor went on public record re Chinese bid Common theme - Chinese takeover....wolves,saints etc
Zico Posted May 14, 2019 Posted May 14, 2019 11 minutes ago, mickbrown said: What a strange job you have What, where you spend all day chatting shit on wanderers ways? We all get paid to do that
Mantra Posted May 14, 2019 Posted May 14, 2019 22 minutes ago, Howardroark said: Unfortunately he would be in breach of more privacy laws than Facebook. He has already admitted to using my email suffix to attempt to discover who I/we are. But for the record, I/we were employed to test the credentials of interested parties, both in respect of their actual abilities to complete a deal and to shine a light on issues that they may have missed. That should realistically tell you who we were in the employ of. As Marc Iles said, you can’t take people seriously who don’t go ‘on the public record’. A cursory glance at the messaging boards of other clubs who have been taken over would reveal a common theme where we have been employed. We had actually been engaged to further an agenda against the ST over the coming week, but I now believe that this will not be necessary. Good luck. Sounds like you were either employed by a creditor of BWFC, the EDT or KA then, if you were trying to test credibility of parties. Your story is getting more mental by the day though. I'm truly baffled now.
Mantra Posted May 14, 2019 Posted May 14, 2019 2 minutes ago, ZicoKelly said: What, where you spend all day chatting shit on wanderers ways? We all get paid to do that Said I/we, so maybe Howard is in fact several people taking turns on the account. I think John Galt must have been Howard too? Or maybe Howard has schizophrenia.
DaisyHWanderer Posted May 14, 2019 Posted May 14, 2019 Reads to me like he/she was employed by EDT and they are suggesting that the ST have stepped back, possibly due to some kind of deal being reached. feck knows
RatchetMan Posted May 14, 2019 Posted May 14, 2019 It’s like the fucking da Vinci code all this. Can someone re cap the latest news? Are we going to be renamed shendong wanderers or what? Is Big Sam involved
HomerJay Posted May 14, 2019 Posted May 14, 2019 In which case, Howard are the Chinese lot buying the club?
Recommended Posts