Slow news day? The real deal? End of the world? 
 

They’re saying it probably came from an animal, has Somebody been shagging monkeys again? 

1 minute ago, Tonge moor green jacket said:

I had a routine appointment last week, and although the doors had notices not to enter if you had symptoms, the doors were unlocked and anyone could walk in. Only a couple in the waiting room, but I suppose that's not the point.

Theyre not even being allowed in public areas and they still got shit

1 minute ago, Rudy’s Message said:

There’s a joke there somewhere 

Trust me many were made.

34 minutes ago, Nowack said:

Having a flu jab at work and being advised by a GP to have one because of a health condition are different things. 

I know - I was being facetious

3 minutes ago, Tonge moor green jacket said:

I had a routine appointment last week, and although the doors had notices not to enter if you had symptoms, the doors were unlocked and anyone could walk in. Only a couple in the waiting room, but I suppose that's not the point.

Mates lad been ill for a week or so. Docs tonight. Had to report to the “red zone” which was outside! 
 

my docs stopped open surgery a week ago now. You can get advice over the Phone and they can decide how best to treat you but appointments were seemingly stopped. 

Day 67 

I can still confirm marijuana is keeping COVID19 away.

1 hour ago, Nobster said:

We have just been locked down for 2 weeks, not allowed out of the apartment from noon tomorrow, the army are in the valley to prevent any movement. 

It's the French Army, if you walk up to them they'll runaway or surrender!

1 hour ago, bwfcfan5 said:

They’ve really fucked over the hospitality industry today. By telling people not to go, yet not ordering them to close it means insurers won’t pay out. Loads of angry restaurant owners. Pretty poor. And he dressed up his move to protect insurers as ‘hey we live in a Liberal society’. Fucking nonsense. If it’s as bad as you want people to think it isn’t an issue to order them to shut. 

Do you really think that’s what the U.K. government want too achieve, if they’ve made a mistake I fully expect that they’ll rectify it. 

1 minute ago, Mounts Kipper said:

Do you really think that’s what the U.K. government want too achieve, if they’ve made a mistake I fully expect that they’ll rectify it. 

He’s got his hospitality/loss adjusters hat on tonight. Break from football management leaving him with time to kill it appears  should be developing  a vaccine really 

 

2 minutes ago, Escobarp said:

He’s got his hospitality/loss adjusters hat on tonight. Break from football management leaving him with time to kill it appears  should be developing  a vaccine really 

 

Why do you think he hasn't ordered closure

I can only think of 2 reasons and neither are acceptable

Just now, Casino said:

Why do you think he hasn't ordered closure

I can only think of 2 reasons and neither are acceptable

Honest opinion is I think he’s stuck still between two schools of thought. He’s just been bold and plumped for herd immunity and now being advised to back track And go for prevention which will lead to lockdown imo. The closure of pubs and restaurants is coming though and soon 

 

also my FIL is a loss adjuster. Instances like this closure isn’t always necessary for a claim on business interruption apparently. But Fanny will know better 

but nonetheless it’s coming anyway. Week tops 

1 hour ago, boltondiver said:

Coronanation Street

Albert Tatlockdown

2 hours ago, Nowack said:

I believe if you have been advised to have a flu jab in the past then you are at risk. 

Fuck, I was offered last week and said no... Back in for results tomorrow, so will ask

30 minutes ago, Rudy’s Message said:

Day 67 

I can still confirm marijuana is keeping COVID19 away.

Im texting to see if anyone will panic sell 

 

4 minutes ago, ZicoKelly said:

Im texting to see if anyone will panic sell 

Netherlands went into shutdown today so cafes had queues outside them 

13 minutes ago, Escobarp said:

Honest opinion is I think he’s stuck still between two schools of thought. He’s just been bold and plumped for herd immunity and now being advised to back track And go for prevention which will lead to lockdown imo. The closure of pubs and restaurants is coming though and soon 

 

also my FIL is a loss adjuster. Instances like this closure isn’t always necessary for a claim on business interruption apparently. But Fanny will know better 

but nonetheless it’s coming anyway. Week tops 

I’d have thought that this sort of event would be covered under force majeure (act of god) 

But then again, that would rule out loads of insurance claims (storms etc) 

1 minute ago, birch-chorley said:

I’d have thought that this sort of event would be covered under force majeure (act of god) 

But then again, that would rule out loads of insurance claims (storms etc) 

I did raise this very point with him Saturday night but he said lots of policies will be different no hard and fast rule. 
 

Also said how they calculate the compo varies wildly. Ranging from average last 3 months to 12 months rolling in the main 

 

26 minutes ago, Casino said:

Why do you think he hasn't ordered closure

I can only think of 2 reasons and neither are acceptable

Does feel like a nonsense, just confusing really 

My FB feed full of restaurants begging folk to come in yet the government seem to not want you to go in 

meanwhile kids are in nursery and school handing the virus round like a game of pass the parcel 

Our street has set up a WhatsApp group so folk can help if anybody has to self isolate. 
 

Nice touch

Going to be a right bugger this virus...

https://www.buzzfeed.com/alexwickham/coronavirus-uk-strategy-deaths

 

5 minutes ago, mickbrown said:

Our street has set up a WhatsApp group so folk can help if anybody has to self isolate. 
 

Nice touch

I know the name of two people that live in my street and they remain the only two I’ve ever muttered a word to. 
 

if they want help I will help of course but won’t be giving my number out to the Cunts that’s for sure or pretending I’ve any interest in any of them. 

32 minutes ago, miamiwhite said:

Albert Tatlockdown

Rita Faircough

Norris Cold 

simple explanation going around on FB
 

The Government Plan explained  to why we are not in lock down .

His plan is to segregate all vulnerable people (older, illand at risk) let’s call this group A

Anyone looking after the older,ill and at risk can be group B

The general population generally healthy can be group C

Group C needs to go about it’s business keeping the country moving kids at school us at work

Group B looks after group A and avoids contact with C

Group C is allowed to contract the virus and because it’s generally healthy it can cope with it better than group A

Group A and B are almost self isolating without the virus to avoid putting strain on the NHS and reducing the risk of getting the virus and then needing the NHS

Group C (the generally healthy) go through the cycle of contracting the virus self isolating and being looked after by healthy family members, friends and the local community
Anyone who has complications gets looked after by the NHS while groups A and B are kept away The NHS are not strained by A and B while its looking after complicated cases in C

As group C comes full circle and recovers it divides in to groups that take group B’s position looking after group A allowing group B to go though the cycle

With B and C though the cycle
A is free to have NHS to itself because B and C are now clear from illness and infection and hopefully have a degree of immunity from getting it again this season. 

 

1 minute ago, royal white said:

simple explanation going around on FB
 

The Government Plan explained  to why we are not in lock down .

His plan is to segregate all vulnerable people (older, illand at risk) let’s call this group A

Anyone looking after the older,ill and at risk can be group B

The general population generally healthy can be group C

Group C needs to go about it’s business keeping the country moving kids at school us at work

Group B looks after group A and avoids contact with C

Group C is allowed to contract the virus and because it’s generally healthy it can cope with it better than group A

Group A and B are almost self isolating without the virus to avoid putting strain on the NHS and reducing the risk of getting the virus and then needing the NHS

Group C (the generally healthy) go through the cycle of contracting the virus self isolating and being looked after by healthy family members, friends and the local community
Anyone who has complications gets looked after by the NHS while groups A and B are kept away The NHS are not strained by A and B while its looking after complicated cases in C

As group C comes full circle and recovers it divides in to groups that take group B’s position looking after group A allowing group B to go though the cycle

With B and C though the cycle
A is free to have NHS to itself because B and C are now clear from illness and infection and hopefully have a degree of immunity from getting it again this season. 

 

Makes perfect sense to me that

but .....Brace yourself pal here they come 😴😴

15 minutes ago, Escobarp said:

I know the name of two people that live in my street and they remain the only two I’ve ever muttered a word to. 
 

if they want help I will help of course but won’t be giving my number out to the Cunts that’s for sure or pretending I’ve any interest in any of them. 

Get in the street group and then get some clips off myself and Gonzo....see how long they last 🤪