Meanwhile in Israel

[wanderer1984]

1 minute ago, mickbrown said:

Because he wouldn’t comply with the police order to leave the area. 
 

Quite simple really. But you already knew that

What was he doing wrong?

[mickbrown]

2 minutes ago, wanderer1984 said:

What was he doing wrong?

I’ve just told you. 

[wanderer1984]

25 minutes ago, mickbrown said:

I’ve just told you. 

Why was the police order in place?

[gonzo]

[mickbrown]

8 minutes ago, wanderer1984 said:

Why was the police order in place?

You know why. 
 

Why you asking me?

 

[wanderer1984]

3 minutes ago, gonzo said:

But ... but .. Tommy was arrested for attending.

Must have been some disorder?

Over in palestine folk are chopped up while civilians celebrate. 

[wanderer1984]

3 minutes ago, mickbrown said:

You know why. 
 

Why you asking me?

 

I don't though.

You disputed it.

Tell me why he was arrested?

Edited November 26, 2023 by wanderer1984

[mickbrown]

Just now, wanderer1984 said:

I don't though.

You disputed it.

Tell me why he was arrested.

It’s all in the public domain.
 

I ain’t your personal google. 

[kent_white]

1 minute ago, mickbrown said:

It’s all in the public domain.
 

I ain’t your personal google. 

Could you tell me? I only use the BBC for news and since Tommy Robinson got it shut down after his documentary a few years back I have no sources of reliable information 😁

[Zico]

11 minutes ago, wanderer1984 said:

I don't though.

You disputed it.

Tell me why he was arrested?

 

7 minutes ago, kent_white said:

Could you tell me? I only use the BBC for news and since Tommy Robinson got it shut down after his documentary a few years back I have no sources of reliable information 😁

 

Also

Metropolitan Police spokesman said: “The arrested man resisted as officers attempted to put him in handcuffs. He was warned repeatedly before PAVA spray was used. Following its use, officers gained control of him and handcuffs were applied.”

 

In an earlier statement, the force said organisers had “been clear about their concerns that the man’s attendance, and that of those who were likely to accompany him, would cause fear for other participants.

 

“The same view has been voiced by others. As a result he was spoken to and warned on more than one occasion that his continued presence in the area was likely to cause harassment, alarm and distress to others. He was directed to leave the area but refused to do so.”

 

[mickbrown]

8 minutes ago, kent_white said:

Could you tell me? I only use the BBC for news and since Tommy Robinson got it shut down after his documentary a few years back I have no sources of reliable information 😁

😃

Free Tommeh/Stephen or whatever the shit stirring bellend is calling himself these days. 

[kent_white]

Just now, Zico said:

 

 

Also

Metropolitan Police spokesman said: “The arrested man resisted as officers attempted to put him in handcuffs. He was warned repeatedly before PAVA spray was used. Following its use, officers gained control of him and handcuffs were applied.”

 

In an earlier statement, the force said organisers had “been clear about their concerns that the man’s attendance, and that of those who were likely to accompany him, would cause fear for other participants.

 

“The same view has been voiced by others. As a result he was spoken to and warned on more than one occasion that his continued presence in the area was likely to cause harassment, alarm and distress to others. He was directed to leave the area but refused to do so.”

 

Thanks Zico. So he hadn't actually done anything. He'd just been 'advised' not to be there and didn't take the advice. 

I'm not a TR fan but doesn't quite sit right with me?

[mickbrown]

2 minutes ago, Zico said:

 

 

Also

Metropolitan Police spokesman said: “The arrested man resisted as officers attempted to put him in handcuffs. He was warned repeatedly before PAVA spray was used. Following its use, officers gained control of him and handcuffs were applied.”

 

In an earlier statement, the force said organisers had “been clear about their concerns that the man’s attendance, and that of those who were likely to accompany him, would cause fear for other participants.

 

“The same view has been voiced by others. As a result he was spoken to and warned on more than one occasion that his continued presence in the area was likely to cause harassment, alarm and distress to others. He was directed to leave the area but refused to do so.”

 

Yeah, but why?

😃

[Zico]

15 hours ago, wanderer1984 said:

Hope this is fake.

 

 

 

I doubt it's fake.

Fucking grim is what it is 

Public executions and treating folk inhumanely are a way of life for extreme nut jobs in that part of the world 

I doubt anyone here would try and justify it in anyway 

Shouldn't be used to justify what Israel do either

[Zico]

6 hours ago, kent_white said:

Thanks Zico. So he hadn't actually done anything. He'd just been 'advised' not to be there and didn't take the advice. 

I'm not a TR fan but doesn't quite sit right with me?

Trouble and disorder follow him wherever he goes

So if you want a peaceful protest the last thing you want is him turning up 

When was the last time he calmy reported on anything in his capacity as a self styled journalist? 

He's not anti semetic, he's anti Islam, that's not what the protest was about

So he gets asked to move on 

And refuses to 

No doubt kicking up a fuss in the process 

Same old story

Fuck him 

[bolty58]

6 hours ago, kent_white said:

Thanks Zico. So he hadn't actually done anything. He'd just been 'advised' not to be there and didn't take the advice. 

I'm not a TR fan but doesn't quite sit right with me?

Always a voice of reason from that side. Have a 'like'.

[bolty58]

26 minutes ago, Zico said:

I doubt it's fake.

Fucking grim is what it is 

Public executions and treating folk inhumanely are a way of life for extreme nut jobs in that part of the world 

I doubt anyone here would try and justify it in anyway

Likely but would they outright condemn it?

When you say 'here' do you mean Wanderersways or the UK? I suspect some of the intolerant thug marchers waving Palestine flags and wearing Hamas headbands would more than justify it. I suspect they would cheer with exultation as they did when the October 7th atrocities became news.

[bolty58]

19 minutes ago, Zico said:

Trouble and disorder follow him wherever he goes

So if you want a peaceful protest the last thing you want is him turning up 

When was the last time he calmy reported on anything in his capacity as a self styled journalist? 

He's not anti semetic, he's anti Islam, that's not what the protest was about

So he gets asked to move on 

And refuses to 

No doubt kicking up a fuss in the process 

Same old story

Fuck him 

Thankfully there are those on here who could be classed as politically aligned (to an extent) with you who see the danger in 'shutting down' anyone with a voice who the likes of the British Board of Communists would label 'far right'.

Thin end of the wedge along the lines of those stupid fuckers currently in power in the US who have weaponised the judiciary. Hopefully one day it blows up in their faces.

[Zico]

3 minutes ago, bolty58 said:

Likely but would they outright condemn it?

When you say 'here' do you mean Wanderersways or the UK? I suspect some of the intolerant thug marchers waving Palestine flags and wearing Hamas headbands would more than justify it. I suspect they would cheer with exultation as they did when the October 7th atrocities became news.

Here as in wanderers ways where nobody is pro Hamas 

[bolty58]

Just now, Zico said:

Here as in wanderers ways where nobody is pro Hamas 

So they say.

[Zico]

6 minutes ago, bolty58 said:

Thankfully there are those on here who could be classed as politically aligned (to an extent) with you who see the danger in 'shutting down' anyone with a voice who the likes of the British Board of Communists would label 'far right'.

Thin end of the wedge along the lines of those stupid fuckers currently in power in the US who have weaponised the judiciary. Hopefully one day it blows up in their faces.

Why did you put far right in quotes? Do you not think it's applicable to Tommy Robinson? 

I've no issue with the shutting down of the far left or far right when there only objective is disruption 

Eg no issue with stop oil protestors who refuse to move on being nicked

[Zico]

9 minutes ago, bolty58 said:

So they say.

Who do you think is pro Hamas?

[kent_white]

1 hour ago, Zico said:

Trouble and disorder follow him wherever he goes

So if you want a peaceful protest the last thing you want is him turning up 

When was the last time he calmy reported on anything in his capacity as a self styled journalist? 

He's not anti semetic, he's anti Islam, that's not what the protest was about

So he gets asked to move on 

And refuses to 

No doubt kicking up a fuss in the process 

Same old story

Fuck him 

I guess that's the point. Had he done anything to warrant being asked to move on? Or was he just there? 

I was expecting to read he'd started kicking off or something but I can't find anything to suggest he did. I genuinely didn't realise the police had the powers to do what they did, but perhaps the that's my ignorance, mainly because I don't go around kicking off everywhere probably. 

Anyway - like I say - not really arsed about TR - more just surprised that this is the way the system works. 

Could they not have sacked off BJ as well? Just for balance? 😁

[Spider]

I seem to recall protests being organised for the Kings Coronation.

There was a right ding dong on here about how those protests should be managed.

Many said the protestors should be free to go where they pleased so long as it didn’t disturb the coronation route (I’d need to go back for precise details). In essence, the protesters should not be subjected to any police intervention.

I got hammered when I suggested the protest be controlled by police as far away as possible. That the police working to prevent any flashpoints was somehow in infringement of civil liberties.

It’s the same with Tommy. I think he should be kept away from protests as he’s a clear and obvious incitement risk.

But you can’t have it both ways. If you are happy for anti-royal protests to be given their space and no harsh policing, you should be happy for Robinson to be front and centre as well.

No hypocrisy, lads.

[royal white]

6 minutes ago, Spider said:

I seem to recall protests being organised for the Kings Coronation.

There was a right ding dong on here about how those protests should be managed.

Many said the protestors should be free to go where they pleased so long as it didn’t disturb the coronation route (I’d need to go back for precise details). In essence, the protesters should not be subjected to any police intervention.

I got hammered when I suggested the protest be controlled by police as far away as possible. That the police working to prevent any flashpoints was somehow in infringement of civil liberties.

It’s the same with Tommy. I think he should be kept away from protests as he’s a clear and obvious incitement risk.

But you can’t have it both ways. If you are happy for anti-royal protests to be given their space and no harsh policing, you should be happy for Robinson to be front and centre as well.

No hypocrisy, lads.

@London Wanderer 👆🏻