Jump to content
Wanderers Ways. Neil Thompson 1961-2021

Recommended Posts

Posted
22 minutes ago, maaarsh said:

He's can't un drop the catches that already cost the Ashes unfortunately, so unless he has a time machine proving his doubters wrong is an impossible task.

I think it’s more than that. Other individuals also didn’t perform in first 2 tests. It’s a team game, win together, lose together. He won’t get that blame from within the dressing room and rightly so.

But you carry on slagging him off. He’s a pretty complex individual who (wrongly in my opinion) listens to a bit too much external noise and enjoys giving it back to the haters.

If it’s a passionate Englishmen out their doing his best Vs @maaarsh and his merry team of trollers, then we can only hope there’s one winner 😊

Posted
29 minutes ago, maaarsh said:

He's can't un drop the catches that already cost the Ashes unfortunately, so unless he has a time machine proving his doubters wrong is an impossible task.

Sadly yes.

He's not the only one to make mistakes in fairness; some odd batting, dropped catches elsewhere, and a potentially off declaration all of which have contributed, but there is a weakness to the specific role he's given, and at his age, it's not likely to suddenly improve.

I feel for him in a way, he should just be free to bat as we know he can.

Posted

Just struck me that we're finishing the series in July. Thought it seemed stupidly early so had a quick check.

2005, first test only starting about now.

5th test was in September.

 

 

Posted
2 minutes ago, mickbrown said:

Just struck me that we're finishing the series in July. Thought it seemed stupidly early so had a quick check.

2005, first test only starting about now.

5th test was in September.

 

 

Yeh, really early.

Think they have done it, so that the 100 (wrongly in my opinion) can run as the main spectacle throughout August.

Posted
25 minutes ago, mickbrown said:

Just struck me that we're finishing the series in July. Thought it seemed stupidly early so had a quick check.

2005, first test only starting about now.

5th test was in September.

 

 

There's no first class cricket being played in August so they can instead accommodate the ECB's vanity project

Posted
1 hour ago, desperado said:

Yeh, really early.

Think they have done it, so that the 100 (wrongly in my opinion) can run as the main spectacle throughout August.

Ah, didn't realise there was a reason

 

Posted

What a fascinating series it’s been. No side has been able to get away from the other (the only team that has looked likely to do that was us at OT) 

It’s been really entertaining cricket. Yes we’ve riden our luck giving a few chances, but the England of old would have been tentative and ponderous losing wickets for few runs. 

Sticking to their guns with this aggressive approach, means at least the scoreboard looks healthy with 3 wickets down. 

Posted
43 minutes ago, Tonge moor green jacket said:

Big if, but 300 wouldn't be bad first innings.

Pitch will get better for batting so Aussies may well get more, but they will have to bat last, and it might be turning by then.

Kind of, but they bat normally, rather than suicidally, for 2 days, then it’s over.

Posted
31 minutes ago, globaldiver said:

Kind of, but they bat normally, rather than suicidally, for 2 days, then it’s over.

Of course they could bat long, but it's down to the bowlers to extract what there is.

I think one or two of ours tried to go too early, but I don't think hanging around for very few would have made too much difference early doors- bound to be a delivery with their name on it.

Posted
1 hour ago, globaldiver said:

Proper cricket

Tedious, but you can't blame them. 

Even by proper cricket standards, that was unduly dull.

Got to say, I think Anderson has lost his mojo, sadly.

Over recent years, although he has still taken wickets, there had been a suggestion on commentary, that he bowls a tad too short.

They've said the same this morning on tms, and I wonder why, on an overcast morning, he isn't doing what he made his name doing- pitching it up a bit and giving it chance to swing.

Bowling "well" as they've described it, but isn't quite as threatening as he used to be. Shame, but maybe now is the time to look elsewhere ready for the next Ashes etc.

Posted
16 minutes ago, Tonge moor green jacket said:

Tedious, but you can't blame them. 

Even by proper cricket standards, that was unduly dull.

Got to say, I think Anderson has lost his mojo, sadly.

Over recent years, although he has still taken wickets, there had been a suggestion on commentary, that he bowls a tad too short.

They've said the same this morning on tms, and I wonder why, on an overcast morning, he isn't doing what he made his name doing- pitching it up a bit and giving it chance to swing.

Bowling "well" as they've described it, but isn't quite as threatening as he used to be. Shame, but maybe now is the time to look elsewhere ready for the next Ashes etc.

Commentators have consistently said that he’s bowling at the same pace, but I think he’s dropped off from 85mph to early 80s. He was swinging it just before lunch.

Posted
25 minutes ago, Tonge moor green jacket said:

Tedious, but you can't blame them. 

Even by proper cricket standards, that was unduly dull.

Got to say, I think Anderson has lost his mojo, sadly.

Over recent years, although he has still taken wickets, there had been a suggestion on commentary, that he bowls a tad too short.

They've said the same this morning on tms, and I wonder why, on an overcast morning, he isn't doing what he made his name doing- pitching it up a bit and giving it chance to swing.

Bowling "well" as they've described it, but isn't quite as threatening as he used to be. Shame, but maybe now is the time to look elsewhere ready for the next Ashes etc.

Interesting possibles for the next Ashes squad. Many of the batsmen are young enough and might be at their peak then, but the bowling will need an almost complete overhaul. Let’s hope the key man, Stokes, is up for it.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.