6 coppers to take him down or 1 member of the public with his bike? 
 

 

 

Reimmigration March in Manchester with estimated 500 people..

 

All walking cheating "Tommy Robinson".. doesn't help your cause imo..

7 minutes ago, gonzo said:

Surprised Oliver is such a popular Muslim name.

2 hours ago, Tonge moor green jacket said:

It wouldn't exist, if other channels were completely impartial.

No channel can be COMPLETELY impartial, because human beings have all got their own unique set of biases. But lots of channels at least attempt to be, including the BBC. Good journalists are aware their own biases and should try to work around them. If not - a good editor should keep them in check. 

GB News is probably the only news channel (except perhaps for C4 News) that has an 'agenda' - that I can think of in the UK. 

I know the BBC are doing something right because they come in for equal amounts of stick from the left AND the right wings. Which generally means they are striking a balance and you won't always be spoon fed what you want to hear. 

17 hours ago, Sweep said:

Can't argue, it's really impressive. Other than the steward of our village club, I don't know anybody who admits to watching it

Oh yes you do. 

2 hours ago, DirtySanchez said:

Utter bollocks 

Is GB News completely impartial? 

If the answer is a no then it exists because other channels are impartial 

Otherwise it can't spread its message out as freely 

Not utter bollocks but possibly ever so slightly badly worded.

If the other news programmes were unbiased it wouldn't exist. They aren't - they lean left and are sickeningly woke. The way they frame the news is incorrigible but you have to open your eyes and ears.

Look at that Scottish bint on the BBC who follows Trump around (Sarah summat - blonde with big tits). Keeps mentioning that 'Trumps name is mentioned in the Epstein report'. Keeps hammering it because shit sticks. For all we know it might say words to the effect of Trump distancing himself from the nonce once he had feedback on Epsteins nefarious activities. But no, she has to keep trying to chip away.

I'll never forget Truss running to a car in torrential rain in Liverpool and the BBC News framed it as 'Liz Truss couldn't get away from the meeting quickly enough'.

Biased bastards. Biased anti semitic bastards based on their recent efforts.

22 minutes ago, kent_white said:

No channel can be COMPLETELY impartial, because human beings have all got their own unique set of biases. But lots of channels at least attempt to be, including the BBC. Good journalists are aware their own biases and should try to work around them. If not - a good editor should keep them in check. 

GB News is probably the only news channel (except perhaps for C4 News) that has an 'agenda' - that I can think of in the UK. 

I know the BBC are doing something right because they come in for equal amounts of stick from the left AND the right wings. Which generally means they are striking a balance and you won't always be spoon fed what you want to hear. 

Couldn't disagree more about the BBC but as they generally reflect your position on most things I am not surprised in the slightest that you think they are OK.

If it were up to me, a dose of salts would be put through the place to clear out the lefties and wokes.

2 minutes ago, bolty58 said:

Not utter bollocks but possibly ever so slightly badly worded.

If the other news programmes were unbiased it wouldn't exist. They aren't - they lean left and are sickeningly woke. The way they frame the news is incorrigible but you have to open your eyes and ears.

Look at that Scottish bint on the BBC who follows Trump around (Sarah summat - blonde with big tits). Keeps mentioning that 'Trumps name is mentioned in the Epstein report'. Keeps hammering it because shit sticks. For all we know it might say words to the effect of Trump distancing himself from the nonce once he had feedback on Epsteins nefarious activities. But no, she has to keep trying to chip away.

I'll never forget Truss running to a car in torrential rain in Liverpool and the BBC News framed it as 'Liz Truss couldn't get away from the meeting quickly enough'.

Biased bastards. Biased anti semitic bastards based on their recent efforts.

Priceless 😂😂

Tbf I guess that’s why different media channels exist. We can all watch what we want to watch. We can listen to what we want to hear, or be challenged by alternative views (but not facts - there has to be a single truth). Democracy 👍

1 hour ago, tomski said:

Surprised Oliver is such a popular Muslim name.

Ollie oh Akhbar

1 hour ago, gonzo said:

Doesn’t it just means Muslims are less creative with names and aren’t calling their kids Jaxxon and shite like that?

40 minutes ago, bolty58 said:

Not utter bollocks but possibly ever so slightly badly worded.

If the other news programmes were unbiased it wouldn't exist. They aren't - they lean left and are sickeningly woke. The way they frame the news is incorrigible but you have to open your eyes and ears.

Look at that Scottish bint on the BBC who follows Trump around (Sarah summat - blonde with big tits). Keeps mentioning that 'Trumps name is mentioned in the Epstein report'. Keeps hammering it because shit sticks. For all we know it might say words to the effect of Trump distancing himself from the nonce once he had feedback on Epsteins nefarious activities. But no, she has to keep trying to chip away.

I'll never forget Truss running to a car in torrential rain in Liverpool and the BBC News framed it as 'Liz Truss couldn't get away from the meeting quickly enough'.

Biased bastards. Biased anti semitic bastards based on their recent efforts.

You mustn't have been watching when Laura Kuessenberg followed Boris Johnson round everywhere

17 minutes ago, DirtySanchez said:

You mustn't have been watching when Laura Kuessenberg followed Boris Johnson round everywhere

Obviously he wasnt

Bolty does not need to learn anything he just needs something to tell him hes right

I hope all Australians aren't like him

 

When you have the home office own figures saying foreign nationals are 70 percent more likely to commit sex crimes than British nationals  ( and out of that 30 percent of brits are actually off Pakistani origin ect ) and asylum seekers causing 6 out of 10 sexual assaults in London just shows you were the country is heading it will be like Afghanistan were woman can only go out with a male chaperon  

Edited August 2, 2025Aug 2 by Farnywhite

1 minute ago, Farnywhite said:

When you have the home office own figures saying foreign nationals are 70 percent more likely to commit sex crimes than British nationals  and asylum seekers causing 6 out of 10 sexual assaults in London just shows you were the country is heading it will be like Afghanistan were woman can only go out with a male chaperon  

Post your sources for these figures.

3 minutes ago, Farnywhite said:

When you have the home office own figures saying foreign nationals are 70 percent more likely to commit sex crimes than British nationals  ( and out of that 30 percent of brits are actually off Pakistani origin ect ) and asylum seekers causing 6 out of 10 sexual assaults in London just shows you were the country is heading it will be like Afghanistan were woman can only go out with a male chaperon  

Would be interested to see where these stats are from 

11 minutes ago, only1swanny said:

Would be interested to see where these stats are from 

Widely reported everywhere quick google search 

home office figures on foreign nationals sexual assault

3 minutes ago, Farnywhite said:

Widely reported everywhere quick google search 

home office figures on foreign nationals sexual assault

First sentence on google after searching that:

The Home Office does not collect or publish specific statistics on sexual assault rates among foreign nationals separately from the general population.

3 hours ago, bolty58 said:

Couldn't disagree more about the BBC but as they generally reflect your position on most things I am not surprised in the slightest that you think they are OK.

If it were up to me, a dose of salts would be put through the place to clear out the lefties and wokes.

They absolutely don't reflect my position on most things 😁

Sometimes they do - sometimes they don't. I prefer old style news where they just tell you what's happened and leave all the opinion to one side.

Anyway - you'd have no idea seen as you have a blanket ban on anything coming out of the beeb 😉

Speaking of biased, 2 of the 4 Reform MPs have their own show on GB news, with the others being regular guests on at least once a week. 

They've now added that odious cunt Jake "The Snake" Berry to their roster.

Certainly, if you like incessant updates about immigrants (I swear it's about 100 times a day), then it's the news channel for you.

Edited August 2, 2025Aug 2 by jmjhb

I don't think MPs of any stripe should have their own show, whether radio or TV

I'd probably extend that to the spouses of MPs as well

Apropos of nothing, Thomas Skinner on Twitter annoys me

1 hour ago, Cheese said:

First sentence on google after searching that:

The Home Office does not collect or publish specific statistics on sexual assault rates among foreign nationals separately from the general population.

This comes to next 

From the ministry of justice 

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/03/10/foreigners-commit-up-to-quarter-of-sex-crimes/

 

1 hour ago, Farnywhite said:

When you have the home office own figures saying foreign nationals are 70 percent more likely to commit sex crimes than British nationals  ( and out of that 30 percent of brits are actually off Pakistani origin ect ) and asylum seekers causing 6 out of 10 sexual assaults in London just shows you were the country is heading it will be like Afghanistan were woman can only go out with a male chaperon  

The figures are off however the correct figures still aren’t complimentary of foreign nationals

So Farny is just spreading some Far-Right shite. What a surprise.

1 hour ago, Lt. Aldo Raine said:

I don't think MPs of any stripe should have their own show, whether radio or TV

I'd probably extend that to the spouses of MPs as well

If GB News is a news channel MPs can have a show on there but the channel has to follow certain impartiality and factuality based rules which they currently don't.

If GB News wants to ignore the rules for news channels they can be an entertainment channel but can't then have sitting MPs hosting their own shows.

Or if Ofcom isn't going to make them chose one way or the other as they currently aren't then GB News can carry on regardless.