bolty58 Posted October 3, 2025 Posted October 3, 2025 18 hours ago, DazBob said: It's not semantics. @crawshawboothasked if "Pakistani racist comments" were allowed. Nobody is disputing that Pakistani abusers/rapists should be locked up for a very long time. Same applies to anyone from anywhere. You, on the other hand, happily turn a blind eye to it if you happen to admire the perpetrator . What a load of absolute fucking bollocks. If you have actual undeniable proof of the child abusing guilt of those I 'admire' then post it. As I have said previously I will happily escort any of them to the gallows with you once this proof is incontrovertible. Quote
Not in Crawley Posted October 3, 2025 Posted October 3, 2025 (edited) 3 hours ago, bolty58 said: What a load of absolute fucking bollocks. If you have actual undeniable proof of the child abusing guilt of those I 'admire' then post it. As I have said previously I will happily escort any of them to the gallows with you once this proof is incontrovertible. Sorry, but that is actual semantics. You support a man who is on tape saying he grabs women by the pussy. You are making a delination between what you deem acceptable because you support someone's political position. We all know if one of your political bete noire's was best friends with a sex trafficking pedophile who hanged themselves when caught then we'd never hear the end of it. You've got the political radar of a blind man in a coal shed because you dont know much about politics to be fair. You were right about Emery though (until this season) Edited October 3, 2025 by Not in Crawley Quote
DazBob Posted October 3, 2025 Posted October 3, 2025 No matter what proof comes out Bolty will just say it's AI, someone lying, etc. Quote
Cheese Posted October 3, 2025 Posted October 3, 2025 16 minutes ago, Not in Crawley said: Sorry, but that is actual semantics. You support a man who is on tape saying he grabs women by the pussy. You are making a delination between what you deem acceptable because you support someone's political position. We all know if one of your political bete noire's was best friends with a sex trafficking pedophile who hanged themselves when caught then we'd never hear the end of it. You've got the political radar of a blind man in a coal shed because you dont know much about politics to be fair. You were right about Emery though (until this season) Trump does seem to have a habit of associating with paedo's. https://www.newsweek.com/robert-morris-texas-megachurch-pastor-child-sex-abuse-10820878 Quote
bolty58 Posted October 3, 2025 Posted October 3, 2025 1 hour ago, Not in Crawley said: Sorry, but that is actual semantics. You support a man who is on tape saying he grabs women by the pussy. You are making a delination between what you deem acceptable because you support someone's political position. We all know if one of your political bete noire's was best friends with a sex trafficking pedophile who hanged themselves when caught then we'd never hear the end of it. You've got the political radar of a blind man in a coal shed because you dont know much about politics to be fair. You were right about Emery though (until this season) You are a fucking moonman. I knew it was a mistake but I will persevere. 'Support' is an interesting word. There is plenty the man believes in that I most certainly don't. Abortion for example. I do like the way he rankles your sort though. I'll hand you an olive branch of sorts. If it is proved beyond dispute that The Don is a paedophile I will wear a keffiyeh and winklepickers. Only for one minute mind. I wouldn't want to look like an utter cunt for any longer than that. Quote
bolty58 Posted October 3, 2025 Posted October 3, 2025 1 hour ago, DazBob said: No matter what proof comes out Bolty will just say it's AI, someone lying, etc. Whatever happens DazBOb will talk shite. Quote
Not in Crawley Posted October 3, 2025 Posted October 3, 2025 1 hour ago, bolty58 said: You are a fucking moonman. I knew it was a mistake but I will persevere. 'Support' is an interesting word. There is plenty the man believes in that I most certainly don't. Abortion for example. I do like the way he rankles your sort though. I'll hand you an olive branch of sorts. If it is proved beyond dispute that The Don is a paedophile I will wear a keffiyeh and winklepickers. Only for one minute mind. I wouldn't want to look like an utter cunt for any longer than that. I dont take olive branches from those that deal in absolutes. They inverably are fools and best avoided. You keep peddling your defense, its a bit sad but its quite entertaining in an odd way. You can whack me back on ignore now. Quote
bolty58 Posted October 3, 2025 Posted October 3, 2025 2 hours ago, Not in Crawley said: I dont take olive branches from those that deal in absolutes. They inverably are fools and best avoided. You keep peddling your defense, its a bit sad but its quite entertaining in an odd way. You can whack me back on ignore now. No, not yet. Quote
Lt. Aldo Raine Posted October 21, 2025 Posted October 21, 2025 I see three members of the survivor's panel have quit before the inquiry's even started Quote
crawshawbooth Posted October 22, 2025 Posted October 22, 2025 16 hours ago, Lt. Aldo Raine said: I see three members of the survivor's panel have quit before the inquiry's even started There is clearly something wrong with these young women after being repeatedly raped , drugged and abused. Why would they object to a retired police inspector or ex social worker heading up this enquiry ? I think there should be a joint chair from both services to ensure a complete cover up Quote
crawshawbooth Posted October 22, 2025 Posted October 22, 2025 2 minutes ago, crawshawbooth said: There is clearly something wrong with these young women after being repeatedly raped , drugged and abused. Why would they object to a retired police inspector or ex social worker heading up this enquiry ? I think there should be a joint chair from both services to ensure a complete cover up I have been reminded today of the interview in 1978 on BBC radio when Johnny Rotten called out Jimmy Saville and his like then got banned by the BBC It was 30 + years before the rest of the world caught up Quote
Tonge moor green jacket Posted October 22, 2025 Posted October 22, 2025 16 minutes ago, crawshawbooth said: There is clearly something wrong with these young women after being repeatedly raped , drugged and abused. Why would they object to a retired police inspector or ex social worker heading up this enquiry ? I think there should be a joint chair from both services to ensure a complete cover up Absolutely. I watched an interview with a survivor last night and she was livid. Called out Jess Phillips for essentially calling her a liar. Then she spoke about her abuse, and how the police were complicit in it. Gobsmacking revelations. The whole preliminary stage seems rotten, let alone the future inquiry. Need a foreign judge or similar to head it up. Or maybe a senior military official. Quote
London Wanderer Posted October 22, 2025 Posted October 22, 2025 12 minutes ago, Tonge moor green jacket said: Absolutely. I watched an interview with a survivor last night and she was livid. Called out Jess Phillips for essentially calling her a liar. Then she spoke about her abuse, and how the police were complicit in it. Gobsmacking revelations. The whole preliminary stage seems rotten, let alone the future inquiry. Need a foreign judge or similar to head it up. Or maybe a senior military official. Not surprised They don’t seem to be getting much better either. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/ceq0jx7ljn9o.amp No wonder so many women choose not to come forward. Quote
bolty58 Posted October 22, 2025 Posted October 22, 2025 4 hours ago, Tonge moor green jacket said: Absolutely. I watched an interview with a survivor last night and she was livid. Called out Jess Phillips for essentially calling her a liar. Then she spoke about her abuse, and how the police were complicit in it. Gobsmacking revelations. The whole preliminary stage seems rotten, let alone the future inquiry. Need a foreign judge or similar to head it up. Or maybe a senior military official. A fucking disgrace but you just knew they would concoct a way in the interests of 'social cohesion'. There's a good chance they might get the opposite of social cohesion if the general public see through their further cover up efforts. Quote
miamiwhite Posted October 22, 2025 Posted October 22, 2025 6 minutes ago, bolty58 said: A fucking disgrace but you just knew they would concoct a way in the interests of 'social cohesion'. There's a good chance they might get the opposite of social cohesion if the general public see through their further cover up efforts. So many on here silent on this subject Not exactly Quelle Surprise with those lot Quote
Tonge moor green jacket Posted October 22, 2025 Posted October 22, 2025 How on earth us it appropriate for the charity doing the groundwork to ask the victims if they want to widen the scope? This is the very essence of why the inquiry was brought in- to focus specifically in one area. Putting pressure on them, and also issuing guidance on what questions they should ask, and then insisting they are submitted in advance. Thankfully, the second candidate for the chair has now withdrawn, and has expressed his anger and dissatisfaction at the process. Also suggesting political interference. Couldn't make this up. Genuine conspiracy at the heart of the establishment. Quote
miamiwhite Posted October 22, 2025 Posted October 22, 2025 Only folk on here who find that behaviour acceptable are nonces, ponces, lefties, teachers and rape fantasies lovers....it's as simple as that Quote
Spider Posted October 22, 2025 Posted October 22, 2025 The police and authorities being shit scared of the Muslim community and looking like racists is to blame. It doesn’t necessarily make them Muslim sympathisers, it more likely means they were scared of the reaction if they said what they really thought. Plus ca change Quote
Tonge moor green jacket Posted October 22, 2025 Posted October 22, 2025 16 minutes ago, Spider said: The police and authorities being shit scared of the Muslim community and looking like racists is to blame. It doesn’t necessarily make them Muslim sympathisers, it more likely means they were scared of the reaction if they said what they really thought. Plus ca change Absolutely. Nevertheless, when police are engaged in some of the incidents, and councillors etc rumoured to be involved, then there are without doubt some sympathisers amongst them. Similarly, if anyone knew this, but turned a blind eye, then they're complicit in the crime. Sir Khan's previous comments are now being shown to be bollocks, and I wouldn't be overly surprised to find out that he knew too, but did fuck all. Quote
Ani Posted October 23, 2025 Posted October 23, 2025 It is good to see the whole issue getting so much attention, whereas even on here when @miamiwhite and I talked about it a few years ago it was dismissed as nonsense. I honestly think Baroness Casey is the most suitable to chair this and not sure why she was not appointed to a clear role much earlier The thing that is not being talked about is that not all the victims agree about how this should progress and the idea that Badenoch can lecture anyone on it is a fucking joke. I am not going to criticise those victims who feel the process is not working for them but equally can not criticise those who support its direction. Quote
Spider Posted October 23, 2025 Posted October 23, 2025 2 hours ago, Ani said: It is good to see the whole issue getting so much attention, whereas even on here when @miamiwhite and I talked about it a few years ago it was dismissed as nonsense. I honestly think Baroness Casey is the most suitable to chair this and not sure why she was not appointed to a clear role much earlier The thing that is not being talked about is that not all the victims agree about how this should progress and the idea that Badenoch can lecture anyone on it is a fucking joke. I am not going to criticise those victims who feel the process is not working for them but equally can not criticise those who support its direction. Not sure it was dismissed by everyone. Plenty of us have pointed out that muslim gangs have been active for years and authorities have been slow to act, in my opinion for fear of being accused of racism. The truth is that there are muslim gangs, white gangs and gangs with rapists of all backgrounds. It's easy to see that muslims make up a disproportionate amount of them given their numbers in the UK. I don't think a single person on here would be anything other than appalled by both the crimes and the slow reaction from authorities. We've all known about it for years. The important thing is that lessons are learned and these gangs are stopped wherever they are. To accuse the current government is churlish. This has been going on for years, under different administrations. Worth noting that ongoing police investigations rely on secrecy and discretion. Justice can easily be denied when people interfere and give the criminals a get out. Quote
London Wanderer Posted October 23, 2025 Posted October 23, 2025 18 hours ago, miamiwhite said: Only folk on here who find that behaviour acceptable are nonces, ponces, lefties, teachers and rape fantasies lovers....it's as simple as that What are you on about? Quote
miamiwhite Posted October 23, 2025 Posted October 23, 2025 1 minute ago, London Wanderer said: What are you on about? Stop the deflection from my last post Quote
Cheese Posted October 23, 2025 Posted October 23, 2025 Just now, London Wanderer said: What are you on about? Miami lives in his own little world where he thinks everyone watches the same online shite as him, at exactly the same time, and therefore we all know the real meaning of the cryptic bollocks he posts, but we choose to ignore it because we've got hidden agendas. The old fella really isn't well. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.