Jump to content
Wanderers Ways. Neil Thompson 1961-2021

Recommended Posts

Posted

Unless Sharon dumps her shares to a Saudi billionaire I don’t think much dosh will be going on a goalie seeing as it’s the least of our problems. Hutchinson has been given a deal and may well be Southwood’s back up with Baxter’s salary going into the pot for recruitment elsewhere - we just don’t know the rebuild budget.

 At this stage the retained list looks as much a cost cutting exercise as deck clearance  but we’ll know more when the meat market gets into full swing.

Posted

Stockport, Orient, Wycombe and  Charlton. Who’d have thought they have better teams than us? Not me TBH. Something fundamentally has to change. How well we are equipped to make the necessary changes I genuinely don’t know but I have little choice but to back Schumacher to do it now.

Posted
7 minutes ago, Wanderlust said:

Unless Sharon dumps her shares to a Saudi billionaire I don’t think much dosh will be going on a goalie seeing as it’s the least of our problems. Hutchinson has been given a deal and may well be Southwood’s back up with Baxter’s salary going into the pot for recruitment elsewhere - we just don’t know the rebuild budget.

 At this stage the retained list looks as much a cost cutting exercise as deck clearance  but we’ll know more when the meat market gets into full swing.

If we accept that Southwood is a downgrade on Baxter of a year ago, and Hutch is a downgrade on Southwood or Coleman as backups, I wouldn't say GK is the least of our problems.  As soon as Southwood gets injured, it arguably becomes our biggest problem, and even if he stays fit its still an area that can be improved.

We've lost a top L1 keeper, there's no logic at all in not replacing him for me.

Posted (edited)

My interpretation of Baxter leaving is that, if SS was unsure who his number 1 was, then get rid of one and buy a better one.

New keeper incoming who (he thinks) is better than Baxter 

Edited by desperado
Posted
3 minutes ago, desperado said:

My interpretation of Baxter leaving is that, if SS was unsure who his number 1 was, then get rid of one and buy a better one.

New keeper incoming who (he thinks) is better than Baxter 

Agreed.  Not replacing him just isn't an option IMO.  And keepers are relatively easy to sign on frees or loans because if they aren't 1st choice they aren't happy, its a unique situation compared to outfield players.

Posted
8 hours ago, desperado said:

My interpretation of Baxter leaving is that, if SS was unsure who his number 1 was, then get rid of one and buy a better one.

New keeper incoming who (he thinks) is better than Baxter 

Or, he thinks both a capable, and will focus on one, with perhaps another to be a bench warmer for the most part.

8 hours ago, Johnnyrotten said:

Agreed.  Not replacing him just isn't an option IMO.  And keepers are relatively easy to sign on frees or loans because if they aren't 1st choice they aren't happy, its a unique situation compared to outfield players.

There's a rather obvious flaw in your point.

If we bring in someone to be the primary keeper, then by definition, Southwood becomes unhappy, and wants away.

Posted
1 hour ago, Tonge moor green jacket said:

Or, he thinks both a capable, and will focus on one, with perhaps another to be a bench warmer for the most part.

There's a rather obvious flaw in your point.

If we bring in someone to be the primary keeper, then by definition, Southwood becomes unhappy, and wants away.

I think that’s part of the plan and why we’ve given Hutch a new contract. Southwood certainly won’t want to be a definite No2 again and I believe will seek pastures new. Neither Baxter or Southwood have proved good enough and it’s sensible to replace them both if possible and save two wages, three if you include Coleman. As for Hutch I have no problem with him being a stand in and don’t think he’ll let us down if called upon and we do have young keepers coming through in the youth and B Teams as well. A top keeper is what we’re missing.

Posted

Ms Brittan should be well aware of the need for at least two competent experienced keepers on the books. After she & Evatt both alluded to Baxter's injury costing us promotion in the 23/24 season.

Posted
49 minutes ago, Whitesince63 said:

I think that’s part of the plan and why we’ve given Hutch a new contract. Southwood certainly won’t want to be a definite No2 again and I believe will seek pastures new. Neither Baxter or Southwood have proved good enough and it’s sensible to replace them both if possible and save two wages, three if you include Coleman. As for Hutch I have no problem with him being a stand in and don’t think he’ll let us down if called upon and we do have young keepers coming through in the youth and B Teams as well. A top keeper is what we’re missing.

I get the impression Hutch will be Coleman's replacement rather than the back-up

Posted
2 hours ago, Lt. Aldo Raine said:

I get the impression Hutch will be Coleman's replacement rather than the back-up

Yep. He’ll be out on loan again with the option to call him back if needed. Think he’s well rated within the club though. Just not ready yet. 

Posted
7 hours ago, Tonge moor green jacket said:

Or, he thinks both a capable, and will focus on one, with perhaps another to be a bench warmer for the most part.

There's a rather obvious flaw in your point.

If we bring in someone to be the primary keeper, then by definition, Southwood becomes unhappy, and wants away.

Its never dressed up that way with two "proven" keepers eg Southwood and Baxter, they are just told at start of season to battle it out for the no.1 spot.  If one hasn't started a league game by Christmas then yes he'd be looking to leave in January maybe.  But he's under contract so if we want to keep him as no.2 we keep him to the end of the season.  

There will be champ teams who have a clear no.1 and a decent back up keeper who's not prepared to hang around any more, they are the types we could get (like Baxter was IIRC).  Or young unproven Prem/champ loans with potential.

Posted (edited)
18 hours ago, Johnnyrotten said:

Its never dressed up that way with two "proven" keepers eg Southwood and Baxter, they are just told at start of season to battle it out for the no.1 spot.  If one hasn't started a league game by Christmas then yes he'd be looking to leave in January maybe.  But he's under contract so if we want to keep him as no.2 we keep him to the end of the season.  

There will be champ teams who have a clear no.1 and a decent back up keeper who's not prepared to hang around any more, they are the types we could get (like Baxter was IIRC).  Or young unproven Prem/champ loans with potential.

Or a 34+ years old with bags of experience in the top two divisions (or Swiss for example) who knows his career's begining to run down but has lots still to offer.

Edited by Dr. Feelgood
Posted
On 08/05/2025 at 11:22, Lancaster18 said:

Think the fans need to look at themselves after some of the santos comments, clearly our best cb and will be a big loss as seen this season.

Probably the same set of fans that think schon was player of the season.

I think people need to realise he had hardly any stick. Fucking hell it was a few kids on twitter. 

he is clearly soft mentally and wasn't interested in staying. No issue but lets not pretend we lost a world class player. he was good when his pace allowed him to recover his mistakes. his pace via this injury seems to have left him a little so he was poor. 

Posted
51 minutes ago, Big E said:

I think people need to realise he had hardly any stick. Fucking hell it was a few kids on twitter. 

he is clearly soft mentally and wasn't interested in staying. No issue but lets not pretend we lost a world class player. he was good when his pace allowed him to recover his mistakes. his pace via this injury seems to have left him a little so he was poor. 

Whatever the rights and wrongs of it all are, the fact is he wasn't the same player. 

He wanted out and has gone.

History now, look forward to seeing the re-build.

Posted
34 minutes ago, gonzo said:

Why any professional footballer is on twitter or better still reads the comment's is beyond me.

Santos on his day was a beast of a defender but those days wained by the second. He was a massive victim of our silly slow tepid build up and him standing on the ball will be more synonymous with his time here than being one of the best defenders in the league.

After that play off final the cunts got off lightly. We sold bags of season tickets, sold out most aways and were there with a near full house at start of season. 

That's what you judge support on not reading some 14 year olds on twitter. 

The big soft sulky mardy twat.

toxic

Posted (edited)

If your a professional footballer and you get abuse on twitter or whatever platform  it could be any fucker on the wind up Wigan , bury fan ect if your Bolton .

fucking hell mcclean gets it daily seems to revel in it 

block the cunts and if it’s something serious get the police involved but why fuck your own career by sulking and moving on 

Edited by Farnywhite
Posted

Points to why he never played at a higher level and only found himself at L1 relatively late in his career.

He proved that he had the physical attributes to be more than good enough in this league and probably make it in the Champ if he’d have made L1 earlier in his career. That he didn’t is all between his ears for me.

Posted
4 hours ago, Farnywhite said:

If your a professional footballer and you get abuse on twitter or whatever platform  it could be any fucker on the wind up Wigan , bury fan ect if your Bolton .

fucking hell mcclean gets it daily seems to revel in it 

block the cunts and if it’s something serious get the police involved but why fuck your own career by sulking and moving on 

Because he isn't weak as piss 

Posted (edited)

To be honest I’m glad he’s gone, he fucking stunk the place out and was a walking liability.  Shit me up numerous times, it was akin to watching campo at centre half fucking about with it. Fortunately Big Sam got onto that one quickly and shifted him forward one.

This club was the pinnacle of his career regardless of his or his Mrs’ egos. Fucking shit and good riddance.

Glad I got that off my chest 😎

Edited by bwfc4ife
Posted

Really rated him highly for the most part, obviously had some stupid mistakes in & wasn't the most focused of defender but on a free transfer with not much expected of him he did well relatively speaking. Just a shame we didn't cash in on him when his stock was high enough at a good age, same with Sheehan if we don't do with him at least we managed to shift Dion before he was completely finished. Don't really care where Santos ends up, I doubt he'll play much anyway I think Evatt ran his faves into the ground & the likes of Toal, Baxter, Dion, Santos, Demps haven't got over playing through specific injuries when our fixture schedule was chaotic.

Posted
13 hours ago, Eddie said:

Points to why he never played at a higher level and only found himself at L1 relatively late in his career.

 

CVs rarely lie.

Posted
11 hours ago, Deanu said:

Really rated him highly for the most part, obviously had some stupid mistakes in & wasn't the most focused of defender but on a free transfer with not much expected of him he did well relatively speaking. Just a shame we didn't cash in on him when his stock was high enough at a good age, same with Sheehan if we don't do with him at least we managed to shift Dion before he was completely finished. Don't really care where Santos ends up, I doubt he'll play much anyway I think Evatt ran his faves into the ground & the likes of Toal, Baxter, Dion, Santos, Demps haven't got over playing through specific injuries when our fixture schedule was chaotic.

no ones ever wanted them

Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, L/H White said:

no ones ever wanted them

Not sure that’s true but if you seriously want promotion you don’t sell your best players and promotion was our stated aim.

Edited by Whitesince63
Spelling

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.