freds dad Posted October 3, 2013 Posted October 3, 2013 Can any of you good people recommend a good 40 year old malt? It's a friends 40th birthday soon, he likes a good whiskey so I though a combination of the two as a present. Quote
Maggie Tate Posted October 3, 2013 Posted October 3, 2013 It will be expensive as a motherfucker. http://www.masterofmalt.com/age/40-year-old-whisky/ Quote
Krimzon Posted October 3, 2013 Posted October 3, 2013 At 40 years old they should all be good. I use this place and find it very helpful....... http://www.thewhiskyexchange.com/ Quote
little whitt Posted October 3, 2013 Posted October 3, 2013 Can any of you good people recommend a good 40 year old malt? It's a friends 40th birthday soon, he likes a good whiskey so I though a combination of the two as a present. for that kind of money you friend must have wanked you off more then once Quote
Whites man Posted October 3, 2013 Posted October 3, 2013 for that kind of money you friend must have wanked you off more then once I bet 40 year old Matt has wanked you off Whitt. Quote
jules_darby Posted October 3, 2013 Posted October 3, 2013 A good Matt that will be 40 in November http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matt_Clarke_(footballer_born_1973) Quote
Exiled Girl Posted October 3, 2013 Posted October 3, 2013 Can any of you good people recommend a good 40 year old malt? It's a friends 40th birthday soon, he likes a good whiskey so I though a combination of the two as a present. Whiskey or whisky? (i.e Irish or Scotch). And does he prefer peated or non peated? Quote
Exiled Girl Posted October 3, 2013 Posted October 3, 2013 Anyhow, the expert says a 40 year old will be expensive and not necessarily that great. 2 x 20 year olds will be better Quote
Casino Posted October 3, 2013 Posted October 3, 2013 Anyhow, the expert says a 40 year old will be expensive and not necessarily that great. 2 x 20 year olds will be better you've spoken to meldrew? he'll recommend johnnie walker Quote
no balls Posted October 3, 2013 Posted October 3, 2013 Wine or Brandy might be a bit more reasonable Quote
Exiled Girl Posted October 3, 2013 Posted October 3, 2013 you've spoken to meldrew? he'll recommend johnnie walker No. We have a library/whisky room at home. We have enough whisky to sail & sink the bloody titanic. And he makes me keep my gin in the kitchen. Quote
freds dad Posted October 3, 2013 Author Posted October 3, 2013 Whiskey or whisky? (i.e Irish or Scotch). And does he prefer peated or non peated? Whisky. Not sure about the peat? Any actual recommendations? Quote
Exiled Girl Posted October 3, 2013 Posted October 3, 2013 If you bought me the finest peated whisky, I'd give it away, however my expert loves the stuff. This is his message to you " Kin ell. That'll be pricey. Also, not necessarily great. Don't really know anything that old, off the top of my head - check the Whisky Bible... " So, it's a case of checking the Bible later on. Quote
MickyD Posted October 3, 2013 Posted October 3, 2013 I reckon this stuff might be good but, as has been said, better than a couple of bottles of normal? http://www.masterofmalt.com/whiskies/pulteney/old-pulteney-40-year-old-whisky/ Quote
fester58 Posted October 3, 2013 Posted October 3, 2013 my mates just turned 40 bought him a bottle of carhu 12 yo. a lovely drop. don't bother with old whisky its too bloody expensive Quote
Whites man Posted October 3, 2013 Posted October 3, 2013 Anyhow, the expert says a 40 year old will be expensive and not necessarily that great. 2 x 20 year olds will be better Thinking like that only ends up in divorce. Quote
bryan_munich Posted October 3, 2013 Posted October 3, 2013 This is probably the best value 40 year old - most from decent distilleries will be over a grand. http://www.lfw.co.uk/acatalog/Glenfarclas-40yo-55722.html Quote
Exiled Girl Posted October 4, 2013 Posted October 4, 2013 The Glenfarcias 40yo gets 94/100 in Jim Murray's Whisky Bible, which is good, very good in fact, however you need to be sure it's not the freakishly disappointing 40 year old from last year. So, yes, it's good unless it's part of the bad bottling. Quote
Casino Posted October 4, 2013 Posted October 4, 2013 The Glenfarcias 40yo gets 94/100 in Jim Murray's Whisky Bible, which is good, very good in fact, however you need to be sure it's not the freakishly disappointing 40 year old from last year. So, yes, it's good unless it's part of the bad bottling. can KC not post himself? Quote
bryan_munich Posted October 4, 2013 Posted October 4, 2013 Hadn't heard of a bad bottling. The reason I'd heard it's so cheap (if you can call £300 cheap for a bottle of booze) is that Glenfarclas had an unusual amount of 40 yr old casks available and hence released a lot of bottles on to the market. One for the (albeit well heeled) drinker rather than the collector. Quote
Exiled Girl Posted October 5, 2013 Posted October 5, 2013 (edited) can KC not post himself?Incapable. And he was busy at work (unusual, I know! ) when the question was first asked. Not sure if it was a bad bottling or a bad bottle or a bad barrel that was reviewed in 2012, but Murray didn't rate it, however I can't check properly as I lent 2012 to someone & haven't yet had it returned. Anyhow, it was a good spot for a 40yo, as he gave it a really good rating in 2013 Edited October 5, 2013 by Exiled Girl Quote
Underpants Posted October 6, 2013 Posted October 6, 2013 Had a bottle of whyte and mackay bought for me this week. Not a whiskey drinker, but I can be. Quote
Traf Posted October 6, 2013 Posted October 6, 2013 Had a bottle of whyte and mackay bought for me this week. Not a whiskey drinker, but I can be. You'd drink meths if somebody else was buying. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.