What is that "mate" of mine Sadiq Khan trying to achieve ?

 

You lost you demented little cretin, get over it and concentrate on your job you terrorist sympathiser.

3 hours ago, miamiwhite said:

David Lammy is demented and deranged.

Everytime I've heard him speak (especially when he presents a show on LBC) I always think he comes across as very eloquent....whilst talking absolute nonsense. The fact, that he has risen to such a lofty position amazes me

49 minutes ago, Winchester White said:

Farage whining like a toddler again.

If it's too much maybe he can get back on Putin's payroll.

He's probably still on it.... 

If it's not that they're just shit, then they really do need to hire better comms people

 

12 hours ago, miamiwhite said:

David Lammy is demented and deranged.

....and an absolute cunt.

9 hours ago, Dimron said:

See my posting, although I'm not full on Reform (yet).

On a little tablet an can't cut and paste etc so can't give you the full on proposal

Spider is losing the plot. Reform don't stand in Australian elections.

9 hours ago, Sweep said:

He's probably still on it.... 

 The desperation is highly amusing.

I wonder if anyone is searching for Epstein links? Probably.

8 hours ago, Lt. Aldo Raine said:

If it's not that they're just shit, then they really do need to hire better comms people

 

It takes a lot of concerted effort to continually drive down your popularity ratings with pollsters. At least give them credit for that.

They are Reforms best cheerleader.

9 hours ago, Lt. Aldo Raine said:

If it's not that they're just shit, then they really do need to hire better comms people

 

We asked 100 people to name something British. You said painting fences.

10 hours ago, Dimron said:

See my posting, although I'm not full on Reform (yet).

On a little tablet an can't cut and paste etc so can't give you the full on proposal

Don't bother.

He is a serial poster of comments like this.

One of a small number.

Whenever someone responds, it is ignored, and them the same question is repeated at some later point.

It is easy to find information about any party- if you can be arsed.

You don't have to agree with those details, but they're there.

Anyway, this fella does analysis on various topics. He does get a bit wordy at times, but he approaches subjects from a "legal" view.

 

 

3 minutes ago, Tonge moor green jacket said:

Don't bother.

He is a serial poster of comments like this.

One of a small number.

Whenever someone responds, it is ignored, and them the same question is repeated at some later point.

It is easy to find information about any party- if you can be arsed.

You don't have to agree with those details, but they're there.

Anyway, this fella does analysis on various topics. He does get a bit wordy at times, but he approaches subjects from a "legal" view.

 

 

Who else is a serial poster of comments like this?

I don’t think you’ll like the answer, because I’ve done some research kidda

PS: ChatGPT can’t help you this time, I notice it’s starting to do your posts here and there

Edited October 1, 2025Oct 1 by Spider

1 hour ago, bolty58 said:

It takes a lot of concerted effort to continually drive down your popularity ratings with pollsters. At least give them credit for that.

They are Reforms best cheerleader.

Dream on!

Yes Labour still need to improve their comms big time, but I think what Starmer’s speech again showed is that he is at heart a decent man who puts the country first. Public service.

Nicely highlights that Farage on the other hand is a divisive grifter who knows he can only get into power by dividing groups and communities against each other. He’s being found out though.

I can hear normality and decency marching down the road again 😉.

56 minutes ago, wanderer1984 said:

We asked 100 people to name something British. You said painting fences.

Lovely standing ovation for the tax fiddler as well 

57 minutes ago, royal white said:

Lovely standing ovation for the tax fiddler as well 

😅😅

17 minutes ago, BobyBrno said:

😅😅

Not like the good old days hey. 
 

2 minutes ago, royal white said:

Not like the good old days hey. 
 

What’s that phrase ‘imitation is the sincerest form of flattery’?

He should have gone with this. Misread the mood of the room.😊

13 minutes ago, BobyBrno said:

What’s that phrase ‘imitation is the sincerest form of flattery’?

He should have gone with this. Misread the mood of the room.😊

They'll be listing Reform policies next.

I wonder what they are....?

So what is the WW alternative to RR's fiscal rules and overall direction?

And would it be seen as a drastic u-turn?

Burnham has touted something similar 

28 minutes ago, Dimron said:

So what is the WW alternative to RR's fiscal rules and overall direction?

And would it be seen as a drastic u-turn?

Burnham has touted something similar 

She should have reversed the NI reduction that Hunt brought in at the last Tory budget. She should not have promised ‘no tax increases’. Every economist I’ve read said that they were needed and still are. The NI increase on employers has backfired. She wanted to reduce the welfare bill at the spring statement but couldn’t get her own party to accept it.
Her weakness has led to higher borrowing and higher borrowing costs. She’s made it more difficult for herself because she got it wrong at her first attempt. It’s going to be tough all round. There’s more but I ain’t got the time. 
ps. Disappointed in Burnham’s comments on the economy. He ain’t the answer. Imo. 

4 hours ago, bolty58 said:

They are Reforms best cheerleader.

This^ 

13 hours ago, Lt. Aldo Raine said:

If it's not that they're just shit, then they really do need to hire better comms people

 

They just don't get it 

When people say make Britain great again and hark back to better days they're on about getting rid of all the darkies 

So out of touch, it's embarrassing 

14 minutes ago, BobyBrno said:

She should have reversed the NI reduction that Hunt brought in at the last Tory budget. She should not have promised ‘no tax increases’. Every economist I’ve read said that they were needed and still are. The NI increase on employers has backfired. She wanted to reduce the welfare bill at the spring statement but couldn’t get her own party to accept it.
Her weakness has led to higher borrowing and higher borrowing costs. She’s made it more difficult for herself because she got it wrong at her first attempt. It’s going to be tough all round. There’s more but I ain’t got the time. 
ps. Disappointed in Burnham’s comments on the economy. He ain’t the answer. Imo. 

Agreed regarding the "no tax increases", the fiscal rules would be more effective if the economy was growing. They got carried away during the election promising not to raise taxes on working folk. So to meet the rules and keep the promise she went for the employers and effectively stifled growth. So now she is stuck with zero growth and her rules... I call this Austerity.

Not taken much notice of Burnham but I did pick up on a comment from him about not playing along so much with the Bond Markets which was the essence of the Guardian Editorial... I think he knows that dropping these fiscal rules will be the end of The Starmer and Reeves Show and he sees an opportunity.

Good.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/oct/01/uk-government-wins-122m-pandemic-case-against-michelle-mone-linked-firm-over-faulty-ppe

i predict theres no cash left in that business

but starmer

4 minutes ago, Cheese said:

Good.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/oct/01/uk-government-wins-122m-pandemic-case-against-michelle-mone-linked-firm-over-faulty-ppe

 

Proper corrupt cunts those lot were