Underpants Posted September 11, 2025 Posted September 11, 2025 (edited) 22 hours ago, kent_white said: Somehow - we've all got to get back to being human beings again and not automatically hate someone just because they disagree with yiu about politics. I saw Tim Berners-Lee being interviewed yesterday. And he was explaining the algorithms job is to keep you locked in and engaging in the content. So it will deliberately show you things to become enraged about. His argument has that this has led to a lot of the polarisation we see in society and gives us a false view of the world really is. He essentially said the Internet had been monopolised by these huge companies - all keeping us scrolling with their negative algorithms. He said it should be outlawed. Social media firms should still He able to exist but with strict guidelines around hiw their algorithms work. Banned in the same way that we banned guns. Because it's so damaging to society. Remember when Facebook was good and it really was all your friends posting stupid shit all day about what they were doing? It's NOTHING like that now. I barely see any posts from my friends anymore. It's just adverts and videos to make me start doomscrolling. Fuck that shit - I'm done with it! Let's just start being decent with each other again. I'll put my pipe down now! 😁✌️☮️🕊 As far as I know I am a human being, and I don't want to kill anyone over what is said. And I'm assuming everyone in this forum is a human being too. But having said that, polarisation has always been with us. It has advanced in parallel with us since the Stone Age. I saw that Tim Berners-Lee interview too. Unfortunately Tim, Pandoras box has been opened and there is no going back! There is no going back to being human beings because we are human beings and that's the problem. Hate, on both sides, is a product of todays environment. This reality we live in now is the new normal. It's a case of how it's handled by the folk that live in it. There's more love in this world that hate. People need to be reminded of that sometimes. Edited September 11, 2025 by Underpants Quote
tyldesley_white Posted September 11, 2025 Posted September 11, 2025 (edited) 18 hours ago, bolty58 said: WTF? So was the guy who tried to assassinate Trump. Not another 'you just don't like brown skin' guilt tripper are you? But I was right and Royal was wrong, that was not the shooter nor the 2nd one that the FBI said they had, the FBI are 2 nil down at the moment, maybe they would be better served by finding the shooter before spreading shit on social media, once is bad enough but TWICE. Also remember the white gut you shot at Trump was a Republican. Edited September 11, 2025 by tyldesley_white Quote
Cheese Posted September 11, 2025 Posted September 11, 2025 3 minutes ago, tyldesley_white said: But I was right and Royal was wrong, that was not the shooter nor the 2nd one that the FBI said they had, the FBI are 2 nil down at the moment, maybe they would be better served by finding the shooter before spreading shit on social media, once is bad enough but TWICE. Also remember the white gut you shot at Trump was a Republican. Well Trump did fire the Director of the FBI and replace him with a bog-eyed Conspiracy Theorist, so it's hardly surprising that they're struggling. Quote
tyldesley_white Posted September 11, 2025 Posted September 11, 2025 2 minutes ago, Cheese said: Well Trump did fire the Director of the FBI and replace him with a bog-eyed Conspiracy Theorist, so it's hardly surprising that they're struggling. Which is a fair point, anyway still not found the shooter Quote
royal white Posted September 11, 2025 Posted September 11, 2025 13 minutes ago, tyldesley_white said: But I was right and Royal was wrong, that was not the shooter nor the 2nd one that the FBI said they had, the FBI are 2 nil down at the moment, maybe they would be better served by finding the shooter before spreading shit on social media, once is bad enough but TWICE. Also remember the white gut you shot at Trump was a Republican. Wtf 😂 Quote
tyldesley_white Posted September 11, 2025 Posted September 11, 2025 32 minutes ago, royal white said: Wtf 😂 did you not post the twitter clip , with the caption that they had they shooter ? so was you right or wrong Quote
royal white Posted September 11, 2025 Posted September 11, 2025 2 minutes ago, tyldesley_white said: did you not post the twitter clip , with the caption that they had they shooter ? so was you right or wrong I posted a Twitter clip. I never said they had the shooter. You then started harping on about skin colour. Quote
tyldesley_white Posted September 11, 2025 Posted September 11, 2025 Just now, royal white said: I posted a Twitter clip. I never said they had the shooter. You then started harping on about skin colour. so you posted misinformation without checking first, I knew that guy had already been released Quote
royal white Posted September 11, 2025 Posted September 11, 2025 5 minutes ago, tyldesley_white said: so you posted misinformation without checking first, I knew that guy had already been released Well done you. I just posted a tweet, you started going off on one about skin colour. Odd Quote
tyldesley_white Posted September 11, 2025 Posted September 11, 2025 Just now, royal white said: Well done you. I just posted a tweet, you started going off on one about skin colour. Odd you posted a lie, did you not , someone who calls people for lying caught posting lies, and at this moment we don't know what the color of his or her skins is because they still have not caught him or her, maybe I should have added 😃 to help you out Quote
royal white Posted September 11, 2025 Posted September 11, 2025 3 minutes ago, tyldesley_white said: you posted a lie, did you not , someone who calls people for lying caught posting lies, and at this moment we don't know what the color of his or her skins is because they still have not caught him or her, maybe I should have added 😃 to help you out No I posted a tweet of a man being arrested. He was arrested was he not? And it’s colour not color. You’re not a yank. (I’d say he’s white going off the images I’ve seen) Quote
tyldesley_white Posted September 11, 2025 Posted September 11, 2025 4 minutes ago, royal white said: No I posted a tweet of a man being arrested. He was arrested was he not? And it’s colour not color. You’re not a yank. (I’d say he’s white going off the images I’ve seen) was he or was he not the shooter, easy for you yes or no, if no you are posting misinformation and therefor a lie, yes or no Quote
royal white Posted September 11, 2025 Posted September 11, 2025 5 minutes ago, tyldesley_white said: was he or was he not the shooter, easy for you yes or no, if no you are posting misinformation and therefor a lie, yes or no I posted a man being detained. Was he or was he not detained. Quote
tyldesley_white Posted September 11, 2025 Posted September 11, 2025 56 minutes ago, royal white said: I posted a man being detained. Was he or was he not detained. Why if you are right have you taken it down Quote
royal white Posted September 11, 2025 Posted September 11, 2025 25 minutes ago, tyldesley_white said: Why if you are right have you taken it down I’ve not taken it down. Stop lying Quote
bolty58 Posted September 12, 2025 Posted September 12, 2025 7 hours ago, tyldesley_white said: But I was right and Royal was wrong, that was not the shooter nor the 2nd one that the FBI said they had, the FBI are 2 nil down at the moment, maybe they would be better served by finding the shooter before spreading shit on social media, once is bad enough but TWICE. Also remember the white gut you shot at Trump was a Republican. I fired nothing at Trump. White gut sounds like it might sting a bit though. Quote
Tonge moor green jacket Posted September 12, 2025 Posted September 12, 2025 Sounds like they've got their man. Quote
miamiwhite Posted September 12, 2025 Posted September 12, 2025 Can't be Dean Holdsworth as he misses the target from 8 yards Quote
miamiwhite Posted September 12, 2025 Posted September 12, 2025 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c04qz5lk6ggo No words needed Quote
gonzo Posted September 12, 2025 Posted September 12, 2025 1 minute ago, miamiwhite said: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c04qz5lk6ggo No words needed Thought we wanted free speech? Quote
Tonge moor green jacket Posted September 12, 2025 Posted September 12, 2025 Just now, miamiwhite said: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c04qz5lk6ggo No words needed Been hearing about this. An academic saying he shouldn't be sacked from his role, as he has the right to say it. Free speech! A sort of twisted legitimacy to that, but it would also bring the society into disrepute. Quote
Tonge moor green jacket Posted September 12, 2025 Posted September 12, 2025 3 minutes ago, gonzo said: Thought we wanted free speech? Indeed. Not very decent though, and naive- what effect might those comments have on his future career prospects? The society boasts that it is the best in the world, and this isn't a good look. It will be interesting to see if he does take up the position or is removed beforehand. Quote
Spider Posted September 12, 2025 Posted September 12, 2025 Let’s just move on. It’s all very sad but, like the man himself was keen to say, the second amendment is a god given right, and sooner or later a nutjob will find you. Quote
miamiwhite Posted September 12, 2025 Posted September 12, 2025 4 minutes ago, Tonge moor green jacket said: Indeed. Not very decent though, and naive- what effect might those comments have on his future career prospects? The society boasts that it is the best in the world, and this isn't a good look. It will be interesting to see if he does take up the position or is removed beforehand. Precisely, hence why they weren't happy with his comments Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.