Jump to content
Wanderers Ways. Neil Thompson 1961-2021

Recommended Posts

Posted
23 minutes ago, Spider said:

I think a vaccine passport is too narrow minded.

We should expand the passport to a general “Riffraffery” option, and a number of criteria added in order to obtain one.

For example -

do you like lobby? No passport.

Do you drink fosters/carling? No passport

Do you say Kekkle instead of kettle? No passport

Are you scouse? No passport 

 

It could be a game changer.

So Wigan and Merseyside then?

Posted
21 minutes ago, Mr Grey said:

You had it early doors didn't you Sweep?

Triple jabbed, covid antibodies, you should be fully souped up protected 😁

I should be bullet proof now 😁

Posted
58 minutes ago, Escobarp said:

How is this different?

Choosing to get noshed off by a ladyboy in Thailand rather than get noshed off by a ladyboy in Rio for your holidays is not comparable to being denied access to day to day services domestically. 

Anyway... Bring em in. They've done a sterling job of completely eradicating the virus in Scotland, France and Italy since they brought the vaccine passports in haven't they. 

Posted
17 minutes ago, stevieb said:

Choosing to get noshed off by a ladyboy in Thailand rather than get noshed off by a ladyboy in Rio for your holidays is not comparable to being denied access to day to day services domestically. 

Anyway... Bring em in. They've done a sterling job of completely eradicating the virus in Scotland, France and Italy since they brought the vaccine passports in haven't they. 

What day to day services are they proposing to restrict here with the vaccine passport? Out of interest ? 
 

and it’s Peru I want to visit and can’t because of yellow fever. Sadly 
 

at first i was against the concept of vaccine passports  when first spoken off months ago but as I’m sat here now 20 months on from the start of this my patience is waining and I’m starting to become more selfish and pissed off that we are all being restricted/more inconvenienced in some ways due to the government protecting an element of the population who have made a choice. 
 

that can’t be right. So the other option is to restrict those causing the issue. IMO. Or let us all crack on but on the Proviso nhs isn’t allowed to be overrun and that means no treatment. Can’t have it both ways. 

Posted
4 hours ago, Tonge moor green jacket said:

Not arsed about his insensitivity or otherwise. 

His ignorance or unwillingness to see the whole picture is surprising.

Utilising data wrongly is dangerous, and he's pointed that out well where undue claims about deaths etc have been made.

Then he does precisely the same himself. When such folly is exposed, its a case of insults and snide.

His lot haven't suffered too badly, therefore it's not a particularly big deal.

Some folk survive cancer, some don't. Etc, etc.

 

There are a lot more people with power & influence who have used data wrongly so I wouldn't trouble yourself too much about Stevie. 

Posted
50 minutes ago, stevieb said:

Choosing to get noshed off by a ladyboy in Thailand rather than get noshed off by a ladyboy in Rio for your holidays is not comparable to being denied access to day to day services domestically. 

Anyway... Bring em in. They've done a sterling job of completely eradicating the virus in Scotland, France and Italy since they brought the vaccine passports in haven't they. 

Do you think vaccines work ? 
 

 

Posted
16 hours ago, Rudy said:

@stevieb there was a moment when I thought you were just sounding like a wum, but over the last few days you’ve just sounded more and more like an absolute cock. People on here have lost people to Covid and you saying oh a lemsip and calpol sorted it. 
 

Stop being a prick Stevie because I know you’re not, it’s not even remotely funny

I laughed out loudly at your 'We're going to need a bigger oven' joke mate but someone on here might have had relatives who died in the holocaust..... Food for thought? 

Posted
1 minute ago, RONNIE PHILLIPS said:

I laughed out loudly at your 'We're going to need a bigger oven' joke mate but someone on here might have had relatives who died in the holocaust..... Food for thought? 

The death of friends or relatives to Covid is probably a bit more raw though. 

Posted
Just now, DazBob said:

The death of friends or relatives to Covid is probably a bit more raw though. 

Depends which end of the joke you are on. Stevieb didn't directly mock anyone's relatives suffering or dying & neither did Rudy. Rudy was pulled up about his insensitivity & rightly in my eyes stook to his guns, on the same basis I don't think Stevie has anything to apologise for. 

Posted
29 minutes ago, Ani said:

Do you think vaccines work ? 
 

 

I think they're reducing the amount of deaths. 

I think they're shite having to have one every 6 months because the efficacy wears off in double quick time.. Probably soon to be every 3 months. 

Sage already saying this is going on for another 5 years! 

3 hours ago, Mr Grey said:

You've both had your jabs, what are you scared of ?

That they don't work 🤔

And I see no one has answered this yet

Posted
19 minutes ago, stevieb said:

I think they're reducing the amount of deaths. 

I think they're shite having to have one every 6 months because the efficacy wears off in double quick time.. Probably soon to be every 3 months. 

Sage already saying this is going on for another 5 years! 

And I see no one has answered this yet

What’s wrong with having a jab every 3 months?

Seriously.

If you’re being treated for cancer you will have chemo fairly often.

It would be nice if one jab did the trick but if it needs a regular top up, what exactly is the hardship?

This is a quickly changing situation and we need to change with it.

Tactics, man, tactics.

Posted
3 hours ago, stevieb said:

And in all seriousness I've mentioned many times why I don't want it and it's never enough for the happy clapper jab shaggers...who screech "just get the damn jab" 

I'm on other medication that will put me at increased risk of blood clots. 

So I did a risk assessment 

https://qcovid.org/Home/Licence?licencedUrl=%2FCalculation&licencedAction=Index&licencedController=Calculation

And decided I'll take my chances with the virus should I get it. 

I got it and was fine. 

I've not took a vaccine that might have had adverse reactions that would have been worse than what I had with covid. 

 

I'm not telling any other cunt not to get the jab as everyones circumstances are different. 

 

But I'm a tinfoil antivax cunt that should be a social leper 

Your own reasons may be perfectly valid. However going on as if its minor purely becasue it didn't overly affect you, together with a string of other protestations, suggest you're not taking a purely scientific or reasonable approach to the whole thing.

Shares in aluminium companies?

 

Posted
9 minutes ago, Spider said:

What’s wrong with having a jab every 3 months?

Seriously.

If you’re being treated for cancer you will have chemo fairly often.

It would be nice if one jab did the trick but if it needs a regular top up, what exactly is the hardship?

This is a quickly changing situation and we need to change with it.

Tactics, man, tactics.

Absolutely. 

More non scientific reasoning on his part. Just bollocks.

However, as you say, if folk needed an injection every 6 months, then it's no hardship at all.

From what I understand, it isn't believed that such frequency would be needed any way.

We have flu jabs every year, and that doesn't cause such calamity amongst the population. 

Posted

“Take an hour out of your life a couple times a year to keep society operating normally, whilst we give you some medicine”

O woah is fucking me.

Posted
29 minutes ago, Spider said:

What’s wrong with having a jab every 3 months?

Seriously.

If you’re being treated for cancer you will have chemo fairly often.

It would be nice if one jab did the trick but if it needs a regular top up, what exactly is the hardship?

This is a quickly changing situation and we need to change with it.

Tactics, man, tactics.

I'm not being treated for cancer. These comparisons are getting more absurd by the day. 

I'd rather not have a jab 4 times a year for something that, for a man with youth and athletic prowess on his side like myself, is little more than a cold. It's not proportionate. 

Again... Everyone else's situations will differ. 

Posted
13 minutes ago, stevieb said:

I'm not being treated for cancer. These comparisons are getting more absurd by the day. 

I'd rather not have a jab 4 times a year for something that, for a man with youth and athletic prowess on his side like myself, is little more than a cold. It's not proportionate. 

Again... Everyone else's situations will differ. 

But youre having the jab 4 times a year to protect people that its more than just a cold for.

Its about everyone, not just you.

Posted
9 minutes ago, gonzo said:

But youre having the jab 4 times a year to protect people that its more than just a cold for.

Its about everyone, not just you.

He knows this.

He’s just being obtuse.

Im dead against lockdowns and restrictions, but there’s no doubt Covid is more dangerous than your average virus - in fact it’s as dangerous as flu. That kills folk but we restrict it to as few as possible with vaccines.

I think we should have a referendum on mandatory vaccines. 

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.