Jump to content
Wanderers Ways. Neil Thompson 1961-2021

Maxwell


Dimron

Recommended Posts

Just now, Dimron said:

I'm agreeing they are guilty of a degree of abuse

 

Just now, MickyD said:

I don’t know but you’ve misunderstood if it’s led to that question.

Good. 

I wasn't sure where we were at... 

Shit parenting. 14 year olds being coerced. The fact that he was a billionaire and they got to go on a jet. 

It's no different to the Rochdale groomers chucking them a line and a blue wkd. 

Just different scales of noncery

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, stevieb said:

 

Good. 

I wasn't sure where we were at... 

Shit parenting. 14 year olds being coerced. The fact that he was a billionaire and they got to go on a jet. 

It's no different to the Rochdale groomers chucking them a line and a blue wkd. 

Just different scales of noncery

I've disagreed (relatively silently) with much that Stevie has posted recently, but he's bang on here.

Private jets and champagne etc is just a more expensive version of free taxis and kebabs.

Grooming is grooming irrespective of the amount spent doing it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators
1 hour ago, Tonge moor green jacket said:

As I said, what were mum and dad doing?

"Dad, I'm going out for a couple of days with a millionaire on his jet"

"Aye, OK love, have a good time"

Different world.

Have a look into her background 

Abused as a child by a family member, foster homes, estranged parents 

The vulnerable type 

Saville's type

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators
Just now, stevieb said:

🙃

Am I in some alternative universe here?

We're talking semantics about having sexual encounters with under 16s. 

WTF! 

I thought you dealt in facts

Forgive me

Deleted it as i couldnt actually be arsed, but there you go

Goodnight

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Traf said:

I've disagreed (relatively silently) with much that Stevie has posted recently, but he's bang on here.

Private jets and champagne etc is just a more expensive version of free taxis and kebabs.

Grooming is grooming irrespective of the amount spent doing it.

Cheers C

I understand we'll all have different opinions on 'the virus' 

But noncing... Surely we're not fucking giving the groomers a free pass because the victims got 'paid' 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

On the fence on this one. Usually, anything to do with noncery - hang the bastards. In this case though I have strong reservations about the motives of the complainants and especially their lawyers. Money chasing appears to be a strong motivator and with the absence of the real perpetrator, is she just a convenient substitute?

On the fence - happy to leave it to a jury of her peers. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
4 hours ago, bolty58 said:

On the fence on this one. Usually, anything to do with noncery - hang the bastards. In this case though I have strong reservations about the motives of the complainants and especially their lawyers. Money chasing appears to be a strong motivator and with the absence of the real perpetrator, is she just a convenient substitute?

On the fence - happy to leave it to a jury of her peers. 

Out of interest did you see the Epstein documentary on Netflix?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The higher profile or higher wealth the abusers are, the less likely the chances of it being reported.

In Rochdale, Rotherham etc, the groomers are quite rightly vilified (for their actions, their ethnicity is irrelevant), but when it comes to wealthy abusers, the tables are turned and those being abused are accused of doing it for the money.

Society is fucked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
6 minutes ago, Traf said:

The higher profile or higher wealth the abusers are, the less likely the chances of it being reported.

In Rochdale, Rotherham etc, the groomers are quite rightly vilified (for their actions, their ethnicity is irrelevant), but when it comes to wealthy abusers, the tables are turned and those being abused are accused of doing it for the money.

Society is fucked.

And why shouldn't they have some compo for what they have been through. Every fucker else does? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Site Supporter
10 hours ago, Zico said:

Have a look into her background 

Abused as a child by a family member, foster homes, estranged parents 

The vulnerable type 

Saville's type

Like I said not following it, just going off dimrons comments.

I was under the impression there were several victims.

Are they all from similar backgrounds, and prime for grooming?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators
23 minutes ago, Tonge moor green jacket said:

Like I said not following it, just going off dimrons comments.

I was under the impression there were several victims.

Are they all from similar backgrounds, and prime for grooming?

 

Couldn't say 

They were targeted though, he had girls recruiting other girls from schools 

He also had a lodge at a top class boarding school he used to lure girls who attended 

This case is no more a case of parents turning a blind eye or being ignorant to what was happening than saville, bennell, Rotherham etc

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Site Supporter
6 hours ago, bolty58 said:

On the fence on this one. Usually, anything to do with noncery - hang the bastards. In this case though I have strong reservations about the motives of the complainants and especially their lawyers. Money chasing appears to be a strong motivator and with the absence of the real perpetrator, is she just a convenient substitute?

14 hours ago, Dimron said:

Going to chuck one in...

How abused were these lasses?

We all know teenage girls are hormonal sex bombs. 

They were not incarcerated by an Albanian trafficking gang.

They were "befriended" by a Billionaire and his girlfriend.

They were flown around in private jets, stayed in luxurious pads including Mar a Largo and partied in top nightspots where you and I would never be admitted.

Rubbed shoulders (and possibly more later) with future  presidents and royal princes.

And they now claim not to know what the admission price was? 

And people wonder how Savile got away it with it for so many years... It was because of paedophile-apologists like this.

Edited by Cheese
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Site Supporter
19 minutes ago, Zico said:

Couldn't say 

They were targeted though, he had girls recruiting other girls from schools 

He also had a lodge at a top class boarding school he used to lure girls who attended 

This case is no more a case of parents turning a blind eye or being ignorant to what was happening than saville, bennell, Rotherham etc

Thanks for the information. 

Answers my initial question. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.