Jump to content
Wanderers Ways. Neil Thompson 1961-2021

Recommended Posts

Posted

 

2 minutes ago, gonzo said:

Only one winner in that chop off.

Can’t be too sure. Sometimes feels like Santos hasnt actually got a set of bollocks!

Sadly, I know Evatt does 🙃.

Posted
5 hours ago, gonzo said:

Yep.

McAtee always wants to try something instead of sideways passing. Looks for the early ball and loves running at folk.

Unfortunately our mixed up playing style and chopping the attack means he's rarely going to take a game by the scruff of the neck.

I'd love to see him start and get a proper run in a two up top. 

That's the problem though ... I don't think he'll get a run of games in his preferred position for us to see how good he could be. Same thing that's happening with Collins now. Squad rotation players playing in different positions each week. 

 

Posted
5 hours ago, tomski said:

Same. I like both of em. Wasn’t sure on Schon first couple but I think he’s an asset when we are dictating tempo.

Mcatee. My type of player all day long.

Imo, Williams is better than Schon

Posted
32 minutes ago, wanderer1984 said:

Imo, Williams is better than Schon

Nothing Williams has done at LWB convinces me he’s better than Schon.

However, one game at RWB convinces me he’s better than Cogley.

Posted
12 minutes ago, Rival Son said:

Nothing Williams has done at LWB convinces me he’s better than Schon.

However, one game at RWB convinces me he’s better than Cogley.

Think they're all capable of doing a job.

Issue is bigger than the capabilities of individual players for me.

Posted (edited)

Skim reading this highlights a reason why we are where we are.

We are too reliant on individual skill/talent/level of performance in certain positions the way we play, Evatt never gets more than the some of the parts, generally less in my opinion.

Which lets be honest, is what sorts the good managers from the bad.

Edited by JimmyRiddle
  • Site Supporter
Posted

Birmingham spent nearly (if not above £20m), they're better than any team i've seen in 3rd Division (this season or last). They'll be promoted for Xmas. They've been beat once, by Charlton (as were we) at the Valley.

Everyone in this league is playing for 2nd spot or play-offs.

We have enough in squad. Injuries apart..

Posted (edited)
1 minute ago, Ratwhite said:

Birmingham spent nearly (if not above £20m), they're better than any team i've seen in 3rd Division (this season or last). They'll be promoted for Xmas. They've been beat once, by Charlton (as were we) at the Valley.

Everyone in this league is playing for 2nd spot or play-offs.

We have enough in squad. Injuries apart..

That's a bit like what Iles said on his after game podcast thing, if we accept Birmingham are an outlier then that means everyone is playing for 1 auto promotion space and our chances of getting that must be rated pretty low. We're currently miles and miles off.

Edited by Marc505
  • Site Supporter
Posted
1 minute ago, Ratwhite said:

Birmingham spent nearly (if not above £20m), they're better than any team i've seen in 3rd Division (this season or last). They'll be promoted for Xmas. They've been beat once, by Charlton (as were we) at the Valley.

Everyone in this league is playing for 2nd spot or play-offs.

We have enough in squad. Injuries apart..

I don’t think folks doubt that we have enough in the squad, it’s about the way that they are being used by the manager.

Posted

Not sure who I've got for favourites for 2nd.

I'm not buying this our league is weaker this season either. 

Pompey we're better than Brum for me.

Posted
3 hours ago, Zico said:

Just post whatever you want and stick "allegedly" in there

By all means do but be aware that the word doesn't have the magical properties many people believe.

It doesn't nullify clear intent & you can still be sued for libel, defamation, malicious besmirchment and a host of other stuff.

But, hey. Don't let me stop you. 

  • Site Supporter
Posted
16 minutes ago, Dr. Feelgood said:

By all means do but be aware that the word doesn't have the magical properties many people believe.

It doesn't nullify clear intent & you can still be sued for libel, defamation, malicious besmirchment and a host of other stuff.

But, hey. Don't let me stop you. 

We are all, no doubt, intrigued to know the information. 

Apart from the above, would revealing it be of benefit to the club and team?

Unless an unequivocal yes, then maybe leave it. Certainly for the time being.

  • Site Supporter
Posted
1 hour ago, Marc505 said:

That's a bit like what Iles said on his after game podcast thing, if we accept Birmingham are an outlier then that means everyone is playing for 1 auto promotion space and our chances of getting that must be rated pretty low. We're currently miles and miles off.

Maybe pal, but its a long season (as we know) in this league, look at Sunlon

  • Site Supporter
Posted
1 hour ago, gonzo said:

Not sure who I've got for favourites for 2nd.

I'm not buying this our league is weaker this season either. 

Pompey we're better than Brum for me.

No way mate. Theyre yards ahead

  • Moderators
Posted
1 hour ago, gonzo said:

Not sure who I've got for favourites for 2nd.

I'm not buying this our league is weaker this season either. 

Pompey we're better than Brum for me.

Before last night the bookies had Wrexham then us for promotion/top 2

Posted
2 hours ago, Ratwhite said:

Birmingham spent nearly (if not above £20m), they're better than any team i've seen in 3rd Division (this season or last). They'll be promoted for Xmas. They've been beat once, by Charlton (as were we) at the Valley.

Everyone in this league is playing for 2nd spot or play-offs.

We have enough in squad. Injuries apart..

We don’t trott this out though when we lose at home to Exeter. We have spent a decent amount at this level. Can’t have it both ways.

Birmingham are better and as @Greg_BWFCsays losing is fine. They didn’t get out of 2nd gear last night and we’d lost within 3 minutes, which is the tough bit to swallow

Posted

Let's have it right, we've spent £2m more or less on two 'strikers' who look a bit flimsy and can't even establish themselves in the team.

  • Site Supporter
Posted
1 hour ago, Traf said:

Let's have it right, we've spent £2m more or less on two 'strikers' who look a bit flimsy and can't even establish themselves in the team.

They've all been swapped around. 

Saying they can't establish themselves isn't their fault.

Also been used in different formations and positions.

It seems clear what Evatt's ideas are with his forwards.

 

Posted
2 hours ago, tomski said:

Birmingham are better and as @Greg_BWFCsays losing is fine. They didn’t get out of 2nd gear last night and we’d lost within 3 minutes, which is the tough bit to swallow

It's not about losing 2-0 away to the league leaders, it's about turning up defeated. About yet more reshuffles, about putting Charles up front alone. About leaving 2 recent £1m forwards on the bench, about players out of position. About confusion, lack of cohesion. ... & lots more.

A one-off 2-0 defea, away,t against the leagues best team is neither here nor there.

 

Posted
5 minutes ago, Dr. Feelgood said:

It's not about losing 2-0 away to the league leaders, it's about turning up defeated. About yet more reshuffles, about putting Charles up front alone. About leaving 2 recent £1m forwards on the bench, about players out of position. About confusion, lack of cohesion. ... & lots more.

A one-off 2-0 defea, away,t against the leagues best team is neither here nor there.

 

You forgot starting Arfield.

Posted
5 hours ago, gonzo said:

Not sure who I've got for favourites for 2nd.

I'm not buying this our league is weaker this season either. 

Pompey we're better than Brum for me.

It's weaker in that there aren't three sides like Plymouth, Ipswich, Sheff Wed but more competitive in that there 8/9/10 sides behind Brum who are similar level and will take points off each other all season. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.