Jump to content
Wanderers Ways. Neil Thompson 1961-2021

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, FrancisFogarty said:

Overhaul the Wi-Fi while you’ve got your toolbox out and all.

They're doing that with the bond money, aren't they?

Wait, hang on, what's that? They're doing after the fourth mini-screen goes in.

  • Site Supporter
Posted
2 hours ago, Cheese said:

Followed some advice on here and switched to Lebara a few weeks ago. Previously had no signal whatsoever in and around the ground, but had no issues since.

Sometimes it sems like I'm the only one with a blank screen. I feel like a right pauper.

  • Site Supporter
Posted
6 minutes ago, FrancisFogarty said:

Sometimes it sems like I'm the only one with a blank screen. I feel like a right pauper.

Switch to Lebara.

Posted
1 hour ago, Traf said:

They're doing that with the bond money, aren't they?

Wait, hang on, what's that? They're doing after the fourth mini-screen goes in.

Players trained this week on the new, upgraded training pitch for the first time. Paid for with bond money. Surprised club haven’t shouted about it. 

  • Site Supporter
Posted
24 minutes ago, thebells said:

Players trained this week on the new, upgraded training pitch for the first time. Paid for with bond money. Surprised club haven’t shouted about it. 

They might have, but there's no WiFi so word's not got out. We're waiting on a letter.

  • Members
Posted
30 minutes ago, thebells said:

Players trained this week on the new, upgraded training pitch for the first time. Paid for with bond money. Surprised club haven’t shouted about it. 

Hopefully this means we won't pick up quite as many training ground injuries

Posted
4 hours ago, tomski said:

Where he stands in the ground? 

Looking for a debate that’s not there champ.

I think it makes no difference where he stands during play.

Can still do pre match, half time and subs etc

Standing on the touchline gobbing off is so "trade"

If he wants to be a proper manager he needs to learn to stand back. Unless he ultimately wants to bugger off to Italy or Argentina.

Mind you, you could probably hear him from the gantry...

Posted

Changing a successful formation to yesterdays struggle, just shows his stubbornness will always override his thinking to what he knows is best, rather then what actually is best

  • Moderators
Posted

Lebara use vf network

Why would lebara have better reception than vf

Its a genuine question, not doubting youre getting a good signal, but its clearly more than just the network

 

Posted
7 minutes ago, Lt. Aldo Raine said:

I thought that

And also, why does it seem so cheap relative to the rest of the market?

Cos they use Mike from Macclesfield on the adverts😂

  • Site Supporter
Posted
On 20/10/2024 at 22:06, Lt. Aldo Raine said:

I thought that

And also, why does it seem so cheap relative to the rest of the market?

I thought that. I don’t want to swap a six for two threes.

Is it a faff ?

Posted
4 minutes ago, wanderer1984 said:

Watching Birmingham reminded me how we used to play under Evatt. Quick passing, players making space, winning the ball back quickly, tiring the opposition out.

We had a system that worked. Everyone knew their roles. If a player was injured we'd have a back up player to fill that place.

The identity Evatt built up has gone and I think that's what pisses me off most about this team.

Anyone know what formation we played tonight? Looked like a 523 again.

Recruitment has been shocking too. Schon 1m? Weak as piss ... McAtee 1m? Anyone know what his main position is? Arfield? utterly pointless.

Papering over the cracks with our mini winning run. Tonight was a reality check of how backwards we've gone.

 

I  agree with the point about identity. After years of us just being "a team" with nothing to really define what or who we were, we've had a few seasons of us standing for something, a way of playing. Currently though we look like we're not sure what we're meant to be.

  • Site Supporter
Posted
16 minutes ago, wanderer1984 said:

Watching Birmingham reminded me how we used to play under Evatt. Quick passing, players making space, winning the ball back quickly, tiring the opposition out.

We had a system that worked. Everyone knew their roles. If a player was injured we'd have a back up player to fill that place.

The identity Evatt built up has gone and I think that's what pisses me off most about this team.

Anyone know what formation we played tonight? Looked like a 523 again.

Recruitment has been shocking too. Schon 1m? Weak as piss ... McAtee 1m? Anyone know what his main position is? Arfield? utterly pointless.

Papering over the cracks with our mini winning run. Tonight was a reality check of how backwards we've gone.

 

I was hoping it wouldn't be, but seems it was.

Don't get it; if you want to frustrate a team by packing midfielders in, then play them as midfielders.

I didn't mind the selection per se, but again, a hybrid- type, bet-hedging set up didn't work. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Tonge moor green jacket said:

I was hoping it wouldn't be, but seems it was.

Don't get it; if you want to frustrate a team by packing midfielders in, then play them as midfielders.

I didn't mind the selection per se, but again, a hybrid- type, bet-hedging set up didn't work. 

Over thinking and over complicating things.

Has to be the smartest person  in the room. 

Know the games are coming thick and fast but decide on your best team and formation then play it.

Tonight shouldn't be used to define our season but, I dunno, was a strange approach imo.

  • Members
Posted
4 minutes ago, Tonge moor green jacket said:

I was hoping it wouldn't be, but seems it was.

Don't get it; if you want to frustrate a team by packing midfielders in, then play them as midfielders.

I didn't mind the selection per se, but again, a hybrid- type, bet-hedging set up didn't work. 

It wasn't 5-2-3 and we did do what you suggest in your second paragraph

It just didn't really work

Perhaps it might've done with Tomo in instead of Arfield

Posted (edited)
43 minutes ago, wanderer1984 said:

Watching Birmingham reminded me how we used to play under Evatt. Quick passing, players making space, winning the ball back quickly, tiring the opposition out.

We had a system that worked. Everyone knew their roles. If a player was injured we'd have a back up player to fill that place.

The identity Evatt built up has gone and I think that's what pisses me off most about this team.

Anyone know what formation we played tonight? Looked like a 523 again.

Recruitment has been shocking too. Schon 1m? Weak as piss ... McAtee 1m? Anyone know what his main position is? Arfield? utterly pointless.

Papering over the cracks with our mini winning run. Tonight was a reality check of how backwards we've gone.

 

This is the illusion of IE's system, since he's been manager we've never been competitive with the teams around and above us. Sure we got loads of points from teams lower down the league but even then there were lapses in concentration which turned 1-0 wins into 1-1 draws. These lapses in concentration are fundemental to the structure he's got them playing because in essence they're not good enough to play this structure, if they were, they'd be playing in the Premier League.

The problem isn't the players, even Birmingham wouldn't be able to suceed with the way he's asking them to play.

Edited by Zog1
  • Site Supporter
Posted
1 hour ago, Zog1 said:

This is the illusion of IE's system, since he's been manager we've never been competitive with the teams around and above us. Sure we got loads of points from teams lower down the league but even then there were lapses in concentration which turned 1-0 wins into 1-1 draws. These lapses in concentration are fundemental to the structure he's got them playing because in essence they're not good enough to play this structure, if they were, they'd be playing in the Premier League.

The problem isn't the players, even Birmingham wouldn't be able to suceed with the way he's asking them to play.

Even the commentator stated that they want to just go sideways, with a daft amount of pressure on the wing backs. 

Schon has little glimmers but he's not there yet, 

I do worry that we've seen the best of Charles, and unfortuantly despite spending on Collins and Mcatee, he won't give them the run together they need. Mcatee looked so much more of a threat when he came on. 

Posted
8 hours ago, Zog1 said:

This is the illusion of IE's system, since he's been manager we've never been competitive with the teams around and above us. Sure we got loads of points from teams lower down the league but even then there were lapses in concentration which turned 1-0 wins into 1-1 draws. These lapses in concentration are fundemental to the structure he's got them playing because in essence they're not good enough to play this structure, if they were, they'd be playing in the Premier League.

The problem isn't the players, even Birmingham wouldn't be able to suceed with the way he's asking them to play.

Agree on this. Struggling to think of a time outside of the pizza cup final (which was an actual free hit) when we’ve outwitted or outfoxed a better team under him.

It just doesn’t happen.

  • Site Supporter
Posted
9 hours ago, Lt. Aldo Raine said:

It wasn't 5-2-3 and we did do what you suggest in your second paragraph

It just didn't really work

Perhaps it might've done with Tomo in instead of Arfield

Then don't pick Arfield, and frankly don't select Sheehan.

We were never having loads of possession and as per every time we play such a game where we can't bully a team, Sheehan goes missing.

He must see that it's the same each time.

Why not try something different; maybe 4 at the back, 5 in midfield for example. 

Johnson and Santos as central defenders last night.

Williams and cogley full backs.

Schon wide left, Matete and Dempsey with Lolos as the 3.

May have needed to utilise McAtee wide right as needs must.

No guarantees clearly, but at least offers the chance to double up and help prevent crosses, which we sometimes struggle with.

Whichever way he used them, it simply doesn't seem to suit any of them. Over elaborate and failing.

Posted
10 hours ago, wanderer1984 said:

Watching Birmingham reminded me how we used to play under Evatt. Quick passing, players making space, winning the ball back quickly, tiring the opposition out.

We had a system that worked. Everyone knew their roles. If a player was injured we'd have a back up player to fill that place.

The identity Evatt built up has gone and I think that's what pisses me off most about this team.

Anyone know what formation we played tonight? Looked like a 523 again.

Recruitment has been shocking too. Schon 1m? Weak as piss ... McAtee 1m? Anyone know what his main position is? Arfield? utterly pointless.

Papering over the cracks with our mini winning run. Tonight was a reality check of how backwards we've gone.

 

I don't agree with the criticism of Schon and McAtee, I think they've shown enough that they can be good players for us, if we sort ourselves out.

The rest of your post is spot on though. We've lost our way completely and I'm not even sure Evatt even knows what he's trying to do anymore.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.