Jump to content
Wanderers Ways. Neil Thompson 1961-2021

Harvey Wankstain


bolty58

Recommended Posts

  • Site Supporter

Me and you both!  Minus the death(s), obvs.  

 

I see that about the hostesses but they are being asked to dress in a provocative manner - hardly a massive leap to see what will happen.

 

Not condoning any groping but I'd bet a fair few took some 'tips' and offered a special arrangement . . .

 

As long as no-ones forced to do anything they don't want, leave em to it.

 

All just a big power trip for sad middle aged men, really.

I agree generally, though the investigator was claiming not all the women knew what was going to happen.

She did say in her interview if women wanted to be a hostess knowing what would happen then that's their choice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

She didn’t have to concentrate more on her family than her career, she chose that path

 

Her partner is in the same industry and at a similar level, shared paternity was on the table but she wanted to have the time with the child. She can work 5 days a week and her husband can do 3 but she wants it the other way

 

My company pay the same for paternity leave as they do maternity yet my wife only let me have 6 weeks as she wanted the rest of it. She is also pushing to go to 4 days a week after baby 2

 

It’s likely that her career won’t go as far due to the fact she will only work for 80% of the time that some of her colleagues will, she will certainly earn 20% less at the beginning

 

These are all choices, they arent forced on women

Ok read that again.

 

Then place it in the context of human history.

 

Yes it might be her individual choice and that is fine, but the choice between childcare and career is just not something most men (including myself) ever factor into their life plan. For women NOT to seems strange.

 

Freedom of choice is also about the context in which that choice is exercised. Vastly more women do the vast majority of childcare (its their nature innit - vaginas n that - which incidentally means sheath if you're talking about who has power over language and control) men need to do more and saying 'it's their choice' isn't good enough - there needs to be a more concentrated effort to divide this time - to make sure women do feel like there are only two choices available to them. That's the sort of choices that people are fighting for.

 

But as I say - people round here have got a handle on what it's like to be a women in 2018. What I see is the world is still tipped in favour of me - of men, and more specifically white, middle aged, white men. I'm not sure we'll agree on this, and it seems like its getting a bit circular - what I can say with confidence is that things are thankfully changing - not far and as fast as I'd personally like - but as I said earlier this debate seems more open, and permeating deeper areas of society than it has in my lifetime certainly. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok read that again.

 

Then place it in the context of human history.

 

Yes it might be her individual choice and that is fine, but the choice between childcare and career is just not something most men (including myself) ever factor into their life plan. For women NOT to seems strange.

 

Freedom of choice is also about the context in which that choice is exercised. Vastly more women do the vast majority of childcare (its their nature innit - vaginas n that - which incidentally means sheath if you're talking about who has power over language and control) men need to do more and saying 'it's their choice' isn't good enough - there needs to be a more concentrated effort to divide this time - to make sure women do feel like there are only two choices available to them. That's the sort of choices that people are fighting for.

 

But as I say - people round here have got a handle on what it's like to be a women in 2018. What I see is the world is still tipped in favour of me - of men, and more specifically white, middle aged, white men. I'm not sure we'll agree on this, and it seems like its getting a bit circular - what I can say with confidence is that things are thankfully changing - not far and as fast as I'd personally like - but as I said earlier this debate seems more open, and permeating deeper areas of society than it has in my lifetime certainly. 

 

I reckon if you made the world as you want it and all things re. careers, childcare etc were 'equal' you'd still find more women want to look after their young than males; and you'd find a society not far off ours.

 

In Norway (iirc) they push gender  neutrality more than any other nation in youth.  Studies show that as adults the very same folk are more likely to chose traditional gender roles than in a nation as backwards as ours.  Go figure?!  (I'd link to it if I could)

 

If you had to put your little one in the hands of a carer (hypothetically) and you had a blind choice between male or female which would you instinctively choose?

 

Be honest now - no intellectual pondering - gut, basic instinct.

Edited by madthatter
Link to comment
Share on other sites

These 'upmarket' sex clubs, knocking shops etc. the only difference between them and low rent shitholes is the spunk and sweat soaked stuff you're rawling about on costs more...

 

I've also heard they 'stack' the deck with brasses.

 

Finally, I presume it's johnnybags (or doses) all round. Nah, I can live without it as a life experience.

 

I bet they're more like the scene in Sexy Beast than Eyes Wide Shut.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I reckon if you made the word as you want it and all things re. careers, childcare etc were 'equal' you'd still find more women want to look after their young than males; and you'd find a society not far off ours.

 

In Norway (iirc) they push gender neutrality more than any other nation in youth. Studies show that as adults the very same folk are more likely to chose traditional gender roles than in a nation as backwards as ours. Go figure?! (I'd link to it if I could)

 

If you had to put your little one in the hands of a carer (hypothetically) and you had a blind choice between male or female which would you instinctively choose?

 

Be honest now - no intellectual pondering - gut, basic instinct.

That’s one of the daftest and asinine questions ever posed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That’s one of the daftest and asinine questions ever posed.

 

It's really not in the context of the discussion and your post.

 

I could ask a woman the same question (and have) and most, being honest, would say a woman.

 

You can argue socialisation, patriarchy and all that but the instinct is still there in a way it isn't in men.  (I'm your ideal man by the way - work part time to help rear children, have taken up a traditionally female vocation and even make the tea - doesn't stop me seeing the obvious, I'm just a bit gay  :)

 

That's why more women than men have made, and will continue to make, the choice Birch outlines.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Site Supporter

It's really not in the context of the discussion and your post.

 

I could ask a woman the same question (and have) and most, being honest, would say a woman.

 

You can argue socialisation, patriarchy and all that but the instinct is still there in a way it isn't in men.  (I'm your ideal man by the way - work part time to help rear children, have taken up a traditionally female vocation and even make the tea - doesn't stop me seeing the obvious, I'm just a bit gay  :)

 

That's why more women than men have made, and will continue to make, the choice Birch outlines.

Quite.

I gave up at his comment "men need to do more..."

I'm happy enough in my skin with my attitudes towards women.

A patronising Crawley isn't going to change that; in fact I wonder how he sleeps at night in that hair shirt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok read that again.

 

Then place it in the context of human history.

 

Yes it might be her individual choice and that is fine, but the choice between childcare and career is just not something most men (including myself) ever factor into their life plan. For women NOT to seems strange.

 

Freedom of choice is also about the context in which that choice is exercised. Vastly more women do the vast majority of childcare (its their nature innit - vaginas n that - which incidentally means sheath if you're talking about who has power over language and control) men need to do more and saying 'it's their choice' isn't good enough - there needs to be a more concentrated effort to divide this time - to make sure women do feel like there are only two choices available to them. That's the sort of choices that people are fighting for.

 

But as I say - people round here have got a handle on what it's like to be a women in 2018. What I see is the world is still tipped in favour of me - of men, and more specifically white, middle aged, white men. I'm not sure we'll agree on this, and it seems like its getting a bit circular - what I can say with confidence is that things are thankfully changing - not far and as fast as I'd personally like - but as I said earlier this debate seems more open, and permeating deeper areas of society than it has in my lifetime certainly.

I think your looking at it too negatively

 

In all honesty if you offered me the choice between earning more in my career or alternatively spending less time at work and more time at home with the family then I would choose to do the latter

 

Unfortunately that’s what my wife wants as well and she goes through pregnancy so she decides. I suppose we could both take 9 months off then go back 4 days a week so it’s fair which would be amazing but we can’t really afford that. If there's any money spare then she would want 3 days and me 5 than us both on 4.

 

You see the fact that the average women earns less than the average man across a lifetime as a bad thing for women. I see it as an indication that they have spent less time in work and more time with their children which I think is a huge positive for women. After all the majority of people only really work because they have to and not because they want to. On the other hand most people have children because they want to not because they have to.

Edited by birch-chorley
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think your looking at it too negatively

 

In all honesty if you offered me the choice between earning more in my career or alternatively spending less time at work and more time at home with the family then I would choose to do the latter

 

Unfortunately that’s what my wife wants as well and she goes through pregnancy so she decides. I suppose we could both take 9 months off then go back 4 days a week so it’s fair which would be amazing but we can’t really afford that. If there's any money spare then she would want 3 days and me 5 than us both on 4.

 

You see the fact that the average women earns less than the average man across a lifetime as a bad thing for women. I see it as an indication that they have spent less time in work and more time with their children which I think is a huge positive for women. After all the majority of people only really work because they have to and not because they want to. On the other hand most people have children because they want to not because they have to.

 

Well put.  The main reason I'm going part-time is due to circumstances and that my Mrs makes more £.

 

She's 'better' at it than me but I love the time I spend with my little lad.   It's also, despite what anyone says, easier and more rewarding than my day job - well, mostly.   She has compromised and does 4 longer days to have one off.  Both working like this is killing us at the minute.

 

I do think the first few months to a year are very important, and ensuring a healthy attachment between baby and mother is so important for emotional and later social development (she took 9 months maternity).  That's something that is purely natural.  Can a Dad do it?  Aye, but not as well, generally.

Edited by madthatter
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators

I think your looking at it too negatively

 

In all honesty if you offered me the choice between earning more in my career or alternatively spending less time at work and more time at home with the family then I would choose to do the latter

 

Unfortunately that’s what my wife wants as well and she goes through pregnancy so she decides. I suppose we could both take 9 months off then go back 4 days a week so it’s fair which would be amazing but we can’t really afford that. If there's any money spare then she would want 3 days and me 5 than us both on 4.

 

You see the fact that the average women earns less than the average man across a lifetime as a bad thing for women. I see it as an indication that they have spent less time in work and more time with their children which I think is a huge positive for women. After all the majority of people only really work because they have to and not because they want to. On the other hand most people have children because they want to not because they have to.

 

 

thats extremely selfish of her

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Quite.

I gave up at his comment "men need to do more..."

I'm happy enough in my skin with my attitudes towards women.

A patronising Crawley isn't going to change that; in fact I wonder how he sleeps at night in that hair shirt.

 

 

Must be torture being stuck in a middle aged, white mans body when you'd much prefer to be a woman.

 

Maybe he is saving up for the op?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Site Supporter

Must be torture being stuck in a middle aged, white mans body when you'd much prefer to be a woman.

 

Maybe he is saving up for the op?

In fairness, its done on the NHS. My Mrs has a relative who went through the change from man to woman.

An example of just how understanding society is; I'll not be thrashing myself with branches as penance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think your looking at it too negatively

 

In all honesty if you offered me the choice between earning more in my career or alternatively spending less time at work and more time at home with the family then I would choose to do the latter

 

Unfortunately that’s what my wife wants as well and she goes through pregnancy so she decides. I suppose we could both take 9 months off then go back 4 days a week so it’s fair which would be amazing but we can’t really afford that. If there's any money spare then she would want 3 days and me 5 than us both on 4.

 

You see the fact that the average women earns less than the average man across a lifetime as a bad thing for women. I see it as an indication that they have spent less time in work and more time with their children which I think is a huge positive for women. After all the majority of people only really work because they have to and not because they want to. On the other hand most people have children because they want to not because they have to.

Bang on.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.