Jump to content
Wanderers Ways. Neil Thompson 1961-2021

Meanwhile in Israel


wanderer1984

Recommended Posts

  • Site Supporter
Just now, Not in Crawley said:

I missed that one. I doubt it'll be on sounds, looks like he's had a bit of a nightmare since his jokes about England players.

It is. See previous post.

Edited by Cheese
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, London Wanderer said:

Who’s forecast did you agree with

 The one I posted which was carried out by experts & think tanks? You did read it right?

Or your own forecast (wherever you got it from) ? 

2023 + 50 = 2073

Add another 23 years to your forecast.

You can add percentage increase for each year if you like.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators
12 hours ago, Not in Crawley said:

But some on here have been stoked by Braverman's agenda. 

Interestingly I was having a read about her and did you know she's married to a Jewish chap with close family members in the IDF 

She's also named after Sue Ellen from Dallas 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators
1 hour ago, Tonge moor green jacket said:

 

Yet more former officers (as high a dci) are openly stating that Rowley is wrong. 

Is dci as high as asst commisioner of the met?

Listen to neil basus discussion with marr tonight

Accuses sunak, vile bitch and others of encouraging the commissioner to break the law

If nothing else, for their own political games theyve hung him out to dry

Absolute complete and utter cunts

Hed be better banning it, watch carnage ensue and smugly say 'i told you so'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Casino said:

Is dci as high as asst commisioner of the met?

Listen to neil basus discussion with marr tonight

Accuses sunak, vile bitch and others of encouraging the commissioner to break the law

If nothing else, for their own political games theyve hung him out to dry

Absolute complete and utter cunts

Hed be better banning it, watch carnage ensue and smugly say 'i told you so'

How? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators
3 minutes ago, royal white said:

How? How was she encouraging him to break the law 

Righto

he can only apply for a ban if he has evidence that there is likely to be serious civil disorder

pissing on a monument does not count

apologies for the formatting below

 

Sir Mark was hauled in for a meeting with Mr Sunak on Wednesday after saying he had concluded the threshold for preventing the Palestine Solidarity Campaign march from going ahead had not been met.

Mr Basu told LBC’s Andrew Marr on Wednesday: “I think what you’re witnessing is the end of operational independence in policing. This is the start of it, I say it that strongly.

“People who have done my job, every chief is used to sitting in the room with politicians in private, having very difficult conversations with policing issues. We do those in private for a reason.

“Luckily [Sir Mark] is one of the most senior police officers in the country, and one that I happen to know has a core of absolute steel. I worry in another situation, it could be a brand-new chief constable at the start of their contract worried about their reputation and their future, who might be tempted to bend.”

He added of Sir Mark: “This is not a man who is going to bow under political pressure to do something that he has made very clear is against the law.

“He’s been very clear that he doesn’t have the intelligence or reasonable suspicion that that protest march is going to turn into what people seem to think it will turn into – and he needs that before he can approach a Home Secretary with an application to ban a march.

“If you’re applying to a Home Secretary who has said she would sign such an order without, it appears, needing to see any of the intelligence or evidence that supports it, that’s not a lawful act.”

Asked if the Government is behaving unconstitutionally, he said: “I think it’s on the verge of that, asking the most senior police officer in the country to do something that isn’t lawful.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Casino said:

Righto

he can only apply for a ban if he has evidence that there is likely to be serious civil disorder

pissing on a monument does not count

apologies for the formatting below

 

Sir Mark was hauled in for a meeting with Mr Sunak on Wednesday after saying he had concluded the threshold for preventing the Palestine Solidarity Campaign march from going ahead had not been met.

Mr Basu told LBC’s Andrew Marr on Wednesday: “I think what you’re witnessing is the end of operational independence in policing. This is the start of it, I say it that strongly.

“People who have done my job, every chief is used to sitting in the room with politicians in private, having very difficult conversations with policing issues. We do those in private for a reason.

“Every chief knows that they will be held to account for their decisions… you don’t need to play out that conversation in public, with a rather disingenuous ‘it’s your decision but my view is this should happen’.

“Luckily [Sir Mark] is one of the most senior police officers in the country, and one that I happen to know has a core of absolute steel. I worry in another situation, it could be a brand-new chief constable at the start of their contract worried about their reputation and their future, who might be tempted to bend.”

He added of Sir Mark: “This is not a man who is going to bow under political pressure to do something that he has made very clear is against the law.

“He’s been very clear that he doesn’t have the intelligence or reasonable suspicion that that protest march is going to turn into what people seem to think it will turn into – and he needs that before he can approach a Home Secretary with an application to ban a march.

“If you’re applying to a Home Secretary who has said she would sign such an order without, it appears, needing to see any of the intelligence or evidence that supports it, that’s not a lawful act.”

Asked if the Government is behaving unconstitutionally, he said: “I think it’s on the verge of that, asking the most senior police officer in the country to do something that isn’t lawful.”

Ok so how was she encouraging him to break the law and what law are you referring to. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators
4 minutes ago, royal white said:

Ok so how was she encouraging him to break the law and what law are you referring to. 

 

Everything is there or a click away

If you cant manage that, im not wasting my time

Maybe I gave you too much credit

See if LW will play

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Casino said:

 

Everything is there or a click away

If you cant manage that, im not wasting my time

Maybe I gave you too much credit

See if LW will play

So you have no ideas what law. We are about 6 pages in on this and I still don’t think you have realised the police can’t call a ban on a March without the Home Secretary’s say so and the HS can’t call for a ban without intel/advice from the  police. They work together.
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Casino said:

 

Everything is there or a click away

If you cant manage that, im not wasting my time

Maybe I gave you too much credit

See if LW will play

I’ll play. Anil Kanti Basu believes that British police are institutionally racist. He’s not very well liked by people in the police force. Just for clarity. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators
1 minute ago, royal white said:

So you have no ideas what law. We are about 6 pages in on this and I still don’t think you have realised the police can’t call a ban on a March without the Home Secretary’s say so and the HS can’t call for a ban without intel/advice from the  police. They work together.
 

 

And thats the fucking point, so you have got it

Theyre pushing him to apply for a ban when he doesnt have grounds/ evidence to

Bit naughty that, Id say

You disagree, or more likely youre very very bored

Im going watching the test card as its a fair bit less tedious than you, my friend

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators
Just now, BobyBrno said:

I’ll play. Anil Kanti Basu believes that British police are institutionally racist. He’s not very well liked by people in the police force. Just for clarity. 

Im not arsed whether hes liked

He played the DCI card, thats all

And how about we stick to whats being said, not who is saying it

Copyright RW

:)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Casino said:

And thats the fucking point, so you have got it

Theyre pushing him to apply for a ban when he doesnt have grounds/ evidence to

Bit naughty that, Id say

You disagree, or more likely youre very very bored

Im going watching the test card as its a fair bit less tedious than you, my friend

So where has she asked for it to be banned on limited intel? 
 

I’ve seen this 

And I’ve seen this 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Casino said:

Im not arsed whether hes liked

He played the DCI card, thats all

And how about we stick to whats being said, not who is saying it

Copyright RW

:)

 

Because he is typical of the hierarchy of the police today. It’s a fundamental problem of policing in this country. Not just the Met. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, wanderer1984 said:

2023 + 50 = 2073

Add another 23 years to your forecast.

You can add percentage increase for each year if you like.

How the fuck did you work that out? 
 

I’m loving your attempt at Maths these last two days 😂 You could learn a thing or two from our Arabic friends. 
 

A percent a year😂

 go back and read what the experts said lad. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, London Wanderer said:

How the fuck did you work that out? 
 

I’m loving your attempt at Maths these last two days 😂 You could learn a thing or two from our Arabic friends. 
 

A percent a year😂

 go back and read what the experts said lad. 

Its quite simple. I said 50 years time.

The figures from your experts gave a forecast in 2050.

2050 isn't in 50 years time.

So add another 23 years.

My maths? You teach and you can't work that out? 😂

Each year the percentage difference gets bigger. I thought you'd know this.

 

Edited by wanderer1984
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, wanderer1984 said:

Its quite simple. I said 50 years time.

The figures from your experts gave a forecast in 2050.

2050 isn't in 50 years time.

So add another 23 years.

My maths? You teach and you can't work that out? 😂

Each year the percentage difference gets bigger. I thought you'd know this.

 

it’s equally clear that the gap in fertility between Muslim and non-Muslim will continue to lessen over time, as it has in recent decades. FactCheck wouldn’t bet on the British Muslim population ever topping 10 per cent, let alone 50 per cent.

You forgot to read the facts mate. Here they are again. The key word there being ‘ever’. 
 

“each year the percentage trend gets bigger”

😂😂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, London Wanderer said:

it’s equally clear that the gap in fertility between Muslim and non-Muslim will continue to lessen over time, as it has in recent decades. FactCheck wouldn’t bet on the British Muslim population ever topping 10 per cent, let alone 50 per cent.

You forgot to read the facts mate. Here they are again. The key word there being ‘ever’. 
 

“each year the percentage trend gets bigger”

😂😂

We’re at 7% now… there is no doubt it will top 10% in the medium term. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.