Jump to content
Wanderers Ways. Neil Thompson 1961-2021

Recommended Posts

Posted
6 hours ago, Bertie said:

otherwise they ironically make the situation they don’t like worse.

Never liked the red shite since his playing days however had given him credit more recently for being a really good pundit.

Like most fucking overpaid celebrities (Lineker, Clooney etc.), just another champagne socialist totally detached from the real world. Won't be worried if he is sacked. Won't be if he stays around. If it's the latter, hopefully he's learned something.

There is much truth however in your last few words. Some of us latched on to this way back in 2016.

I was about to give you the "Sssshhh!" but nothing to worry about. Like Hamas, their hatred will overcome their ability to pull their heads in.

Posted
1 hour ago, Not in Crawley said:

Then you're being too selective, which is why this 'its all just free speech' take is a bit baloney.

I'm not being selective, I'm taking it as it comes

I've not been on twitter, I've not seen a reaction for him to be sacked

there wasn't a mention of him being sacked in the video, LW didn't mention it, neither did spider, or you, so I'm just going off the videos regards my view of it all

Posted
5 hours ago, boltonboris said:

Well if it's true about the kings eldest son's penchant for pegging and the rapey nature of the royal men, one of us being up "against the wall" might be very true indeed

Oh do fuck off. Subscribe to the National Enquirer. You'll love it.

Posted
4 hours ago, boltonboris said:

The problem is he and they believe that if you appear at a Palestine demo, wanting an end to the slaughter of thousands of children, you ARE glorifying Hamas

...and conversely, if you protest in an attempt to keep threats away from your women and children you ARE 'far right'.

Posted
1 minute ago, Sweep said:

Correct, Neville shouldn't be sacked for what he said. He should be sacked for being a whiny rat faced United scummer though 😁

Very well put sir.

Posted
34 minutes ago, royal white said:

I see the usual tards are out demonstrating in London, the ones with the “ceasefire in Palestine now” signs. Does someone want to tell them? 

They want me the complete annihilation of Israel. No ifs, no buts,  that is their simple goal

Anyone denying this is an utter clown

Posted
2 minutes ago, royal white said:

According to ch4 news there’s was 100k at the Tommy Robinson march. Also according to them there was 500k today on the Palestine one 🤦🏻 

Not at all bias

I thought they were all dead 🤔 

Some silence from the usual cretins on here tonight

Posted

And Palestine still doesn’t exist as a state. There is no viable plan yet for statehood & settlements continue to grow rapidly in the West Bank. 

So the pro Palestine mob are hardly going to give Trump a round of applause and stop protesting.

 

Posted
12 minutes ago, London Wanderer said:

And Palestine still doesn’t exist as a state. There is no viable plan yet for statehood & settlements continue to grow rapidly in the West Bank. 

So the pro Palestine mob are hardly going to give Trump a round of applause and stop protesting.

 

Yep all that’s makes sense for a march in London 🤪🤪

Posted
14 minutes ago, London Wanderer said:

And Palestine still doesn’t exist as a state. There is no viable plan yet for statehood & settlements continue to grow rapidly in the West Bank. 

So the pro Palestine mob are hardly going to give Trump a round of applause and stop protesting.

 

Go to bed you wet fart

Posted

And I'll give the southern based Wanderer a final clue....come to Humza's constituency next month on Remembrance Sunday, please be my guest.

For clarification, check his social media posts from the other year when I'm with him, the year before he become the 'First Minister'

I'll be with him again 4 weeks tomorrow along with Chris Stephen's from the SNP. We drink together very amicably on that day

That's your invite, let's see how good your excuses are 

Posted

I see the perma-offended snowflakes have now turned their impotent fury on to Canterbury Cathedral, where the Dean of thee church has put some posters up that replicate graffiti.

A church they’ve never been to, which is the main church of all the other churches they’ve never been to, has made a small display they don’t like and now they want everyone sacking immediately.

These great modern day warriors, who claim to be saving us from the malignant clutches of speech suppression and freedom of thought, are foaming at the mouth about <double checks> yes, some stickers on a wall that will be taken down after Sunday school.

I remember our vicar putting posters up in the church at St Simon’s in 1985 or thereabouts, that advertised the devil and his tempting holidays. Fortunately it was 1985 and we didn’t have self righteous cunts with social media thumbs to tell us the vicar was destroying British values.

let it snow, let it snow, let it snow.

Posted
1 hour ago, Spider said:

I see the perma-offended snowflakes have now turned their impotent fury on to Canterbury Cathedral, where the Dean of thee church has put some posters up that replicate graffiti.

A church they’ve never been to, which is the main church of all the other churches they’ve never been to, has made a small display they don’t like and now they want everyone sacking immediately.

These great modern day warriors, who claim to be saving us from the malignant clutches of speech suppression and freedom of thought, are foaming at the mouth about <double checks> yes, some stickers on a wall that will be taken down after Sunday school.

I remember our vicar putting posters up in the church at St Simon’s in 1985 or thereabouts, that advertised the devil and his tempting holidays. Fortunately it was 1985 and we didn’t have self righteous cunts with social media thumbs to tell us the vicar was destroying British values.

let it snow, let it snow, let it 

I thought it was a decent idea - with marginal communities included. I thought Christians wanted to make the church more relevant, increase attendances, get in the national discussion?

Its just the same old, same old; they only want one form of culture. Its all about exclusion.

Posted
16 minutes ago, Not in Crawley said:

I thought it was a decent idea - with marginal communities included. I thought Christians wanted to make the church more relevant, increase attendances, get in the national discussion?

Its just the same old, same old; they only want one form of culture. Its all about exclusion.

I’d imagine regular church goers want to make the church more relevant. Unfortunately, its being used by a load of non-attending bellsniffs who suddenly think they only need to post a picture of a cross and a knight in chain mail setting off to slaughter Turks, and it makes them Christian crusaders who’ve been defending the faith their entire lives.

Brilliant to watch.

Posted

There are plenty of regular churchgoers who are very disappointed with it

But besides, I'm not sure who it's supposed to convince

Who is this demographic of people in "marginalised communities" who don't attend church but might be convinced to attend church on the basis of some very, very safe slogans pretend graffittied inside the church building?

It seems incredibly cringe (and more than a bit patronising)

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.