tyldesley_white Posted January 22, 2010 Posted January 22, 2010 didn't Taylor start out as a LB for Pompey? JSL I think he did
BWFC_LOVE Posted January 22, 2010 Posted January 22, 2010 Taylor was at Luton then played left wing back for Pompey when they won the Championship. In any case he is a woeful defender and certainly not the answer. If he was any good at left back, Pompey wouldn't have got rid an he'd have played instead of Hreidarsson who was past it.
revdishydave Posted January 22, 2010 Posted January 22, 2010 can anyone provide a montage? is he as good as braaten/wilhelmsen? can this be backed up with some championship manager stats???
tylswhite Posted January 22, 2010 Posted January 22, 2010 jussi Steinsson Knight Cahill Gardener CYL Cohen Muamba Taylor Weiss SKD ? How do we reckon Taylor would perform as a forward ?? No Klasnic?
Dodgywheel Posted January 22, 2010 Posted January 22, 2010 I'll take this signing looked very good against arsenal in the cup, although wouldn't have thought a few years ago we would be loaning city players, how things change, it certainly is a funny old game this football.
only1swanny Posted January 22, 2010 Posted January 22, 2010 I'll take this signing looked very good against arsenal in the cup, although wouldn't have thought a few years ago we would be loaning city players, how things change, it certainly is a funny old game this football. aye but city have bought that many players that the squad players are premiership quality.. They want him playing to pump up his value, and tbh he seems pretty good and the city fans love him ! if we had massive transfer budgets it would be the other way round still..
Underpants Posted January 22, 2010 Posted January 22, 2010 Speaking to some City fans today and they reckon he's a good un.
tarian1979 Posted January 22, 2010 Posted January 22, 2010 Taylor was at Luton then played left wing back for Pompey when they won the Championship. In any case he is a woeful defender and certainly not the answer. If he was any good at left back, Pompey wouldn't have got rid an he'd have played instead of Hreidarsson who was past it. HE CANT BE WORSE THAN ROBINSON play him there until the summer, if hes awful sign someone new
mixup Posted January 22, 2010 Posted January 22, 2010 Sorry to keep beating on about it but Ricardo Gardner is the best left back we have had since Tony Dunne and he was the best we have had since Tommy Banks about 50 years ago. Just do it Owen!
land_and_sea Posted January 22, 2010 Posted January 22, 2010 Sorry to keep beating on about it but Ricardo Gardner is the best left back we have had since Tony Dunne and he was the best we have had since Tommy Banks about 50 years ago. Just do it Owen! With Ricky at left back we had clean sheets as well.Let him and Cahill sort out our defence.
Casino Posted January 22, 2010 Posted January 22, 2010 i don't know how anybody can't see how good gardner is can only guess its thought to be better for his knees if he doesn't play full back can't think of any other justification for his being overlooked
tarian1979 Posted January 22, 2010 Posted January 22, 2010 i don't know how anybody can't see how good gardner is can only guess its thought to be better for his knees if he doesn't play full back can't think of any other justification for his being overlooked 2 be honest i wouldnt complain if gardner was picked at left back.far better than the two thats played there this season
Burndens Bogs Posted January 22, 2010 Posted January 22, 2010 i don't know how anybody can't see how good gardner is can only guess its thought to be better for his knees if he doesn't play full back can't think of any other justification for his being overlooked Other than the fact he can't defend.
tarian1979 Posted January 23, 2010 Posted January 23, 2010 Gives the ball away quite often ROBINSON AND SAMUEL HAVENT HAD A GOOD GAME BETWEEN THEM
Ratwhite Posted January 23, 2010 Posted January 23, 2010 jussi Steinsson Knight Cahill Gardener CYL Cohen Muamba Taylor Weiss SKD ? How do we reckon Taylor would perform as a forward ?? Best ive head this week
bwfcol Posted January 23, 2010 Posted January 23, 2010 ROBINSON AND SAMUEL HAVENT HAD A GOOD GAME BETWEEN THEM I disagree about Robinson, he actually played well last week against Arsenal and has also been OK in the majority of other games. I have a feeling he will never be liked because he is linked to Megson
HomerJay Posted January 23, 2010 Posted January 23, 2010 I disagree about Robinson, he actually played well last week against Arsenal and has also been OK in the majority of other games. I have a feeling he will never be liked because he is linked to Megson i disagree about samuel too. they are both just very inconsistant. neither are fantastic, robbo is the better defender but samuel the better 'footballer'. gardner is a better fullback than both.
Smiley Posted January 23, 2010 Posted January 23, 2010 Hearing very very good things about this lad from City fans. Apparently they've had him at the club since he was 12 and he has bags and bags of potential. Meant to be very quick as well. Can play either flank.
birch-chorley Posted January 23, 2010 Posted January 23, 2010 Speaking to some City fans today and they reckon he's a good un. Herd the same, looks like we may have a decent player on our hands.
Gonk Posted January 23, 2010 Posted January 23, 2010 Herd the same, looks like we may have a decent player on our hands. Man City = our feeder club?
HoldensHairdo Posted January 23, 2010 Posted January 23, 2010 After Jussi performance the other night, I would keep his head down is he eligible today?
cbwfcd Posted January 23, 2010 Posted January 23, 2010 (edited) Has it even been on the official site yet? Edited January 23, 2010 by cbwfcd
Rembrandt Posted January 23, 2010 Posted January 23, 2010 Man City = our feeder club? He's only on loan, so is it .... Bolton = City nursery club. It's a worrying trend in the English leagues. Look how many players the rich few clubs have out on loan elsewhere.
Recommended Posts