Tonge moor green jacket Posted yesterday at 17:35 Posted yesterday at 17:35 2 hours ago, Sweep said: What it does show, is like when the Conservatives were in power last time, all the opposition needs to do is sit back and wait for them to destroy themselves from within, which they're now starting to do Same play book as before. Whatever folk think of Badenoch, she seems to have learned from Starmer. Don't do anything substantial, just attack on certain issues, and let the PM fuck himself. Quote
Tonge moor green jacket Posted yesterday at 17:38 Posted yesterday at 17:38 2 hours ago, mickbrown said: And more have signed a letter saying they want him to stay. All a bit of a shitshow It is. Doesn't matter how many support him, if the threshold has been met, then it paves the way for someone to put their head above the parapet. He is a dead man walking, and the cabinet can't win either way. Quote
Not in Crawley Posted yesterday at 17:56 Posted yesterday at 17:56 Well its fucked up another photocall today for me - all the ringers are just camping out at Downing Street. Bugger. Quote
Lt. Aldo Raine Posted yesterday at 17:59 Posted yesterday at 17:59 20 minutes ago, Tonge moor green jacket said: It is. Doesn't matter how many support him, if the threshold has been met, then it paves the way for someone to put their head above the parapet. He is a dead man walking, and the cabinet can't win either way. No threshold has been met Quote
mickbrown Posted 23 hours ago Posted 23 hours ago 1 hour ago, Tonge moor green jacket said: Same play book as before. Whatever folk think of Badenoch, she seems to have learned from Starmer. Don't do anything substantial, just attack on certain issues, and let the PM fuck himself. I’m curious. Just how has he fucked himself? Quote
Cheese Posted 23 hours ago Posted 23 hours ago 35 minutes ago, Lt. Aldo Raine said: No threshold has been met He seems to think the 1922 Committee rules apply to all parties. Quote
Not in Crawley Posted 23 hours ago Posted 23 hours ago 11 minutes ago, Cheese said: He seems to think the 1922 Committee rules apply to all parties. To be fair because of the media's coverage of the endless Tory party contests most people think every party is run the same way. Goes back the hill I will die on that basic political education of how our country is run should be taught in year 7 and 8 included in PSE. Quote
Not in Crawley Posted 23 hours ago Posted 23 hours ago 14 minutes ago, mickbrown said: I’m curious. Just how has he fucked himself? He's boring. We world doesnt do boring anymore, just 40 second soundbites on tiktok Quote
Not in Crawley Posted 23 hours ago Posted 23 hours ago 5 hours ago, bolton va va said: I expect Starmer to survive a bit longer because of the lack of a replacement. Streeting seems to be unpopular in labour circles ( I don't know the reason ),Burnham unlike Starmer is a competent politician but an obvious bullshitter & can't stand anyway as a non MP & deary me, Angela Rayner would be labour's Liz Truss !! Because despite being a working class bloke he's on the right of the party. The soft left won't have him. And he was very close to Mandelson in his jr years - plus London and gay. Liberals on the soft left, are very selective in their liberalism. Quote
London Wanderer Posted 23 hours ago Posted 23 hours ago Some proper morons coming out the woodwork these days Quote
Not in Crawley Posted 22 hours ago Posted 22 hours ago 5 minutes ago, London Wanderer said: Some proper morons coming out the woodwork these days Well she's lying, LBC is just off trafalgar square! Fake News! Quote
Nowack Posted 22 hours ago Posted 22 hours ago Just now, Not in Crawley said: Well she's lying, LBC is just off trafalgar square! Fake News! And the only place to buy a mango is Pete Beales market stall Quote
royal white Posted 22 hours ago Posted 22 hours ago Nice to see there’s a few Starmer loyals still backing him on here. To the death! Quote
Not in Crawley Posted 22 hours ago Posted 22 hours ago I don't see anyone backing him here, stop being a giddy chops. Quote
royal white Posted 22 hours ago Posted 22 hours ago 3 minutes ago, Not in Crawley said: I don't see anyone backing him here, stop being a giddy chops. Oh, it was only a few days ago he was doing a good job according to some. So for the first time ever everyone on the politics thread is in agreement. Amazing. #StarmerOut Quote
Not in Crawley Posted 21 hours ago Posted 21 hours ago 4 minutes ago, royal white said: Oh, it was only a few days ago he was doing a good job according to some. So for the first time ever everyone on the politics thread is in agreement. Amazing. #StarmerOut Also those people didn't say he wasnt doing a good job. Discussion points such as this demonstrate all too painfully clearly how the emptiest buckets think politics work. Quote
royal white Posted 21 hours ago Posted 21 hours ago 9 minutes ago, Not in Crawley said: Also those people didn't say he wasnt doing a good job. Discussion points such as this demonstrate all too painfully clearly how the emptiest buckets think politics work. I know, they said he was doing a good job. It’s there in black and white and you have replied to it. Empty buckets and all that Quote
Not in Crawley Posted 21 hours ago Posted 21 hours ago (edited) 8 minutes ago, royal white said: I know, they said he was doing a good job. It’s there in black and white and you have replied to it. Empty buckets and all that Sigh 🙄 We won't agree, its not about point scoring, I think you've missed the point I was saying, so its once again best left there when you are in your usual mood. Edited 21 hours ago by Not in Crawley Quote
royal white Posted 21 hours ago Posted 21 hours ago 2 minutes ago, Not in Crawley said: Sigh 🙄 We won't agree, its not about point scoring, I think you've missed the point I was saying, so its once again best left there when you are in your usual mood. Sigh. like last week you clearly have trouble reading. How can I understand any point you make when it makes zero sense? Just read the last couple of comments and try and make sense of them. Quote
London Wanderer Posted 21 hours ago Posted 21 hours ago (edited) 43 minutes ago, royal white said: Oh, it was only a few days ago he was doing a good job according to some. Who said Starmer was doing a good job? Edited 21 hours ago by London Wanderer Quote
royal white Posted 21 hours ago Posted 21 hours ago 12 minutes ago, London Wanderer said: Who said Starmer was doing a good job? You’d have to scroll back sweetheart, I’m sure they listed his achievements as well. #StarmerOut Quote
London Wanderer Posted 21 hours ago Posted 21 hours ago 1 minute ago, royal white said: You’d have to scroll back sweetheart So you don't know then 😂 I agree though - Starmer out. Not sure it will get Labour through the next election though. Can't see anyone other than Reform winning. Quote
Spider Posted 21 hours ago Posted 21 hours ago Starmer has been better than the last 3/4 prime ministers I’ll let you all decide where the bar needs to be set for that. Quote
MalcolmW Posted 20 hours ago Posted 20 hours ago 2 hours ago, mickbrown said: I’m curious. Just how has he fucked himself? By saying very esrly that he would aleways retain Rachel Reeves as Chancellor. She showed very early that she did not understand that she could not control outside forces on the economy. So unwise to s ay she would never increase personal rates of taxation. She has so far managed this by freezing personal allowances, so people know their taxes are rising even though the rates are not. Dropping Winter Fuel payments for all and then re-introducing them for most was utter folly. ] Child benefit limits .... 2 hours ago, mickbrown said: I’m curious. Just how has he fucked himself? Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.