Jump to content
Wanderers Ways. Neil Thompson 1961-2021

Recommended Posts

Posted
7 minutes ago, ZicoKelly said:

They were plenty good enough

Reckon at the start of that season, collectively, the vast amount of games the squad had played were at PL or championship level as opposed to league one or two

I might even spend an hour or so working it out this week if I'm not busy

Exactly. Squad was more than good enough to compete on staying up. Poor ownership and poor management prevailed. Not much else to be said. 

Posted
2 hours ago, Casino said:

Dear me

The great squad myth rolled out again

A squad that had given up on the season before in a way even more pathetic than last season

Who were the great ones

Even our best midfielder joined a car crash club rather than sticking around

I reckon I can chuck in a sticking plaster one for every one you name

Barring ameobi and madine, do any of them currently play above the third level...serious, there might be some, but I cant think of any?

 

Ps I'll give you pratley, but even that's a stretch  :)

Aye, but relative to what we were competing with for automatic promotion 

Our squad was better than the likes of Scunny, Fleetwood, Bradford (our budget was certainly bigger) 

where are those clubs now, have any of their players kicked on above league 1? Genuine question, fucked if I know the answer 

of course the squad wasn’t ‘great’, I.e BSA or Ricoh years, but in relation to what was around us in the league it was. I’d rip your hand off for it right now. Some moon men think we’re in a much better place this time round 

Posted
45 minutes ago, ZicoKelly said:

They were plenty good enough

Reckon at the start of that season, collectively, the vast amount of games the squad had played were at PL or championship level as opposed to league one or two

I might even spend an hour or so working it out this week if I'm not busy

I'd argue that many of those who had played in the PL and the Championship were well on their way to finding their level in League One.

It was a good squad obviously lacking in even a League One quality playmaker, but it wasn't a great one.

Posted
3 hours ago, Lt. Aldo Raine said:

Looking purely at managerial win percentages would only be worthwhile if football was a level playing field. Jack Ross' win percentage at Sunderland is 49.18%, whereas John Coleman's at Accrington Stanley last season was around 30. Yet I'd argue that Coleman keeping Accrington Stanley up was a bigger achievement.

Spot on, I find it a bit lazy when fans and press quote win percentages. Neil Lennon, Darren Moore, Mick Harford, Solskjaer, Emery probably have better win percentages than top managers like Warnock, Redknapp, Coleman, Hughton but it helps if you walk into a club that is nailed on to be top 6ish whether managed by me or Guardiola. 

Posted
54 minutes ago, ZicoKelly said:

They were plenty good enough

Reckon at the start of that season, collectively, the vast amount of games the squad had played were at PL or championship level as opposed to league one or two

I might even spend an hour or so working it out this week if I'm not busy

Where a player has played their career isn’t relevant though. Andrew Taylor has played most of his career in the top two divisions. Including over 100 premiership games. But I’d not call him a championship left back and he’d not get in any championship teams. Probably not get in at least half of league one either.

Wheater has played a lot of top flight football but can’t move now....

In the last decade we’ve had countless teams of ‘has beens’ or ‘never beens’ who have played a lot of football at decent levels. But when we had them they weren’t close to their peak. 

Posted
58 minutes ago, ZicoKelly said:

They were plenty good enough

Reckon at the start of that season, collectively, the vast amount of games the squad had played were at PL or championship level as opposed to league one or two

I might even spend an hour or so working it out this week if I'm not busy

They were binned off by their various clubs precisely because they couldn't cut it at PL or championship level.

Posted

If he wins an injunction we are fucked. But I struggle to see how he does. Though I’d be reassured if an expert in these matters could also confirm that view.

Posted
1 hour ago, Benny The Ball said:

I am anticipating that the hotel will most likely be sold to Football Ventures along with ( and at the same time as  )  the football club. 

The Hotel was owed £985k ( Note 12 Trade Debtors )   in the accounts  as at 30 June 2017 by " Group Undertakings " in other words the football club. 

This will have most likely  risen substantially  since that date as the hotel has paid out staff wages for the football club and will have also allowed use of the hotel by staff from the football club which wont have been paid for. 

If at the point of entering administration that inter company debt stood at lets  say  £1.6 million in the hotels books , then because the administration has been split into two , effectively that £1.6 million is an unsecured creditor in the football clubs books and the club will pay the hotel a reported 25p in the £ along with the other unsecured creditors . Therefore the hotel will over time recoup circa £400k from the football club . 

The Hotel is reputed to have been valued at circa £4.5 - £6 million 

If the hotel is sold to Football Ventures then most likely most of the cash  received by the administrator will go to pay off KA with the balance going to the unsecured creditors. 

Then most likely James will  as you suggest write off most of what he is currently owed and put in place a new charge 

That's how I see it proceeding - and to be honest I struggle to see it being sold separately , because under such circumstances where it is sold separately  neither James ( wanting ownership of the club and the hotel ) or  Anderson ( wanting his money back ) would be satisfied with the outcome , unless someone comes along and pays £10 million plus for it , which is well above what its valued at. 

Thank you very much Benny, I greatly appreciate the explanation, details and insights you've kindly provided.

It makes a great deal more sense to me now  as to how the hotel (and probably Ken's secured charge) fits into what is happening and the likely outcome.

If so that would mean Mike James taking a big hit on the Hotel - possibly the full £5.5m if the new owner only pays around £5m for it - being the sum required to satisfy Anderson's charge (assuming he hasn't agreed to take a reduction on it).  Presumably if FV, or whoever the purchaser turns out to be, they will pay the Administrator (for the Hotel) the agreed sale price (let's say £5m) the amount who in turn settles Anderson in full and (assuming that the Administrators fees and charges are also settled in full from Hotel's assets) the Hotel can then exit Administration.

As far as I understand things, although James is a Director of FV he is not the owner, there being two shares, one owned by Basran, the other by Sharon Brittan, so MJ would have lost his money.  Maybe the suggestion that 'FV' isn't the Company that ultimately brings the club (possibly the Hotel too?) out of Admin could be true with instead a company where MJ (and possibly even EDT) are part of the shareholders and as such owners of the club - ie they own the company that owns the club.

Maybe FV buys the club from the Admins and sell it on to the 'new' company for a predetermined fee, who then brings the club out of Administration - or something along those lines?

Thanks once again for your clear and detailed explanation above.

Posted
On 29/06/2019 at 20:38, Burnden Pies said:

I really don't like you. Why don't you just GTF?

I’m not sure why, I simply queried if that truly was the ‘best’ bid, a point that seems more pertinent following Mr Bassini’s most recent claims. 

FWIW I don’t like acronyms.

Posted
On 29/06/2019 at 20:39, Mantra said:

You also said the FV bid was dead. Apparently not.

It’s dead in the sense that it’s not legally enforceable, or compliant with any administration rules.

Posted
23 hours ago, Mantra said:

I’m not reading between the lines of the statement, I’m just going off what Casino said. Not sure if he is reading between the lines or getting info from someone else.

Feel free to enlighten us by the way on what was a better offer for the club.

Look, maybe you’re right and FV bid wasn’t the best of the lot, but perhaps because they’ve been in it for 7 months and have made a lot of headway with creditors anyway, it was the best bid because it would take the shortest time to sort out.

Im sure the administrators would have happily sold it to someone with much deeper pockets.

Are you so sure now?

Posted
23 hours ago, Benny The Ball said:

 

 

 

 

 

 

You do have rather a lot to say for yourself .............. whats your issue ? 

From the chap who believed the Gaspard bid was legitimate.

Posted
Just now, Damocles said:

It’s dead in the sense that it’s not legally enforceable, or compliant with any administration rules.

Bassini comes across as a fantasist. He hasn’t backed up one claim as of yet? 

Even daft things like giving the brentford ticket refunds yet. I’m not sure he can be taken seriously  

Posted
3 minutes ago, Damocles said:

I’m not sure why, I simply queried if that truly was the ‘best’ bid, a point that seems more pertinent following Mr Bassini’s most recent claims. 

FWIW I don’t like acronyms.

Ok just take your sword and fuck off. That clear enough?

Posted
1 hour ago, bwfcfan5 said:

Where a player has played their career isn’t relevant though. 

It is when you're comparing the relative quality of squads in the same league and as such setting expectations for how they will get on

It's how you're confidently able to say something's like "we are better than Scunthorpe"

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.