Jump to content
Wanderers Ways. Neil Thompson 1961-2021

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
9 hours ago, athywhite1958 said:

 

'The standard of proof in civil cases is lower than in criminal cases, meaning that jurors were only required to find that it was more likely than not that Mr Trump assaulted Ms Carroll.'

Balance of probability which I suppose will happen here in the future with no jury trials

...and he's trawling up shit from 2023. Part of the Biden campaign to stop Trump being re-elected.

Worked eh?

Edited by bolty58
Posted
9 hours ago, kent_white said:

It's frightening mate. But too complicated to easily cover on the news I suppose. 

I'll keep saying it. Donald Trump is an authoritarian leader - I wouldn't quite call him a fascist - but some of his rhetoric isn't a million miles away. 

And he is systematically stripping away the institutions, checks and balances that have made the US the most successful country in the world. And pivoting it towards who knows what. 

The UK is in a real mess. And we need to rethink who we throw our lot in with. We're largely a service economy -  give it 10 years when AI can do most of the service economy jobs (better and at a fraction of the price) and we REALLY WILL be in trouble. 

Sadly we have a populace that are happy to throw our economic future under the bus if it means that they can labour under the misapprehension than fewer brown people will arrive on small boats, even though we told them at the time that the opposite would happen, and even though the countries birth rate is too low to survive without immigration. 

Still - fewer weird looking people in town so it's not all bad eh? We can all enjoy our poorly paid, manual labour surrounded by our colleagues with pure ayrian skull shapes so, every cloud! 

What fucking drivel. Kind of thing I would expect from a NHS employed union member.

Oh, hang on.............

Posted

Increase in spending is indeed something which he pushed, and got.

He is right about our migration issues.

He has gone too far though now. 

He is backtracking on his previous comments about getting a settlement, again. For the umpteenth time.

Unless there is one all might international cloak and dagger effort going on, then I can no longer see any use in his involvement. 

Spitting his dummy out because VZ doesn't want to concede land.

I saw a comment from someone claiming that by his (the US's) proposed actions- the peace plan- then they would be in breach of over 20 treaties/agreements. 

He's not the only one being lilly livered- comments from some senior in the Belgian hierarchy suggest similar, but he is the one who has been the loudest, and "pushing the peace deal".

Either the US is "in" with the necessary support for Ukraine, to help win the peace, or they should indeed back out.

I can only hope that behind the scenes American assistance is unofficially continuing.

The f16s are reportedly getting an upgrade with a rocket system that will allow them to shoot down more Russian drones per sortie, at a much lower cost. This system is American.

It's a big mess.

Posted
11 minutes ago, royal white said:

This has to  be a parody account 😂 “massive solidarity”

That will show those Israelis 

 

 

They'll be shitting themselves in 'Tel A Viv'.

Mossad? Wait til they meet Moss Bank Jihad.

Posted
5 hours ago, bolty58 said:

They'll be shitting themselves in 'Tel A Viv'.

Mossad? Wait til they meet Moss Bank Jihad.

There's a place for you somewhere warming up for that weird looking ginger 'comic' that was doing the rounds on here a few months ago.

Posted
8 hours ago, bolty58 said:

...and he's trawling up shit from 2023. Part of the Biden campaign to stop Trump being re-elected.

Worked eh?

“Trawling up shit” 😂😂

You mean just answering a question with facts, that “your Don” had been found guilty of sexual assault by a jury.

You can’t make it go away you know. It did happen. The judiciary wasn’t weaponised. I’m surprised you’re comfortable just laughing it off - you must think it’s ok therefore for blokes to do this?

Posted
3 hours ago, Bertie said:

“Trawling up shit” 😂😂

You mean just answering a question with facts, that “your Don” had been found guilty of sexual assault by a jury.

You can’t make it go away you know. It did happen. The judiciary wasn’t weaponised. I’m surprised you’re comfortable just laughing it off - you must think it’s ok therefore for blokes to do this?

Would you  be happy being found guilty of 'likely' doing something wrong?:

Posted
25 minutes ago, athywhite1958 said:

Would you  be happy being found guilty of 'likely' doing something wrong?:

You were bemoaning David Lammy for reducing the number of Jury trials the other day, now you're saying Jury verdicts aren't to be trusted. Make your mind up.

Posted
51 minutes ago, Cheese said:

You were bemoaning David Lammy for reducing the number of Jury trials the other day, now you're saying Jury verdicts aren't to be trusted. Make your mind up.

Lammy's over in Strasbourg today quoting Henry VI Part 2... "Kill the Lawyers"

Posted
24 minutes ago, athywhite1958 said:

I would like a jury in criminal matters, civil matters are a totally different thing as you well know

Why, if you don't trust their verdict?

Posted
5 minutes ago, athywhite1958 said:

Where have I said that I don't trust them

Trump was found liable for Sexual Assault by a Jury, and for some weird reason you're questioning the verdict...

Posted
11 minutes ago, athywhite1958 said:

No, no, no, I asked had he been jailed, I did not question the jury or their verdict

It's quite clear above. Bertie said Trump "had been found guilty of Sexual Assault by a Jury", and you questioned if he'd be happy with that if he was the defendant, obviously casting doubt on the verdict.

Posted
Just now, Cheese said:

It's quite clear above. Bertie said Trump "had been found guilty of Sexual Assault by a Jury", and you questioned if he'd be happy with that if he was the defendant, obviously casting doubt on the verdict.

I asked if he would be happy with the verdict given that it was likely to have happened rather than it did happen, I know I wouldn't

Posted
18 minutes ago, athywhite1958 said:

I asked if he would be happy with the verdict given that it was likely to have happened rather than it did happen, I know I wouldn't

That's the case for every verdict handed down by a Jury. 🤦‍♂️

Posted
18 minutes ago, athywhite1958 said:

Is it fuck,

Try telling that to the guy from Liverpool that’s just done 30 years before he’s just been proven innocent by a DNA test. Last I heard he’s still not had an apology from Merseyside police.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.