Mounts Kipper Posted September 3, 2019 Share Posted September 3, 2019 4 minutes ago, mickbrown said: Well this is going well It is isn’t it, 19% in the polls.😂 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter Tonge moor green jacket Posted September 3, 2019 Site Supporter Share Posted September 3, 2019 2 minutes ago, L/H White said: Brilliant ain't it, who said we'd be out in months? First PM called it on and bottled it, 2nd was a waste of space, and I've no words for bozza. Comical, shambolic, mess. As was detailed earlier, a quick election, and a working majority of just 1 allows Boris the opportunity to repeal tonight's change. By eliminating remain MPs that's not out of the question. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mickbrown Posted September 3, 2019 Share Posted September 3, 2019 19 minutes ago, miamiwhite said: Stop being such a self centred twat for once and think of other industries that will benefit from it. Which industries? Genuine question. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter Tonge moor green jacket Posted September 3, 2019 Site Supporter Share Posted September 3, 2019 4 minutes ago, Mounts Kipper said: It is isn’t it, 19% in the polls.😂 What's that 19%? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
L/H White Posted September 3, 2019 Share Posted September 3, 2019 Just now, Tonge moor green jacket said: As was detailed earlier, a quick election, and a working majority of just 1 allows Boris the opportunity to repeal tonight's change. By eliminating remain MPs that's not out of the question. I meant when it first happened, someone on here said it would take months and we'd be out Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Salford Trotter Posted September 3, 2019 Share Posted September 3, 2019 2 minutes ago, Tonge moor green jacket said: Irrelevant. Parliament voted to have a referendum, then voted to enact it, and voted it into law. What type of deal wasn't talked about, perhaps it should have been. But it wasn't, and therefore incumbent upon government. Parliament can and has changed its mind, which it is entitled to do. As escobarp put it, in doing so they have reneged on what they promised without standing on that ticket. Consequently the government plays dirty. Bag of wank all round. At least the conservative party will now start to align behind a policy, as MPs are booted out. Better for a general election. strangely i think kicking out MPs (both Tory and Labour) will eventually lead to a split vote at a GE as they start to stand as independent candidates or perhaps for another party just in the same way TBP putting up candidates will split the leave vote as per Brecon. The party leaders will have to be on their mettle to avoid embarrassing themselves at the ballot box Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miamiwhite Posted September 3, 2019 Author Share Posted September 3, 2019 1 minute ago, mickbrown said: Which industries? Genuine question. Google is your friend fella, I’m off to bed x Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter Tonge moor green jacket Posted September 3, 2019 Site Supporter Share Posted September 3, 2019 Just now, L/H White said: I meant when it first happened, someone on here said it would take months and we'd be out Well that was never going to happen; article 50 itself had a time frame. Don't think many really thought it would be done quickly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ani Posted September 3, 2019 Share Posted September 3, 2019 4 minutes ago, Tonge moor green jacket said: Irrelevant. Parliament voted to have a referendum, then voted to enact it, and voted it into law. What type of deal wasn't talked about, perhaps it should have been. But it wasn't, and therefore incumbent upon government. Parliament can and has changed its mind, which it is entitled to do. As escobarp put it, in doing so they have reneged on what they promised without standing on that ticket. Consequently the government plays dirty. Bag of wank all round. At least the conservative party will now start to align behind a policy, as MPs are booted out. Better for a general election. The type of deal was talked about and virtually all the major supporters dismissed no deal as project fear. This not about democracy it is about a very small number of incredibly rich individuals engineering a result that suits themselves. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter Tonge moor green jacket Posted September 3, 2019 Site Supporter Share Posted September 3, 2019 1 minute ago, Salford Trotter said: strangely i think kicking out MPs (both Tory and Labour) will eventually lead to a split vote at a GE as they start to stand as independent candidates or perhaps for another party just in the same way TBP putting up candidates will split the leave vote as per Brecon. The party leaders will have to be on their mettle to avoid embarrassing themselves at the ballot box Very probably. Though from the Tory's perspective, to a avoid too much of a bp invasion, they need to present a unified position. Remainers undermining the stance would make things much worse. Labour may have to look at itself too. Far from a clear position. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter Tonge moor green jacket Posted September 3, 2019 Site Supporter Share Posted September 3, 2019 3 minutes ago, Ani said: The type of deal was talked about and virtually all the major supporters dismissed no deal as project fear. This not about democracy it is about a very small number of incredibly rich individuals engineering a result that suits themselves. How. This never makes sense. If Britain was to go to ratshit, how does that benefit these rich folk, who presumably have vested interests in British industry? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bwfcfan5 Posted September 3, 2019 Share Posted September 3, 2019 (edited) 2 minutes ago, Tonge moor green jacket said: How. This never makes sense. If Britain was to go to ratshit, how does that benefit these rich folk, who presumably have vested interests in British industry? Have you not seen the rich Brexiteers betting against the British economy and the pound? Edited September 3, 2019 by bwfcfan5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Salford Trotter Posted September 3, 2019 Share Posted September 3, 2019 3 minutes ago, Tonge moor green jacket said: Very probably. Though from the Tory's perspective, to a avoid too much of a bp invasion, they need to present a unified position. Remainers undermining the stance would make things much worse. Labour may have to look at itself too. Far from a clear position. I agree, i think the leave side are more likely to coalesce one message and this is where the arrogance of Corbyn and not working with Swinson/Blackford maybe their downfall. Hopefully the enormity of the prize will focus the remain camp Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bwfcfan5 Posted September 3, 2019 Share Posted September 3, 2019 Boris has just sacked Winston Churchill’s grandson. Brilliant. Tories now further to the extremes than Labour under Corbyn. Truly frightening. Shame May didn’t throw Boris out when he voted against his own party twice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter Tonge moor green jacket Posted September 3, 2019 Site Supporter Share Posted September 3, 2019 Hasn't Swinson herself said no to Corbyn? In fairness to JC, he has an impossible job. He could massively alienate a huge amount of his core support. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Salford Trotter Posted September 3, 2019 Share Posted September 3, 2019 5 minutes ago, Tonge moor green jacket said: How. This never makes sense. If Britain was to go to ratshit, how does that benefit these rich folk, who presumably have vested interests in British industry? many have already moved their wealth abroad e.g. Dyson, JRM and Lawson Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kent_white Posted September 3, 2019 Share Posted September 3, 2019 That photo of JRM. Could be a Miliband bacon sandwich moment. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter Tonge moor green jacket Posted September 3, 2019 Site Supporter Share Posted September 3, 2019 2 minutes ago, bwfcfan5 said: Boris has just sacked Winston Churchill’s grandson. Brilliant. Tories now further to the extremes than Labour under Corbyn. Truly frightening. Shame May didn’t throw Boris out when he voted against his own party twice. Frightening? Bit dramatic. They can stand as independent MPs or join another party. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter Tonge moor green jacket Posted September 3, 2019 Site Supporter Share Posted September 3, 2019 1 minute ago, Salford Trotter said: many have already moved their wealth abroad e.g. Dyson, JRM and Lawson JRM manages funds internationally doesn't he. I'm sure all funds will use opportunities wherever they are. Dyson moved some manufacturing years ago. He's also not an MP. Neither is Lawson. So let's revisit it. How many MPs have got interests that would benefit from the UK going to ratshit? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter Tonge moor green jacket Posted September 3, 2019 Site Supporter Share Posted September 3, 2019 4 minutes ago, kent_white said: That photo of JRM. Could be a Miliband bacon sandwich moment. Hasn't Lucas chastised him? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Salford Trotter Posted September 3, 2019 Share Posted September 3, 2019 2 minutes ago, Tonge moor green jacket said: Hasn't Swinson herself said no to Corbyn? In fairness to JC, he has an impossible job. He could massively alienate a huge amount of his core support. She has said she won't have him leading a Gvt of National Unity but I understand she is open to working with him on a progressive alliance to strategically fight constituencies where the remain candidate will be better served by not splitting the vote. Whether Corbyn sees that as a weakness remains to be seen. Based on current polls the Lib Dems would take 23 seats from Torys (18) and Labour (5) and with an alliance you will likely see Raab's seat go yellow too. Coupled with the potential demise of the Torys in Scotland you are looking at a hung parliament unless something dramatic changes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter Tonge moor green jacket Posted September 3, 2019 Site Supporter Share Posted September 3, 2019 Yes, wouldn't disagree. That's when the BP come into the reckoning. Their presence then increases the likelihood of a no deal situation as they will push for it as part of any agreement with Tories. As the lady on the radio explained, a tiny majority with support from whoever and today's events are wiped. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Farrelli Posted September 3, 2019 Share Posted September 3, 2019 Ken Clarke's comments: "The most right wing cabinet ever". "the PM comes and talks absolute Rubbish to us". Bet he's glad to be retiring Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Salford Trotter Posted September 3, 2019 Share Posted September 3, 2019 8 minutes ago, Tonge moor green jacket said: JRM manages funds internationally doesn't he. I'm sure all funds will use opportunities wherever they are. Dyson moved some manufacturing years ago. He's also not an MP. Neither is Lawson. So let's revisit it. How many MPs have got interests that would benefit from the UK going to ratshit? Referring to Brexit, the fund’s prospectus said: “During, and possibly after, this period there is likely to be considerable uncertainty as to the position of the UK and the arrangements which will apply to its relationships with the EU and other countries following its withdrawal. It goes onto say a No Deal Brexit would increase costs and make it difficult to pursue objectives “As [the firm is] based in the UK and a fund’s investments may be located in the UK or the EU, a fund may as a result be affected by the events described above.” The fund also warned its clients directly of the dangers of a hard Brexit, saying it would “increase costs” and make it difficult to pursue its objectives. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Salford Trotter Posted September 3, 2019 Share Posted September 3, 2019 2 minutes ago, Tonge moor green jacket said: Yes, wouldn't disagree. That's when the BP come into the reckoning. Their presence then increases the likelihood of a no deal situation as they will push for it as part of any agreement with Tories. As the lady on the radio explained, a tiny majority with support from whoever and today's events are wiped. TBP and the Torys split the vote in Brecon, otherwise the Tories would have won Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.