Meanwhile In England

[DazBob]

1 minute ago, royal white said:

Well I was asking regarding the video 

I've no idea. I haven't watched it. Nor will I.

[jmjhb]

Seems like people are putting up a picture of the Annecy attacker and claiming it was him

Almost like they're trying to politicise it.

Edited July 29, 2024 by jmjhb

[royal white]

Just now, Sweep said:

What if the brown people said they weren't Muslim, and that they'd converted to Christianity, would we have to let them in then? 

I'm not asking you (or anybody in particular), just pointing out a bit of a flat in that ridiculous "option" 

I just want to know how that is more hate speech than the PM saying send Bangladeshi folk back .

[Sweep]

Just now, jmjhb said:

Seems like people are putting up a picture of the Annecy attacker and claiming it was him

Strap yourself in, there going to be loads of that shit, which is why I expect the Police to name him pretty quickly

[royal white]

Just now, DazBob said:

I've no idea. I haven't watched it. Nor will I.

Well he said he’d like a temporary ban on Muslim immigration.

 

The PM wants Bangladeshi folk sent back. 
 

which would you class as hate speech 

[little whitt]

1 minute ago, Sweep said:

Strap yourself in, there going to be loads of that shit, which is why I expect the Police to name him pretty quickly

bet its not 

Jones

from Cardiff 

[Zico]

6 minutes ago, royal white said:

Whats wrong with the first thing he said which was a temporary ban on Muslim immigration. Is that worse then saying send Bangladeshis back?

Because he's tarring them all with the same brush

Starmer said asylum seekers from Bangladesh would be returned as it's a safe country

[DazBob]

4 minutes ago, gonzo said:

Did he say all?

Who?

If you're referring to Robinson's video then I've no idea.

I was referring to the tweet that implies all of the fuckers in the boats are coming here to murder us.

As has been said by others, Robinson does have some valid points. It's just a shame he's such a horrible cunt and pushes things too far which makes him lose any credibility in my opinion.

[jmjhb]

2 minutes ago, Sweep said:

Strap yourself in, there going to be loads of that shit, which is why I expect the Police to name him pretty quickly

Yeah, they invariably name them when it's a particular atrocity, just thinking of the Brianna Ghey case where they named the duo

[only1swanny]

.

Edited July 29, 2024 by only1swanny

[Guest]

3 minutes ago, royal white said:

I just want to know how that is more hate speech than the PM saying send Bangladeshi folk back .

Maybe because he didn’t say that and didn’t claim that anyone from a specific religion, race and nationality were here to kill/rape us all?

Apart from those trifling details sure….

 

 

[only1swanny]

Just now, jmjhb said:

Yeah, they invariably name them when it's a particular atrocity, just thinking of the Brianna Ghey case where they named the duo

they were not far from being 18 and rightly so were named. Let them live with that for the rest of their lives. 

[bolty58]

14 minutes ago, gonzo said:

I don't think anything he says there is hate speech.

 

It's from Momentum. Formerly Corbyns attack dogs. Anything they put out there is best left unread. Far more dangerous than the so called 'far right'.

[gonzo]

4 minutes ago, jmjhb said:

Seems like people are putting up a picture of the Annecy attacker and claiming it was him

Almost like they're trying to politicise it.

Horrendous.

1 minute ago, DazBob said:

Who?

If you're referring to Robinson's video then I've no idea.

I was referring to the tweet that implies all of the fuckers in the boats are coming here to murder us.

As has been said by others, Robinson does have some valid points. It's just a shame he's such a horrible cunt and pushes things too far which makes him lose any credibility in my opinion.

What we were saying earlier isn't it. It shouldn't be down to a coked up footy hooligan to raise these points.

[royal white]

1 minute ago, Zico said:

Because he's tarring them all with the same brush

Starmer said asylum seekers from Bangladesh would be returned as it's a safe country

And Starmer targeted Bangladeshis even though hardly any come over on boats. So much so he was criticised  by some of his own party 

[bolty58]

14 minutes ago, gonzo said:

My YouTube is littered with it as we've been talking about it on here for 3 weeks solid

 

I wonder if fanny 5 has anything to say about Momentum? Thought not.

[royal white]

2 minutes ago, bwfcfan5 said:

Maybe because he didn’t say that and didn’t claim that anyone from a specific religion, race and nationality were here to kill/rape us all?

Apart from those trifling details sure….

 

 

I mentioned only the first thing TR said I’m the video. 

[Zico]

1 minute ago, royal white said:

And Starmer targeted Bangladeshis even though hardly any come over on boats. So much so he was criticised  by some of his own party 

I think he was using it as an example of how this government are going to start sending asylum seekers who don't have to be here home, for example those who come from a safe country, for example Bangladesh

something that most people want to see more of

something the last goverment wasn't doing

[Guest]

7 minutes ago, royal white said:

And Starmer targeted Bangladeshis even though hardly any come over on boats. So much so he was criticised  by some of his own party 

But he wasn’t saying send them all back or stop them coming he was suggesting those that fail asylum could be returned. 
 
Which is very different to ‘stop all Jews coming here’. Or any other religion or race…

[bolty58]

Still processing what has occurred in Southport. My first instinct was something drug related from Liverpool. I wish it had have been.

At least we all agree it is fucking horrendous. The cunt should be strung up whoever he is.

I'll wait for confirmation of the attackers name. If it's Dyfedd from Cardiff or an unintended consequence of ECHR membership we need to be thinking about the kids and families right now before moving to the next stage.

Interesting that even the appeasers immediately think of Islamic terrorism even if their thought is concluded with "I hope it isn't". If it is, no doubt the pathetic and inaccurate 'you just don't like brown skin' defence will be front and centre yet again. That and "you can't tar them all with the same brush". The latter can be correct. It all depends on your definition of 'them'.

[DazBob]

3 minutes ago, bolty58 said:

At least we all agree it is fucking horrendous. The cunt should be strung up whoever he is.

Something we definitely all agree on.

[Lt. Aldo Raine]

43 minutes ago, Sweep said:

We always hear this. Do we have any idea how many people are allegedly on a "watch list" - there must be loads, and how much do they actually watch them I wonder

It was reported in 2020 that there were 43,000 on it, with nine out of ten linked to Islamic extremism

The reality, of course, is that they can't watch so many very closely, but I think there are though to be around 3,500 who are deemed particularly high-risk

Frightening really

[royal white]

11 minutes ago, bwfcfan5 said:

But he wasn’t saying send them all back or stop them coming he was suggesting those that fail asylum could be returned. 
 
Which is very different to ‘stop all Jews coming here’. Or any other religion or race…

He didn’t once mention failed asylum. A Labour MP resigned because of his words. Maybe he singled out Bangladeshis for a reason hey. 

[bolty58]

Just now, Lt. Aldo Raine said:

It was reported in 2020 that there were 43,000 on it, with nine out of ten linked to Islamic extremism

The reality, of course, is that they can't watch so many very closely, but I think there are though to be around 3,500 who are deemed particularly high-risk

Frightening really

Stop it now. Get with the programme FFS. Throw the borders open and put out the welcome mats. Blair said it. Merkel said it. Plenty on here apparently feel the same way.

They can't be wrong surely?

[Blondi]

8 minutes ago, bolty58 said:

Still processing what has occurred in Southport. My first instinct was something drug related from Liverpool. I wish it had have been.

At least we all agree it is fucking horrendous. The cunt should be strung up whoever he is.

I'll wait for confirmation of the attackers name. If it's Dyfedd from Cardiff or an unintended consequence of ECHR membership we need to be thinking about the kids and families right now before moving to the next stage.

Interesting that even the appeasers immediately think of Islamic terrorism even if their thought is concluded with "I hope it isn't". If it is, no doubt the pathetic and inaccurate 'you just don't like brown skin' defence will be front and centre yet again. That and "you can't tar them all with the same brush". The latter can be correct. It all depends on your definition of 'them'.

Think if the attacker is white British, we would have known by now, hope I'm wrong.