Site Supporter Tonge moor green jacket Posted January 15 Site Supporter Share Posted January 15 8 minutes ago, athywhite1958 said: Just read it about Forest and Everton, if these 2 get sanctioned (more for Everton) then what the fuck will happy to the Oil barons in Manchester Last I read was thar the city case will likely be heard around the end of this year, or possibly beginning of next. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators Zico Posted January 15 Moderators Share Posted January 15 8 minutes ago, DirtySanchez said: City are more complicated about hiding it so takes longer Forest and Everton have been stupid and made it obvious 11 minutes ago, athywhite1958 said: Just read it about Forest and Everton, if these 2 get sanctioned (more for Everton) then what the fuck will happy to the Oil barons in Manchester as I understand it Everton admitted it as well, or didn't hide it their beef is the penalty, they want to know what criteria was used to decide 10 points was the penalty the problem is, it was done by an independant panel, so it's not like they have a set of rules / guidelines as to how to come up with the penalty, they just decided 10 points was sufficient a different panel may look at forest, and even if identical circumstances, with no procedure, they could just as easily land on 8 or 12 points, or 10, or whatever likewise, City are also being investigated indepandantly they also fall under differnt regulations they could end up with 6 points for far greater breaches, in theory Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter Tonge moor green jacket Posted January 15 Site Supporter Share Posted January 15 I'm pretty sure they work to set of criteria that is the same for everyone. The independent aspect is to avoid any suggestion of a conflict of interest etc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members DirtySanchez Posted January 15 Members Share Posted January 15 2 minutes ago, Zico said: think Everton admitted it as well, or didn't hide it their beef is the penalty, they want to know what criteria was used to decide 10 points was the penalty the problem is, it was done by an independant panel, so it's not like they have a set of rules / guidelines as to how to come up with the penalty, they just decided 10 points was sufficient a different panel may look at forest, and even if identical circumstances, with no procedure, they could just as easily land on 8 or 12 points, or 10, or whatever likewise, City are also being investigated indepandantly they also fall under differnt regulations they could end up with 6 points for far greater breaches, in theory But isn't Everton's complaint that there's no precedent for a charge that high How many teams have been done for it in similar circumstances so there's no precedent There has to be a deterrent or teams will just think if the punishment is two or three points then they can claim that back with a win and take the risk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators Zico Posted January 15 Moderators Share Posted January 15 8 minutes ago, DirtySanchez said: But isn't Everton's complaint that there's no precedent for a charge that high How many teams have been done for it in similar circumstances so there's no precedent There has to be a deterrent or teams will just think if the punishment is two or three points then they can claim that back with a win and take the risk yes, basically, there will be never a predecent if every case is looked at by an indepandant body who aren't following a matrix or process of some sort Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members DirtySanchez Posted January 15 Members Share Posted January 15 1 minute ago, Zico said: yes, basically, there will be never a predecent if every case is looked at by an indepandant body who aren't following a matrix or process of some sort There would be if Everton got done They did whatever they did and for that they got points deducted Everything has to start from somewhere Let the independent body devise the matrix and work from there Otherwise who starts the starting position? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators Casino Posted January 15 Moderators Share Posted January 15 Can we not just relegate everton Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tomski Posted January 15 Share Posted January 15 Make it up as they go along. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators Zico Posted January 15 Moderators Share Posted January 15 5 minutes ago, DirtySanchez said: There would be if Everton got done They did whatever they did and for that they got points deducted Everything has to start from somewhere Let the independent body devise the matrix and work from there Otherwise who starts the starting position? the premier league should be the ones to devise it not sure why it's independant, seems to me the PL just want to palm it off elsewhere and not want any accountabilty but if one independant body uses something set up by another indepedant body, then it's not independant the premier league shoukd be the ones who need to devise those guidelines, imo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members DirtySanchez Posted January 15 Members Share Posted January 15 6 minutes ago, Zico said: the premier league should be the ones to devise it not sure why it's independant, seems to me the PL just want to palm it off elsewhere and not want any accountabilty but if one independant body uses something set up by another indepedant body, then it's not independant the premier league shoukd be the ones who need to devise those guidelines, imo A lot of investigations outside of footy get passed to independent bodies They'll be aware of the facts, the punishments etc Didn't an independent body clear us over points deduction over Brentford called off game and later Doncaster? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tomski Posted January 15 Share Posted January 15 Slightly different but good example I’d the punishments handed out to Toney and Tonali. I’d say the fact one can train and the other couldn’t is odd. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
L/H White Posted January 15 Share Posted January 15 hope they get this sorted, (from a Liverpool fan) #footballfamily Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Farrelli Posted January 15 Share Posted January 15 As usual the big boys seem to be judged with a different set of rules. It stinks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
batton carrier Posted January 15 Author Share Posted January 15 5 minutes ago, Farrelli said: As usual the big boys seem to be judged with a different set of rules. It stinks. But aren't Everton a massive club Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
radcliffe white Posted January 15 Share Posted January 15 Dock them another 10 probably still stay up as others are shite Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter Tonge moor green jacket Posted January 15 Site Supporter Share Posted January 15 2 hours ago, Zico said: the premier league should be the ones to devise it not sure why it's independant, seems to me the PL just want to palm it off elsewhere and not want any accountabilty but if one independant body uses something set up by another indepedant body, then it's not independant the premier league shoukd be the ones who need to devise those guidelines, imo The league will be using independent folk, so that there can be no accusations of a conflict of interest etc. You can understand that; it is the same when public inquiries are conducted by a judge. The relevant minister will initiate it, but it then goes to an independent assessor, who will make the decisions according to the law. An employment tribunal is a similar system used in disputes between employers and employees. This is essentially the same- I don't get your reasoning for your comments about accountability etc- by initiating the process, but then leaving the analysis to someone not connected to the club/league etc then any suggestions by either party of any conflicts are prevented. This process is something all clubs will be aware of, and will have to accept as part of being a league member. Some already believe there is an imbalance in the way as clubs are treated by the PL etc, imagine what that would be like if they carried out their own investigations and punishments. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MancWanderer Posted January 15 Share Posted January 15 Fuck all will happen against the Massives 93:20 Would destroy SKY’s hold on football Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members DazBob Posted January 15 Members Share Posted January 15 All these comparisons with Man City are tedious and boring. They're completely different cases. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pablo Posted January 15 Share Posted January 15 Give us aother 10 point deduction….best excitement we have had in years, fuck it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
athywhite1958 Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 10 hours ago, Pablo said: Give us aother 10 point deduction….best excitement we have had in years, fuck it. Then you would be bigger martyr's than the red shite Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators Zico Posted January 16 Moderators Share Posted January 16 12 hours ago, Tonge moor green jacket said: The league will be using independent folk, so that there can be no accusations of a conflict of interest etc. You can understand that; it is the same when public inquiries are conducted by a judge. The relevant minister will initiate it, but it then goes to an independent assessor, who will make the decisions according to the law. An employment tribunal is a similar system used in disputes between employers and employees. This is essentially the same- I don't get your reasoning for your comments about accountability etc- by initiating the process, but then leaving the analysis to someone not connected to the club/league etc then any suggestions by either party of any conflicts are prevented. This process is something all clubs will be aware of, and will have to accept as part of being a league member. Some already believe there is an imbalance in the way as clubs are treated by the PL etc, imagine what that would be like if they carried out their own investigations and punishments. Fair points but essentially for me I can see Everton's beef The PL need to get their shit together, independent bodies or otherwise No doubt there's plenty more breaches, charges and appeals to come and I'll bet there's no consistency in the approach and outcomes The Premier League does not have guidelines which prevent a club being sanctioned for alleged breaches in financial periods which have already been subject to punishment, unlike other governing bodies, including the EFL. As a result — and because of the Premier League’s new commitment to deal with such matters “in-season” — the club is in a position where it has had no option but to submit a PSR calculation which remains subject to change, pending the outcome of the appeal. “The club must now defend another Premier League complaint which includes the very same financial periods for which it has already been sanctioned, before that appeal has even been heard. The club takes the view that this results from a clear deficiency in the Premier League’s rules. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter Tonge moor green jacket Posted January 16 Site Supporter Share Posted January 16 What's a psr calculation? Doesn't seem like they've (PL) have helped themselves, though as @DirtySanchez says, this will become the precedent. It does seem odd though to be going ahead with another case before the appeal on the first has been heard, unless they're totally separate charges. Don't know enough about either case to comment on that specific point. I suppose they could get another (10 point) deduction, to make it 20. Then an appeal that reduces to first to say 5, and then maybe another appeal at some later date on the second case, which could also see a reduction. In other words the table could be all over the place, which will piss off clubs near to them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
L/H White Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 13 hours ago, Pablo said: Give us aother 10 point deduction….best excitement we have had in years, fuck it. they could put you on zero and you'd stop up, leagues dross Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Feelgood Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 1 hour ago, Tonge moor green jacket said: What's a psr calculation? Doesn't seem like they've (PL) have helped themselves, though as @DirtySanchez says, this will become the precedent. It does seem odd though to be going ahead with another case before the appeal on the first has been heard, unless they're totally separate charges. Don't know enough about either case to comment on that specific point. I suppose they could get another (10 point) deduction, to make it 20. Then an appeal that reduces to first to say 5, and then maybe another appeal at some later date on the second case, which could also see a reduction. In other words the table could be all over the place, which will piss off clubs near to them. By dragging their feet 2 or 3 years ago Everton managed to get a points deduction AFTER the season ended. So they have form oin foot-dragging manipulation. The EPL need to be aware of that and not allow lawyers to play these games again. It does seem they're trying to do that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pablo Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 2 hours ago, L/H White said: they could put you on zero and you'd stop up, leagues dross It is, and has been for years. Its only CIty that drag it to the "best in the world" everyone else is meh. City have been playing at 50% for 6 momths now, and are still only 1 win away from top.🤣 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.