Jump to content
Wanderers Ways. Neil Thompson 1961-2021

Recommended Posts

Posted

 

He described how, at the time of the transfer, he was only chairman of Wanderers part-time, earning £45,000 per year.

He is now full-time and has had his own desk at the Reebok for the last two years.

 

 

fucking hell

 

everyone was right

 

he was being paid way too much

 

ffs

  • Replies 53
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted (edited)

Club not happy with the BN

 

http://www.bwfc.co.uk/news/article/club-statement-23.4.14-1506612.aspx

 

Statement regarding an article published in The Bolton News on Wednesday 23 April
Bolton Wanderers Football Club wishes to express its disappointment and concern regarding an article published in The Bolton News on Wednesday 23 April in which it is alleged that the club paid a substantial fine to HMRC after wrongly reclaiming VAT.
 
This is categorically not the case as no fine was threatened or imposed on the club by HMRC. A payment was made pursuant to a commercial settlement reached with HMRC as the result of a football industry-wide enquiry into the tax treatment of agents' fees involving all Premier League clubs.
 
Our legal advisers have notified The Bolton News of the club's dissatisfaction with the misleading and inflammatory way in which this point has been reported. We note that The Bolton News has belatedly corrected its online publication of this story.
 
The club will be making no further comment at this time.

Read more at http://www.bwfc.co.uk/news/article/club-statement-23.4.14-1506612.aspx#hLlWl2u3u1oSuydu.99
Edited by Gonk
Posted

 

Club not happy with the BN

 

http://www.bwfc.co.uk/news/article/club-statement-23.4.14-1506612.aspx

 

Statement regarding an article published in The Bolton News on Wednesday 23 April
Bolton Wanderers Football Club wishes to express its disappointment and concern regarding an article published in The Bolton News on Wednesday 23 April in which it is alleged that the club paid a substantial fine to HMRC after wrongly reclaiming VAT.
 
This is categorically not the case as no fine was threatened or imposed on the club by HMRC. A payment was made pursuant to a commercial settlement reached with HMRC as the result of a football industry-wide enquiry into the tax treatment of agents' fees involving all Premier League clubs.
 
Our legal advisers have notified The Bolton News of the club's dissatisfaction with the misleading and inflammatory way in which this point has been reported. We note that The Bolton News has belatedly corrected its online publication of this story.
 
The club will be making no further comment at this time.

Read more at http://www.bwfc.co.uk/news/article/club-statement-23.4.14-1506612.aspx#hLlWl2u3u1oSuydu.99

 

 

 

get in

 

i'm waiting for the day they take seriously all the bullshit that gets posted on here about em being dodgy

 

we've made our position perfectly clear

 

in fact, it may be time to keep all that shit off here

Posted

get in

 

i'm waiting for the day they take seriously all the bullshit that gets posted on here about em being dodgy

 

we've made our position perfectly clear

 

in fact, it may be time to keep all that shit off here

Kinell Cas, the bullshit on here is like a big love in compared to what's goin on on the tangerines forum!

Posted

Kinell Cas, the bullshit on here is like a big love in compared to what's goin on on the tangerines forum!

I think what Cas was trying to get at is the keyboard warriors think they are safe behind a user name so spout whatever shit they want without any foundation, it may come as a shock to them but they are not

 

Posted

A further club statement has appeared, basically still demanding a "soz 'ard" from the BN.

 

Not that I can copy and paste it on here or anything like that, my computer is still not friendly with this forum

Posted (edited)

get in

 

i'm waiting for the day they take seriously all the bullshit that gets posted on here about em being dodgy

 

we've made our position perfectly clear

 

in fact, it may be time to keep all that shit off here

In the interests of fairness, had they not agreed commercially to settle, is it wrong to say a possibly outcome could have been a fine etc?

 

OJ wasn't guilty either you know...as proven by that jury

Edited by jules_darby

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.