Site Supporter Spider Posted May 10, 2023 Site Supporter Share Posted May 10, 2023 3 minutes ago, Tonge moor green jacket said: So, consistent, but not massive growth. Could be better, could be worse. Wouldn't envisage big growth anytime soon neither. Consistent? No. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
royal white Posted May 10, 2023 Share Posted May 10, 2023 On 09/05/2023 at 18:36, MalcolmW said: He still is a serving MP! He’s moving on up! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter Winchester White Posted May 10, 2023 Site Supporter Share Posted May 10, 2023 I know Brexit is often talked about as being the elephant in the room but for me extended austerity is the big fucking mammoth. Now we have both legacies still biting in addition to what everyone else is also dealing with regarding covid and Russia. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter Winchester White Posted May 10, 2023 Site Supporter Share Posted May 10, 2023 16 minutes ago, royal white said: He’s moving on up! What an absolute bellend Bridgen is. That Fox fella has totally lost the plot so they are a good fit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators Zico Posted May 10, 2023 Moderators Share Posted May 10, 2023 3 hours ago, Spider said: They could use 0 Then say 21% Odd that they didn’t, wouldn’t you say? aye, that's what I don't get about this graph it reminds me of Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MalcolmW Posted May 10, 2023 Share Posted May 10, 2023 3 hours ago, Spider said: They could use 0 Then say 21% Odd that they didn’t, wouldn’t you say? Begin with an index or measure at 100 and express future years as the growth (+/-) is applied. Thus growths of 5% followed by 10% give indices of 105 and 115.5 respectively. If the same growths appeared in reverse order the indices after 100 would be 110 and 115.5 respectively. If you begin with zero all future figures will be zero, so it was not your best ever suggestion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mounts Kipper Posted May 10, 2023 Share Posted May 10, 2023 1 hour ago, MalcolmW said: Begin with an index or measure at 100 and express future years as the growth (+/-) is applied. Thus growths of 5% followed by 10% give indices of 105 and 115.5 respectively. If the same growths appeared in reverse order the indices after 100 would be 110 and 115.5 respectively. If you begin with zero all future figures will be zero, so it was not your best ever suggestion. Where does the 0.5% come from? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobyBrno Posted May 10, 2023 Share Posted May 10, 2023 16 minutes ago, Mounts Kipper said: Where does the 0.5% come from? It’s 10% of the 105 from the 1st year of growth. So 1.15.5% Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jayjayoghani Posted May 10, 2023 Share Posted May 10, 2023 18 minutes ago, Mounts Kipper said: Where does the 0.5% come from? 10% of 105 added to 105 = 115.5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mounts Kipper Posted May 10, 2023 Share Posted May 10, 2023 25 minutes ago, BobyBrno said: It’s 10% of the 105 from the 1st year of growth. So 1.15.5% 24 minutes ago, jayjayoghani said: 10% of 105 added to 105 = 115.5 Thx. 👍 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter Spider Posted May 11, 2023 Site Supporter Share Posted May 11, 2023 10 hours ago, MalcolmW said: Begin with an index or measure at 100 and express future years as the growth (+/-) is applied. Thus growths of 5% followed by 10% give indices of 105 and 115.5 respectively. If the same growths appeared in reverse order the indices after 100 would be 110 and 115.5 respectively. If you begin with zero all future figures will be zero, so it was not your best ever suggestion. Cheers Malc. Makes sense now. I put each year in my response to flesh it out, mainly because that graph seems a little too specific. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
globaldiver Posted May 11, 2023 Share Posted May 11, 2023 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter Spider Posted May 11, 2023 Site Supporter Share Posted May 11, 2023 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter Spider Posted May 11, 2023 Site Supporter Share Posted May 11, 2023 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Farrelli Posted May 11, 2023 Share Posted May 11, 2023 Brexit delivery department 😂 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Traf Posted May 11, 2023 Share Posted May 11, 2023 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Traf Posted May 11, 2023 Share Posted May 11, 2023 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/uk-politics-65558694 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter Cheese Posted May 11, 2023 Site Supporter Share Posted May 11, 2023 15 minutes ago, Traf said: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/uk-politics-65558694 They don't give a single fuck about Parliamentary process. They think once they're elected, they can do whatever they want. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Farrelli Posted May 11, 2023 Share Posted May 11, 2023 1 hour ago, Cheese said: They don't give a single fuck about Parliamentary process. They think once they're elected, they can do whatever they want. Aye. That is why I hope Joris Bohnson gets the book thrown at him for continually misleading the house. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter Cheese Posted May 11, 2023 Site Supporter Share Posted May 11, 2023 3 minutes ago, Farrelli said: Aye. That is why I hope Joris Bohnson gets the book thrown at him for continually misleading the house. Can't ever read that without posting this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Farrelli Posted May 11, 2023 Share Posted May 11, 2023 20 minutes ago, Cheese said: Can't ever read that without posting this. Brilliant. He works in wishi washy’s brexit delivery department now😂 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mounts Kipper Posted May 11, 2023 Share Posted May 11, 2023 2 hours ago, Traf said: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/uk-politics-65558694 Good on Hoyle for pulling her up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter Tonge moor green jacket Posted May 11, 2023 Site Supporter Share Posted May 11, 2023 7 hours ago, Spider said: What do you reckon- take interest rate control back into government control, or leave with the Bank of England? Be interesting to put en equivalent one (for the same period) for interest rates. Certain economists have been explaining that this would happen for some considerable time, owing to too much quantitative easing, and slow response with interest rates too a rise in inflation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter Spider Posted May 11, 2023 Site Supporter Share Posted May 11, 2023 13 minutes ago, Tonge moor green jacket said: What do you reckon- take interest rate control back into government control, or leave with the Bank of England? Be interesting to put en equivalent one (for the same period) for interest rates. Certain economists have been explaining that this would happen for some considerable time, owing to too much quantitative easing, and slow response with interest rates too a rise in inflation. Why’ve you not asked Diver about his graphs? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobyBrno Posted May 11, 2023 Share Posted May 11, 2023 1 hour ago, Tonge moor green jacket said: What do you reckon- take interest rate control back into government control, or leave with the Bank of England? Be interesting to put en equivalent one (for the same period) for interest rates. Certain economists have been explaining that this would happen for some considerable time, owing to too much quantitative easing, and slow response with interest rates too a rise in inflation. I’ve been sharpening my crayons. Interest rates since 2007. No comparisons with other countries. Seems we had it good for most of the 13 years.👍 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.