Jump to content
Wanderers Ways. Neil Thompson 1961-2021

Rudy

Recommended Posts

20 minutes ago, Nowack said:

https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/datasets/deathsduetocovid19comparedwithdeathsfrominfluenzaandpneumonia

Below is an extract from table 5 showing annual deaths, on the left, and the ones on the right are flue season deaths. This also includes pneumonia by the way. 

2006 28,721 20,242
2007 28,317 19,195
2008 29,114 18,678
2009 26,683 18,290
2010 25,839 16,582
2011 25,868 17,581
2012 26,365 17,770
2013 26,625 18,984
2014 25,909 16,465
2015 29,451 21,157
2016 27,927 19,046
2017 27,858 18,725
2018 29,103 21,314
2019 25,406 17,432
2020 - 14,013

 

Fair enough, if that table is correct (which I’m sure it is) then it would appear that the widely reported figures of ‘50k excess deaths due to ineffective winter flu vaccine’ are massively overstated 

on another note, this paragraph from your link strikes me as really odd, If 17k usually die each year from flu then how on earth have we only had 394 so far this year? 

  • Of all death occurrences between January and August 2020, there were 48,168 deaths due to the coronavirus (COVID-19) compared with 13,619 deaths due to pneumonia and 394 deaths due to influenza.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, birch-chorley said:

The economic impact of 15m isolating for 6 months would be bad 

But nowhere near as bad as it was shutting large parts of the economy down for 4 months for all 66m of us. Clearly if 50m could have operated as normal and businesses remained open then the economic picture would have been a lot better 

We could have paid the 15m vulnerable people £1k a month through lockdown and it would still have been cheaper than the furlough scheme, that’s without even considering all the other government spending incurred (on top of the huge hit in tax revenue) 

With regards other countries, of course it gives pause for thought. To be fair I was supportive of lockdown / saving the NHS myself in March. With hindsight I believe it was the wrong way to go at it, now we can start to see the economic damage caused I think the cure is worse than the virus  

With that in mind, If it’s another 12 months for a vaccine I’d say we need to change our approach. If a vaccine is a matter of weeks away as has been suggested then of course we should carry on with plan A at this stage 

 

There are 11m over 65s in this country, 5.4m receiving treatment for asthma, 14m who are obese, plus cancer patients and others who immunocompromised. There will be overlapping, but all those people plus those who live with them = way more than 15m.

It seems to me that it's pretty obvious why no-one has tried what you're suggesting, it's practically and morally impossible. 

I'd also suggest that it's actually much, much easier to get 60m to stay indoors, than it is to get 20m to do it while everyone else cracks on.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/coronavirus-herd-immunity-sweden-covid-cases-anders-tegnell-b1421541.html

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, birch-chorley said:

50k excess deaths due to ineffective winter flu vaccine’ are massively overstated

Look at the exact wording, it's like saying "up to 100% effective." it could be 5% effective and the statement is still valid. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, birch-chorley said:

Come on, that stands out like a saw thumb, a 98% reduction in flu deaths? Masks and hand washing only really became a thing in March 

Seems ridiculous 

Like I said I've no idea. Maybe the actual statistics take time to correlate, maybe everyone is furloughed or working from home. Time will tell. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, birch-chorley said:

Come on, that stands out like a saw thumb, a 98% reduction in flu deaths? Masks and hand washing only really became a thing in March 

Seems ridiculous 

Of course it’s ridiculous and it’s why I always take out death numbers with a pinch of salt when folk start throwing comparables about like confetti 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Tombwfc said:

 

There are 11m over 65s in this country, 5.4m receiving treatment for asthma, 14m who are obese, plus cancer patients and others who immunocompromised. There will be overlapping, but all those people plus those who live with them = way more than 15m.

It seems to me that it's pretty obvious why no-one has tried what you're suggesting, it's practically and morally impossible. 

I'd also suggest that it's actually much, much easier to get 60m to stay indoors, than it is to get 20m to do it while everyone else cracks on.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/coronavirus-herd-immunity-sweden-covid-cases-anders-tegnell-b1421541.html

 

Somebody on LBC suggested that over 1/3 of the working population can be classed as "vulnerable" and there are 35M working people, so that's circa 12M. There are 12M pensioners  in the UK, so add them in, and we're already up to 24M, so that's a huge chunk the UK population we want to isolate for up to 6 months.

I guess a lot comes down to who decides what is actually classed as vulnerable, and how they get categorised. Some vulnerable people might not want to isolate, what do we do? - intern them?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Sweep said:

Somebody on LBC suggested that over 1/3 of the working population can be classed as "vulnerable" and there are 35M working people, so that's circa 12M. There are 12M pensioners  in the UK, so add them in, and we're already up to 24M, so that's a huge chunk the UK population we want to isolate for up to 6 months.

I guess a lot comes down to who decides what is actually classed as vulnerable, and how they get categorised. Some vulnerable people might not want to isolate, what do we do? - intern them?

Like any if it, your hoping the relevant people do as they are asked. Just like when you move one city into tier 3, your asking part of the U.K. population to adhere to different rules from another part of the population 

I’m not sure i quite agree that it’s easier to lockdown 66m (as we did in spring) as it is to lockdown 15m 

Its certainly not easier on the economy 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Mounts Kipper said:

 You can’t live your life isolating repeatedly for 2 weeks whenever you get the message. 

 I read somewhere that in most cases the incubation time was 5 days, now if the government tested you on the 5th day they’d have a much better chance of folk isolating, as it stands you are not supposed to get tested unless you have symptoms, therefore it has to be 14 days.  Most folk want to do the right thing but currently it’s not encouraging folk to do that.

Absolutely. To ask folk to isolate without testing is bollox.

My nipper is currently on her second isolation since starting back at school. It's bullshit without a test

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tonge moor green jacket said:

They are only 'useless' if you dont come down with it. But thats the whole point of it, you're potentially infectious before you become ill, so isolating protects others.

By that same token a test undertaken too early may give false assurance.

Until these new machines are rolled out (with supposed higher accuracy) then were stuck with current methods.

These machines ain't coming. It's part of Boris's Blustering Bullshit Bingo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have been working from home since the end of March, I have made the odd trip to the supermarket, I go to the garage every day for a paper and i have been to football 3 times, oh and I went on Colls Saturday for a couple of hours, other than that I have been stuck at home, each time I left the house I made sure I had a face covering handy and stayed away from people as much as I could, so if anybody thinks I am going to isolate for (another) 6 months and not venture out at all they can fuck off, 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, athywhite1958 said:

I have been working from home since the end of March, I have made the odd trip to the supermarket, I go to the garage every day for a paper and i have been to football 3 times, oh and I went on Colls Saturday for a couple of hours, other than that I have been stuck at home, each time I left the house I made sure I had a face covering handy and stayed away from people as much as I could, so if anybody thinks I am going to isolate for (another) 6 months and not venture out at all they can fuck off, 

I think most people are feeling the fatigue of the restrictions I think most of the population will adhere to the next 4 weeks lockdown much more beyond that and I think many more millions will be telling the government to ‘fuck off’ as you say 

Better hope that the vaccine comes soon or  it may well be taken out of the governments hands 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Site Supporter
2 hours ago, birch-chorley said:

If the predominant reason given for excess deaths was ‘an ineffective flu vaccine’ then I’d assume they died of flu. Might have been pneumonia as a result of flu perhaps 

Thats certainly what happened to my wife’s nan that Winter 

Predominant yes, but surely not all.

Asthma sufferers often suffer more in winter for example. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.