Jump to content
Wanderers Ways. Neil Thompson 1961-2021

Transfer Gossip


Ratwhite

Recommended Posts

26 minutes ago, Mounts Kipper said:

Interesting to hear Kens comments on ED reason for getting out of the club was because of the abuse he received from some fans.

Its sad that he felt that way after the money he’d pumped in and the success we had under his ownership. 

There was plenty on here having a pop at Eddie when he was stopping his funding. I'm not having it that it was the reason he wanted out though. 

He couldn't keep chucking money into the abyss especially as he was getting on in age. 

Davies and Gartside couldn't shift the club and now Ken is having the same problems. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doidge isnt up to championship footie

People up in arms over not signing a striker thats scored 1 in 15 or something

If Ken had paid a mill outright he would have taken pelters for that and letting Le Fondre go, he cant win

I think if we wiggled out of that deal then Kens a legend

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Bigtoe said:

he can stay at FGR for me, hes shite

He's played for us and FGR this season, so can't play for any other team until next season - is the point Casino is making.

KA is obliged I think to offer Vince the initial £250,000 agreed to cover his backside just in case Vince does try to sue the club.

KA can then say they renegotiated the signing on date from the original 3rd Jan to the 16th (when the EFL money came in) and honoured this amendment with Norwich in respect of Mathews and had every intention of doing so with FGR too - so the sale was broken by Vince reneging on the amended deal and no KA as Vince is claiming.

Up to Vince therefore to prove otherwise as he is on record as saying he agreed a change in payment date (but he claims it was only until the next day).  KA can easily prove he couldn't possibly have made payment on the 4th January - but could (and probably did go on to make the offer) on the 16th.

It then becomes interesting what happens next.  Vince knows he won't get the same money again for Doidge after his 1 in 17 spell with us.  He knows he won't be able to sell him this window - so was a guaranteed £250,000 and seemingly two more quarter of a million instalments to follow be beneficial to FGR finances this season and next?

Add to that Doidge clearly wanted to leave the club behind Vince's back and that we have supposedly increased his pay significantly - does he really want to go back to much reduced wages at FGR and play for a club he clearly wanted away from?

I don't think this story has run its course just yet but it would mean Vince swallowing his words if Doidge ended back with us and I can't somehow see him doing that - maybe that's what KA is banking on too!

If you like a bit of a conspiracy theory how about this -

Initially it was reported that Vince was happy to wait for payment from BWFC and Doidge wasn't hooked back to FGR until a few days after payment was due - payment due on the 3rd Doidge told to return on the 6th) on the 7th Vince went public with his rant about KA - and also added on the 8th that they will be selling No Ken Do with all monies going to OUR ST!!!

How random is that?

Almost as though someone contacted Vince after he said he was relaxed about being paid, made him severely doubt he ever would (thus changing his mind and recalling Doidge back there and then) and he in return did a public  'gesture' of goodwill towards them to thank them for their insight into the running of our club and their view of the owner?

Just that I can't think of who would possibly do such a thing, or have anything to possibly gain by it though?

Can you?

Wonder if Iles will be running a story on the ST's jolly day out to see FGR v Bury?

Maybe they can all pose for a selfie wearing their No Ken Do T-shirts?

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 19/01/2019 at 00:08, Sluffy said:

He's played for us and FGR this season, so can't play for any other team until next season - is the point Casino is making.

KA is obliged I think to offer Vince the initial £250,000 agreed to cover his backside just in case Vince does try to sue the club.

KA can then say they renegotiated the signing on date from the original 3rd Jan to the 16th (when the EFL money came in) and honoured this amendment with Norwich in respect of Mathews and had every intention of doing so with FGR too - so the sale was broken by Vince reneging on the amended deal and no KA as Vince is claiming.

Up to Vince therefore to prove otherwise as he is on record as saying he agreed a change in payment date (but he claims it was only until the next day).  KA can easily prove he couldn't possibly have made payment on the 4th January - but could (and probably did go on to make the offer) on the 16th.

It then becomes interesting what happens next.  Vince knows he won't get the same money again for Doidge after his 1 in 17 spell with us.  He knows he won't be able to sell him this window - so was a guaranteed £250,000 and seemingly two more quarter of a million instalments to follow be beneficial to FGR finances this season and next?

Add to that Doidge clearly wanted to leave the club behind Vince's back and that we have supposedly increased his pay significantly - does he really want to go back to much reduced wages at FGR and play for a club he clearly wanted away from?

I don't think this story has run its course just yet but it would mean Vince swallowing his words if Doidge ended back with us and I can't somehow see him doing that - maybe that's what KA is banking on too!

If you like a bit of a conspiracy theory how about this -

Initially it was reported that Vince was happy to wait for payment from BWFC and Doidge wasn't hooked back to FGR until a few days after payment was due - payment due on the 3rd Doidge told to return on the 6th) on the 7th Vince went public with his rant about KA - and also added on the 8th that they will be selling No Ken Do with all monies going to OUR ST!!!

How random is that?

Almost as though someone contacted Vince after he said he was relaxed about being paid, made him severely doubt he ever would (thus changing his mind and recalling Doidge back there and then) and he in return did a public  'gesture' of goodwill towards them to thank them for their insight into the running of our club and their view of the owner?

Just that I can't think of who would possibly do such a thing, or have anything to possibly gain by it though?

Can you?

Wonder if Iles will be running a story on the ST's jolly day out to see FGR v Bury?

Maybe they can all pose for a selfie wearing their No Ken Do T-shirts?

 

 

 

 

You are now in full blown tin foil hat territory. Making up things to further your personal crusade against the trust and in particular certain trust member that you know and I know you’ve had serious issues with.  You need another hobby or even better, get a life you sad sad person. 

Edited by Mounts Kipper
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators
44 minutes ago, Mounts Kipper said:

You are now in full blown tin foil hat territory. Making up things to further your personal crusade against the trust and in particular certain trust member that you know and I know you’ve had serious issues with.  You need another hobby or even better, get a life you sad sad person. 

i wouldnt put anything past Lies and the trust

still nothing from him on the investigation into a co-opted member of the trust board

hes a disgrace

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Casino said:

i wouldnt put anything past Lies and the trust

still nothing from him on the investigation into a co-opted member of the trust board

hes a disgrace

I’m not defending Iles but the fact that sluffy without absolutely any evidence comes to the conclusion that the trust have possibly colluded against BWFC and actively engineered us losing a player is in my opinion reprehensible and all because sluffy had a spat with a trust board member.  

Edited by Mounts Kipper
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Mounts Kipper said:

I’m not defending Iles but the fact that sluffy without absolutely any evidence comes to the conclusion that the trust have possibly colluded against BWFC and actively engineered us losing a player is in my opinion reprehensible and all because sluffy had a spat with a trust board member.  

If Iles, the trust, McGinlay, Dearden et al are allowed to jump to conclusions, why shouldn't Sluffy?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators
12 minutes ago, Traf said:

If Iles, the trust, McGinlay, Dearden et al are allowed to jump to conclusions, why shouldn't Sluffy?

because he has said previoulsy, many times, that he hasn't got an axe to grind and doesn't jump to conclusions without proof

he's pro KA and anti ST - which is perfectly fine - but it keeps trying to deny it for some reason

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators
2 minutes ago, passmosster said:

The Trust has committed more than 2 wrongs in my eye. A major disappointment as I used to be a member. They're just not worth commenting on any more.

apparently iles is running a piece on the investigation into the co-opted board member later this week

you can only ask yourself why hes delaying it until after tonight

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quite impressive to ring a businessman at random, get him to do himself out of £1m and give you some money instead. Especially given there was no way of them knowing the status of the Doidge deal at that point.

Probably used the same Jedi mind skills as Deano did when he got Ken to pay the £1m he pocketed from the BluMarble loan and then get him to promise never to mention it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, bwfc2003 said:
 Marc Iles and 3 others liked

Delighted to have completed my permanent move to @OfficialBWFC - one which I chose in the summer with my future in mind - and I'm now looking forward to the rest of the season, thanks to everyone for the kind messages #BWFC ⚽️

Can’t be that bad for the players if he’s still signed 

He’d run a mile if it was surely 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Mounts Kipper said:

I’m not defending Iles but the fact that sluffy without absolutely any evidence comes to the conclusion that the trust have possibly colluded against BWFC and actively engineered us losing a player is in my opinion reprehensible and all because sluffy had a spat with a trust board member.  

Eh???

Where did I come to any conclusion at all? 

If you read it again I said if you liked 'conspiracy theory's' - you know like - did the USA really land on the moon, or are their extra-terrestrial aliens at Area 51, or who shot JFK.

(I do though find it extremely random why the owner of FGR should thank the ST by way of raising funds for it, from the start of the public rift between the two chairmen?)

And for the record for about the millionth time - I've no 'spat' with a ST member - but he clearly took an internet forum disagreement and transferred that into real life by spending his own real money to buy a similarly name domain site to our Bolton Nuts one when we first started in an attempt to stop people finding us - and redirecting it to a gay porn site!

I'm not the one with the anger management issues mate.

I have had issues as to how the ST, as a public body, as undertaken its business though and I've simply pointed out a number of times what are clearly failings of it and its board.  As a for instance in holding its mandatory AGM in the second of only its three years of existence so far!  If you are happy that the ST is somehow untouchable from factual criticism from me, then that's up to you, but it doesn't make it any less true.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators
12 minutes ago, Sluffy said:

Eh???

Where did I come to any conclusion at all? 

If you read it again I said if you liked 'conspiracy theory's' - you know like - did the USA really land on the moon, or are their extra-terrestrial aliens at Area 51, or who shot JFK.

(I do though find it extremely random why the owner of FGR should thank the ST by way of raising funds for it, from the start of the public rift between the two chairmen?)

And for the record for about the millionth time - I've no 'spat' with a ST member - but he clearly took an internet forum disagreement and transferred that into real life by spending his own real money to buy a similarly name domain site to our Bolton Nuts one when we first started in an attempt to stop people finding us - and redirecting it to a gay porn site!

I'm not the one with the anger management issues mate.

I have had issues as to how the ST, as a public body, as undertaken its business though and I've simply pointed out a number of times what are clearly failings of it and its board.  As a for instance in holding its mandatory AGM in the second of only its three years of existence so far!  If you are happy that the ST is somehow untouchable from factual criticism from me, then that's up to you, but it doesn't make it any less true.

 

boltonnutsinguts.com?

wonder if it's the same person who set up wanderersgays.com

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.