Moderators Carlos Posted September 26, 2017 Moderators Share Posted September 26, 2017 Looks like a Natasha like fucking loon. Block them and move on. Twitter has enough fake women and absolute loons. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deane koontz Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 Eavies is on talkshite now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter victor meldrew Posted September 26, 2017 Site Supporter Share Posted September 26, 2017 Eavies is on talkshite now[/quote What was said Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deane koontz Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 Meh, not much really. He was only on for a brief moment. It was difficult to get beyond Jim's White's brown nosing and buddy tones. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZiggyStardust Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 Not sure if this has already been covered Mike, why did you say you wasnt going to be a board member, then ended up a board member? Didn’t he say that they didn’t have enough candidates to fill the roles so some had to go back in the positions or the trust would collapse? Indeed he did, on behalf of both himself & Ian. Their board application forms are online *, Ian's is dated 10 days before the closing date of applications ** , and whilst Mike's isn't dated it includes the statement it reads as if this something that he is not exactly reluctant to do. * http://www.bwfcst.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/BWST-Candidate-Statements-July-16.pdf ** In the interests of fairness, the three dated applications are dated after this date. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kane57 Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 Meh, not much really. He was only on for a brief moment. It was difficult to get beyond Jim's White's brown nosing and buddy tones. Read Iles' review - thought it was quite interesting Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tomski Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 I had to laugh when Eddie suggested/blamed Ken/Dean for the embargo, nought to do with him obviously or even a slice of blame Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jturner Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 I had to laugh when Eddie suggested/blamed Ken/Dean for the embargo, nought to do with him obviously or even a slice of blame Did Eddie say why he blamed Ken for the embargo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tomski Posted September 27, 2017 Share Posted September 27, 2017 Did Eddie say why he blamed Ken for the embargoIt was the situation, in taking so long to sort holdsworths mob out that I think it was blamed on Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bwfcfan5 Posted September 27, 2017 Share Posted September 27, 2017 I had to laugh when Eddie suggested/blamed Ken/Dean for the embargo, nought to do with him obviously or even a slice of blame Did he remind everyone that he sold the club to Ken and Dean. Or was that conveniently airbrushed out? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gonzo Posted September 27, 2017 Share Posted September 27, 2017 Did he remind everyone that he sold the club to Ken and Dean. Or was that conveniently airbrushed out? He didn't mention his tax bill either Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Traf Posted September 27, 2017 Share Posted September 27, 2017 He's a cunt. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZiggyStardust Posted October 1, 2017 Share Posted October 1, 2017 For reference, a week later and the SSL certificate is still unrenewed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter MickyD Posted October 1, 2017 Site Supporter Share Posted October 1, 2017 He's a cunt. They're all cunts Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gonzo Posted October 3, 2017 Share Posted October 3, 2017 https://supporters-direct.org/articles/supporters-direct-statement-bolton-wanderers Supporters direct involved now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZiggyStardust Posted October 3, 2017 Share Posted October 3, 2017 certificate is 52 days overdue. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Traf Posted October 3, 2017 Share Posted October 3, 2017 https://supporters-direct.org/articles/supporters-direct-statement-bolton-wanderers Supporters direct involved now. They can cunt off too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators Casino Posted October 3, 2017 Author Moderators Share Posted October 3, 2017 https://supporters-direct.org/articles/supporters-direct-statement-bolton-wanderers Supporters direct involved now. well, thats going to help Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators Casino Posted October 3, 2017 Author Moderators Share Posted October 3, 2017 (edited) did deloittes resign or did we go for the cheaper option? i know they felt unable to sign off the going concern bit of the accounts, but didnt remember them jacking us in and seeing as we are still here, does that mean they were overly cautious? or that KA is some sort of miracle worker Edited October 3, 2017 by Casino Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mounts Kipper Posted October 3, 2017 Share Posted October 3, 2017 Any one who thinks the club would be in a safer position by removing the AVC is a mentalist. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tomski Posted October 3, 2017 Share Posted October 3, 2017 Any one who thinks the club would be in a safer position by removing the AVC is a mentalist.Until I hear what they want to do I'd have to agree Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mounts Kipper Posted October 3, 2017 Share Posted October 3, 2017 Until I hear what they want to do I'd have to agree K.A. been asked that question and wont answer it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members DirtySanchez Posted October 3, 2017 Members Share Posted October 3, 2017 Any one who thinks the club would be in a safer position by removing the AVC is a mentalist.Its an ACV ????But bar the local pub they aren't worth the paper they are written on Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gonzo Posted October 3, 2017 Share Posted October 3, 2017 Any one who thinks the club would be in a safer position by removing the AVC is a mentalist. It won't stop the sale of the ground. Not that I think that's on the agenda anyway like. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators Casino Posted October 3, 2017 Author Moderators Share Posted October 3, 2017 Any one who thinks the club would be in a safer position by removing the AVC is a mentalist. like ive said many times before, despite the trust lies, the ACV does not prevent a sale of the ground Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.