Jump to content
Wanderers Ways. Neil Thompson 1961-2021

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, ZicoKelly said:

neither has continually moaning about crowds in his column

I would say, his best bet, would be to reduce a game that is likely to attract a bigger crowd

not Bristol City on a Friday night, or Brentford who bring less than 500 fans

reduce it to £10 or £15 for Wigan at home on December 1st, and hope we put in a performance that generates an atmosphere and that we get a good result

 

Seems obvious Doesn't it. It won't happen

Posted
12 minutes ago, bwfcfan5 said:

I suspect Ken feels that getting consistent 20K crowds makes the club more attractive to buyers, rather than the gate income being sufficient to propel us alone.

But equally the extra income from those tickets might bring in one or two better players in the meantime. 

Having an owner who could buy a couple of players would make us more attractive too. Or an owner that pays people on time. Not happening though. Nor is his 20k waffle. He/we should move on to making it better for those of us that do go!

Posted
1 hour ago, ZicoKelly said:

I don't think it's chicken and egg at all

crowds go up when the team is doing well and there is "something to play for", they go down when it's not, or just stumbling along as we are now

that's not a call for investment or demand that we compete for promotion, it's just the way it is

bigger, rising crowds have never come before on the field success (certainly not in my time), they come as a result of it

that's the realism, it just seems like KA feels hard done by that all his hard work in stabilizing the club is not being rewarded with bigger crowds

unfortunately for him, financial stability is not the catalyst for floating fans and part timers to come 

Well said. The same for other clubs too. 

Posted
2 hours ago, bwfcfan5 said:

I think Ken's point is that it is chicken and egg. If Bolton want to compete with clubs in this league they need more fans prepared to pay decent ticket prices. Our average attendance last season was 17th in the division. Yet our fans seem to think we should be competing top end of the league.

I think some realism or some more prepared to dip into their pockets is required.

We had years and years being sheltered from reality thanks to Eddie's millions. 

I doubt there's a single person who honestly believes we should be competing at the top end of the league.

Our attendance last year, as zico pointed out, was a reflection of what went on on the pitch.

That's simply how it is. Ken's pointed out previously about the importance of living within our means which I would agree with.

Therefore our means will need to reflect the crowd size. No point him bleating about it, unless a miraculous new investor is found.

Gradual improvement in squad and results is happening, even though the stuff on offer isn't great. So long as that continues and the club grows, albeit slowly then that's all he can really expect.

Most fans will accept that as it seems an honest way of doing things.

Posted
2 hours ago, ZicoKelly said:

aye, was thinking that

festive bonanza - 4 games for £80 (that being the top end price for west/east upper), even let people pay in installments if they have to

milk the fuck out of it throughout October and November

I know this won't happen though

it'll probably be the midweek Forest game when STs can being a mate for £10 or £15, but everyone will watch it on the red button and there will be 12k on, then it'll be further proof that reducing ticket prices doesn't work

I think anyone who is able to commit to four games within such a relatively limited period of time is already likely to be a season ticket holder. Any two of the four games for something as little as £30 could work, but it still needs a certain amount of buy-in from the fans. 

Posted
44 minutes ago, gonzo said:

Seriously though what a day for Marc Iles to publish the story. On the day of the fucking funeral ffs

I suspect that will be the key point dwelt upon when KA publishes his column to explain the situation

Posted
45 minutes ago, gonzo said:

Seriously though what a day for Marc Iles to publish the story. On the day of the fucking funeral ffs

I know, it could have waited 24 hours couldn't it.

I'm sure Iles is trying to get himself banned from the ground

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Sweep said:

I know, it could have waited 24 hours couldn't it.

I'm sure Iles is trying to get himself banned from the ground

I think folk need a scapegoat and are picking iles or are blinded by ken.

This latest stuff certainly looks suspect. Happy to stand corrected if we hear anything else on it.

Edited by tomski
Posted
10 minutes ago, tomski said:

I think folk need a scapegoat and are picking iles or are blinded by ken.

 

possibly, I was talking about the timing though, it's a bit classless to release the story on the day of the funeral, in my opinion

 

For what it's worth, I think Iles is a dick, and I wouldn't trust KA any further than I could throw him. We'll be able to properly judge Kenneth once he leaves, let's hope he leaves with a large wedge in his pocket as a result of a sale to some Billionaire.......as opposed to him leaving with a large wedge in his pocket and us in administration/insolvency

Posted

Out of interest

It seems so long as we clear the outstanding amount before the case is heard, these orders go away

I'm guessing we must incur costs?

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.