Jump to content
Wanderers Ways. Neil Thompson 1961-2021

Recommended Posts

Posted

If it’s true about FV needing to join forces with another group to complete is this a good thing or bad thing? 

Bad in the respect they obviously don’t have the cash originally, but good in the respect there’d now potentially be someone on board who does? 

Not sure myself. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Mantra said:

We’re definitely reaching page 800 before this is done and dusted

Page 1,000 more like 

Posted

Anyone can create a twitter account and spout some rubbish until someone picks up on it and all of a sudden it's believable. 

We've been told heads of terms were signed. BEN said just this morning we could get news in a couple of days. I don't get why people out there such as Nixon insist on fuelling a conspiracy theory. Unless FV walk away there's nothing to worry about yet. Speclation is what Nixon wants. It keeps people coming back. He's not there to just help Bolton fans know what's going on for the goodness of his heart. 

I mean FV had to have their funding ratified. If the "investor" just pulled the plug, I'm pretty sure we would have known something. That doesn't just slip under the radar when we are in administration. 

Posted

My understanding is Basran wasn't money, basran was a broker

Dunno why shazza would be in Costa with PP if it wasn't happening

Posted
2 minutes ago, Matthew1234 said:

Anyone can create a twitter account and spout some rubbish until someone picks up on it and all of a sudden it's believable. 

We've been told heads of terms were signed. BEN said just this morning we could get news in a couple of days. I don't get why people out there such as Nixon insist on fuelling a conspiracy theory. Unless FV walk away there's nothing to worry about yet. Speclation is what Nixon wants. It keeps people coming back. He's not there to just help Bolton fans know what's going on for the goodness of his heart. 

I mean FV had to have their funding ratified. If the "investor" just pulled the plug, I'm pretty sure we would have known something. That doesn't just slip under the radar when we are in administration. 

My thoughts exactly. Not sure what Ash has to gain from making it up though. A few followers maybe but doesn’t seem worth it. Trying to derail the FV bid seems unlikely. Who knows?

Posted
5 minutes ago, Casino said:

My understanding is Basran wasn't money, basran was a broker

Dunno why shazza would be in Costa with PP if it wasn't happening

She was probably asking Phil if he had any spare cash in his piggy bank 

Posted
6 minutes ago, Mantra said:

My thoughts exactly. Not sure what Ash has to gain from making it up though. A few followers maybe but doesn’t seem worth it. Trying to derail the FV bid seems unlikely. Who knows?

Maybe he is a mate of Nixons - he "talks" like him - 2/3 word answers - not vsure for what purpose though

Posted
2 minutes ago, Mantra said:

My thoughts exactly. Not sure what Ash has to gain from making it up though. A few followers maybe but doesn’t seem worth it. Trying to derail the FV bid seems unlikely. Who knows?

This Ash also claimed on the 11th April that a takeover was "closer than we thought". I am filing it swiftly under the category of someone sat behind a keyboard trying to act "in the know". Even if they are a genuine person, for all we know it could be someone with intentions akin to Howard; to stir doubts with the bid in order to create further uncertainty. 

How many times have we heard the lines "local party interested". It simply is not true. 

As much as the Bolton News have got a few things wrong in their time, I really do not believe Marc Iles would write that story today without genuine insider knowledge. Looking forward to just getting back to talking about football, and signings. 

Posted

Maybe FV have proved to the administrators that they have the funds needed to buy the club but need additional partners on board to fund a bid for the hotel?

Posted

Fuck me there is some nonsense on twitter. If FV haven’t proven they have the money and the admins have lied then Bassini will make hay in court. Can’t believe people get sucked in so easily. ‘Big meeting tomorrow, can’t say more under NDA’.

If you’re under NDA then you can’t say anything you tit. If you haven’t signed one or don’t work for someone who has signed one on your behalf then stop talking shite...

Posted

this is his latest

 

More
Replying to @MarcusMyrie

Tweeted to handful before tweeting about lfc. Created this account mainly for this issue. Lifelong lfc fan so couldnt help it...you know just a small matter of big ears and all that 😜

Posted (edited)
33 minutes ago, Casino said:

It's never done owt else so far as I know

this is incorrect.

its the only part of the "club" that has made an annual profit more often than not.

although i have no doubt that some creative accounting was in place to hide the profits.

Edited by HomerJay
Posted

Afew days ago on here I said something along the lines of FV might be a vehicle for a high net worth individual to purchase the club. There's then a story about a delay and these get combined into a new thing. About FV having a new source of income causing the delay. 

I think these guys just read what we're saying on here reword it and post it as news or gossip a couple of days later, which then gets reposted which then makes a loop.

 

 

Posted

Hearing there is a major problem with the deal. Big meeting Wednesday. That will determine if deal goes ahead or not. Might not complete this week. But it might. Or might never. Can’t say more. Under NDA.....

Posted
3 minutes ago, bwfcfan5 said:

Hearing there is a major problem with the deal. Big meeting Wednesday. That will determine if deal goes ahead or not. Might not complete this week. But it might. Or might never. Can’t say more. Under NDA.....

Sarcasm right?

Posted
9 minutes ago, bwfcfan5 said:

Hearing there is a major problem with the deal. Big meeting Wednesday. That will determine if deal goes ahead or not. Might not complete this week. But it might. Or might never. Can’t say more. Under NDA.....

You ain't seen me......  right ?   

Posted
8 hours ago, fatolive said:

 

 

8 hours ago, bwfcfan5 said:

Hearing there is a major problem with the deal. Big meeting Wednesday. That will determine if deal goes ahead or not. Might not complete this week. But it might. Or might never. Can’t say more. Under NDA.....

🤣

Posted

This is such a pisstake now. You'd think that the official announcements at least could be relied upon, especially those from the EFL who have been actively involved since they had to lend Anderson money to keep us going and you'd have expected them to have done the due diligence when approving the evidence of investor funds etc and yet there's one spanner in the works after another. Somebody is playing silly buggers. I'd rather see it done properly than done quick but it's almost as if there's a conspiracy to finish off the club and it seems they're doing a pretty good job of it.

Posted
23 minutes ago, Hoppy510 said:

This is such a pisstake now. You'd think that the official announcements at least could be relied upon, especially those from the EFL who have been actively involved since they had to lend Anderson money to keep us going and you'd have expected them to have done the due diligence when approving the evidence of investor funds etc and yet there's one spanner in the works after another. Somebody is playing silly buggers. I'd rather see it done properly than done quick but it's almost as if there's a conspiracy to finish off the club and it seems they're doing a pretty good job of it.

Have to admit the whole thing is just starting to leave me a little uneasy. Was expecting it to be done early this week after Sharon met with Parky last week. That to me was a signal it was done. But there is no sign thus far....got to be a mild concern as to which frees will be left for us....

 

Posted
50 minutes ago, Hoppy510 said:

This is such a pisstake now. You'd think that the official announcements at least could be relied upon, especially those from the EFL who have been actively involved since they had to lend Anderson money to keep us going and you'd have expected them to have done the due diligence when approving the evidence of investor funds etc and yet there's one spanner in the works after another. Somebody is playing silly buggers. I'd rather see it done properly than done quick but it's almost as if there's a conspiracy to finish off the club and it seems they're doing a pretty good job of it.

Who is "they"?

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.