kent_white Posted May 17, 2022 Share Posted May 17, 2022 6 hours ago, Tonge moor green jacket said: Assuming the level of homo-sexuality is broadly the same across races/colours etc, then racial make up would make no difference to the number in football. Still intrigued as to why the levels in elite sportsmen wouldn't reflect that of society at large. Is there a link between batting for the same side and not being able to run very fast? My point is - maybe homosexual men are disuaded from pursuing a career in football. Which is why there's less of them than you would imagine - if you were just extrapolating from the population at large? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Breightmet Boy Posted May 17, 2022 Share Posted May 17, 2022 Bruce Gobbler Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members DazBob Posted May 17, 2022 Members Share Posted May 17, 2022 Peter Shirtlifter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter Tonge moor green jacket Posted May 17, 2022 Site Supporter Share Posted May 17, 2022 1 hour ago, kent_white said: My point is - maybe homosexual men are disuaded from pursuing a career in football. Which is why there's less of them than you would imagine - if you were just extrapolating from the population at large? Perhaps. But we simply don't know. Not sure the hackneyed "they're effeminate puffters and don't like physical stuff" is or ever has been valid. As I asked RW, if there are genuine reasons- biological/social etc that have been shown, I'd be genuinely interested. It might then help explain the numbers (or lack of). It's a similar thing within the armed forces- not long ago it was illegal- bit I'd be surprised if levels here were significantly lower than the population in general. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gonzo Posted May 17, 2022 Share Posted May 17, 2022 Ricardo Up hill Gardner Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gonzo Posted May 17, 2022 Share Posted May 17, 2022 Uncle Brian McLair Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
radcliffe white Posted May 17, 2022 Share Posted May 17, 2022 Lars bender Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter Tonge moor green jacket Posted May 17, 2022 Site Supporter Share Posted May 17, 2022 6 hours ago, royal white said: Ok, using all the figures we have roughly how many gays do you think are playing elite football in England? Like kent said you can’t really take a countries demographics and apply it to football. With some of the examples being thrown about it’s like saying 7.5% of Britain is Asian therefore 7.5% of WW posters are Asian. We all know that ain’t true. 1. Without any reasons to the contrary, the same proportion. 2. The two aren't comparable. As already detailed, doesn't matter what proportion of ww members are Asian, white or black etc. If the proportion of gay folk in the groups is similar (again nothing to say that wouldn't be the case) then the number of members that are gay would reflect that of society. It really is simple mathematics. Throw in some proven facts to skew to maths one way or another then fine. Until that's done, then simply stating that demographics can't be applied is meaningless as it has no foundation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gonzo Posted May 17, 2022 Share Posted May 17, 2022 Steve Faggot Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter Steejay Posted May 17, 2022 Site Supporter Share Posted May 17, 2022 GayGay Okocha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
radcliffe white Posted May 17, 2022 Share Posted May 17, 2022 Ars bandeet Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
royal white Posted May 17, 2022 Share Posted May 17, 2022 12 minutes ago, Tonge moor green jacket said: 1. Without any reasons to the contrary, the same proportion. 2. The two aren't comparable. As already detailed, doesn't matter what proportion of ww members are Asian, white or black etc. If the proportion of gay folk in the groups is similar (again nothing to say that wouldn't be the case) then the number of members that are gay would reflect that of society. It really is simple mathematics. Throw in some proven facts to skew to maths one way or another then fine. Until that's done, then simply stating that demographics can't be applied is meaningless as it has no foundation. So using your simple mathematics you would have to say women footballers come under the same figures. I can 100% assure you they don’t . So that 1 example proves that the X amount of the population is gay so the same percent of footballers are gay is totally false. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
royal white Posted May 17, 2022 Share Posted May 17, 2022 18 minutes ago, radcliffe white said: Ars bandeet David batty boy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter Steejay Posted May 17, 2022 Site Supporter Share Posted May 17, 2022 Nicky Buttfucker Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Feelgood Posted May 17, 2022 Share Posted May 17, 2022 29 minutes ago, royal white said: So that 1 example proves that the X amount of the population is gay so the same percent of footballers are gay is totally false. To be fair, including the wimmin would increase the proportions hugely. The wimminz teams are 30-40% munchers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Breightmet Boy Posted May 18, 2022 Share Posted May 18, 2022 Bukkakeith Brannigan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Breightmet Boy Posted May 18, 2022 Share Posted May 18, 2022 Spunk-on Ferguson… Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
embankment Posted May 18, 2022 Share Posted May 18, 2022 On 16/05/2022 at 17:18, anewman said: Don’t mind a jd and Coke occasionally It's a Lemmy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter Spider Posted May 18, 2022 Site Supporter Share Posted May 18, 2022 Jake Daniel’s sounds like bourbon you’d buy at Aldi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burndens Bogs Posted May 18, 2022 Share Posted May 18, 2022 Andre Arse havin’ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators Zico Posted May 18, 2022 Moderators Share Posted May 18, 2022 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Breightmet Boy Posted May 18, 2022 Share Posted May 18, 2022 23 hours ago, gonzo said: Steve Faggot Could of said Gerry, now he could get stuck in with his hard tackle... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Farrelli Posted May 19, 2022 Share Posted May 19, 2022 14 hours ago, Spider said: Jake Daniel’s sounds like bourbon you’d buy at Aldi Chris Woodpecker Mickey Gin Frank Worthingtons Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Breightmet Boy Posted May 19, 2022 Share Posted May 19, 2022 Spurtie Mee (said to Don Revie) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gonk Posted May 19, 2022 Share Posted May 19, 2022 (edited) 19 hours ago, embankment said: It's a Lemmy It's a Dean Martin - that's what Lemmy would have called it Edited May 19, 2022 by Gonk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.