Transfer Gossip

[Rival Son]

5 minutes ago, Whitesince63 said:

Yes really good news for Ollie but isn’t he normally more of a Centre Back than a Wing Back and was just fitting in there? At least it proves his flexibility either way so good luck to the lad.

Not a wing back: a right back. Both his appearances for us have been at right back. And he showed all the attributes to be an effective right back. Defensively solid and plenty of energy moving up and down in support of the right winger. Dare I say it, a little like Max Conway, on the left hand side.

[Whitesince63]

4 minutes ago, Rival Son said:

Not a wing back: a right back. Both his appearances for us have been at right back. And he showed all the attributes to be an effective right back. Defensively solid and plenty of energy moving up and down in support of the right winger. Dare I say it, a little like Max Conway, on the left hand side.

Sorry RV yes you’re correct Right Back not Wing Back my mistake. I agree he looks really comfortable in that position so hopefully he will come on as well as Max has done.

[burnden]

 

[paulhanley]

1 hour ago, burnden said:

 

Pleased about that. It is a tough league with a queue of ex league teams battling it out, he will learn his trade like Max Conway did and get used to the weekly treadmill of senior football. 

Clearly we have forgiven Aldershot after 1987! 🙂

Edited October 30, 2025 by paulhanley

[Johnnyrotten]

1 hour ago, paulhanley said:

Pleased about that. It is a tough league with a queue of ex league teams battling it out, he will learn his trade like Max Conway did and get used to the weekly treadmill of senior football. 

Clearly we have forgiven Aldershot after 1987! 🙂

John Coleman is the new manager apparently, maybe he knows his fellow scouser SS (or more likely doesn't). 

[Tonge moor green jacket]

2 hours ago, paulhanley said:

Pleased about that. It is a tough league with a queue of ex league teams battling it out, he will learn his trade like Max Conway did and get used to the weekly treadmill of senior football. 

Clearly we have forgiven Aldershot after 1987! 🙂

Ah, not the same club technically speaking, so we've had our revenge in a way.

They went tits up and re-formed in 1992.

This new club then went into administration in 2013, but we're rescued by a new owner.

Suppose it's like Accrington & Accrington Stanley. 

[Dr. Feelgood]

3 hours ago, paulhanley said:

Clearly we have forgiven Aldershot after 1987! 🙂

Fckg haven't.  Bastards.

[Rival Son]

2 hours ago, Tonge moor green jacket said:

Suppose it's like Accrington & Accrington Stanley.

I have to correct this point, because so many people incorrectly believe Accrington Stanley were a successor or phoenix club of Accrington.

Accrington were founder members of the Football League in 1888. In 1893 they finished 15th of 16 in Division One and were relegated. * Rather than join Division Two, the club resigned from the league and were disbanded in 1896.

Accrington Stanley were founded in 1891. Therefore, the two Accrington clubs coexisted for 5 years until Accrington disbanded. Stanley eventually joined the Football League in 1920, when Division Three (North) was created.

This matters to me because I’m rightly proud of our history and founder member status. I get frustrated when I see founder member lists showing Accrington Stanley. It’s incorrect.

I also get (less) frustrated when I see Stoke City in the list. The city of Stoke was only created in 1925 (five years after Stanley joined the league). At the foundation of the league, the club was simply called Stoke. However, Stoke City are the same club, with a name change.

* The team that finished 16th, and below Accrington, in 1893 were Newton Heath. If only …

Edited October 30, 2025 by Rival Son

[gonzo]

Google got it right Sonny

[Tonge moor green jacket]

8 hours ago, Rival Son said:

I have to correct this point, because so many people incorrectly believe Accrington Stanley were a successor or phoenix club of Accrington.

Accrington were founder members of the Football League in 1888. In 1893 they finished 15th of 16 in Division One and were relegated. * Rather than join Division Two, the club resigned from the league and were disbanded in 1896.

Accrington Stanley were founded in 1891. Therefore, the two Accrington clubs coexisted for 5 years until Accrington disbanded. Stanley eventually joined the Football League in 1920, when Division Three (North) was created.

This matters to me because I’m rightly proud of our history and founder member status. I get frustrated when I see founder member lists showing Accrington Stanley. It’s incorrect.

I also get (less) frustrated when I see Stoke City in the list. The city of Stoke was only created in 1925 (five years after Stanley joined the league). At the foundation of the league, the club was simply called Stoke. However, Stoke City are the same club, with a name change.

* The team that finished 16th, and below Accrington, in 1893 were Newton Heath. If only …

Fair point there.

Were they both league teams though, or were Stanley effectively just a lower level club that just happened to be in the right place to take up the slack after the demise of the initial team?

[Rival Son]

Accrington Stanley didn’t join the league for another 27 years after Accrington left. They didn’t take up any slack after the original club left the league and then disbanded a few years later. One’s demise and the others rise to league status were unrelated events.

[Wanderlust]

It’s a moot point about name changes. Just as we were previously called Christ Church and the club doesn’t recognise that when it comes to putting the year on scarves etc, there is substantial evidence that a team representing Bolton has played competitive games even much further back and attracting enormous crowds  - even in times preceding the modern rules - and playing against teams representing other towns in the north west including Blackburn and Preston. 
I guess it’s a matter of what you want to decide counts, but there is press coverage of games played in the 1840s.

[Whitesince63]

Back to the Inwood move, it’s just a shame he’s joining an obviously poor struggling side rather than a winning one in Crewe as Max Conway did. Hopefully Coleman will improve them and they’ll move up the league.

[Rival Son]

2 hours ago, Whitesince63 said:

Back to the Inwood move, it’s just a shame he’s joining an obviously poor struggling side rather than a winning one in Crewe as Max Conway did. Hopefully Coleman will improve them and they’ll move up the league.

Thanks for getting us (me) back on track. I think this is a really good opportunity for Inwood to show what he offers.

Despite their lowly position, Aldershot Town are the 4th highest scorers in the National League, with 29 goals. They clearly carry a threat going forward.

Their problem is at the back, where they’ve conceded 35 goals: 2nd highest in the league. If Inwood can help shore up this defence, Aldershot could move up the league very quickly.

An opportunity to shine, and make a name for himself.

[jmjhb]

Coleman has a good record of developing youth too, it's a decent move for Sam

[Duck Egg]

4 hours ago, Whitesince63 said:

Back to the Inwood move, it’s just a shame he’s joining an obviously poor struggling side rather than a winning one in Crewe as Max Conway did. Hopefully Coleman will improve them and they’ll move up the league.

Conway went to Buxton, Rochdale and Fyde before he joined Crewe. This is a good move for Inwood.

[Whitesince63]

3 hours ago, Rival Son said:

Thanks for getting us (me) back on track. I think this is a really good opportunity for Inwood to show what he offers.

Despite their lowly position, Aldershot Town are the 4th highest scorers in the National League, with 29 goals. They clearly carry a threat going forward.

Their problem is at the back, where they’ve conceded 35 goals: 2nd highest in the league. If Inwood can help shore up this defence, Aldershot could move up the league very quickly.

An opportunity to shine, and make a name for himself.

Thanks for clarifying R/S, I didn’t know that just that the Shots were near the bottom so as you say if Sam can help stop the goals it could be a cracking move. I wish him well and hope SSA can now get a similar situation to develop him too?

[Rizlar]

Randall Williams short term deal at Reading.

[Whitesince63]

2 hours ago, Rizlar said:

Randall Williams short term deal at Reading.

Should play tonight against Stevenage do let’s hope he has a good one?

[Dr. Feelgood]

2 minutes ago, Whitesince63 said:

Should play tonight against Stevenage do let’s hope he has a good one?

Injures two, gets another sent off and their manager is banished for his misbehaviour leading to a touchline ban & a Reading win.

Any odds ?

[little whitt]

[Didledee]

remember Dioufy was on a bit of a drought when he came and it took Anelka some time to get his first, think Shearer through a spell of not scoring for England, anymore obvious ones? Forlan at Utd, Crouch at Liverpool.

not quite League 1 though ⬆️

Edited November 6, 2025 by Didledee

[Johnnyrotten]

1 hour ago, Didledee said:

remember Dioufy was on a bit of a drought when he came and it took Anelka some time to get his first, think Shearer through a spell of not scoring for England, anymore obvious ones? Forlan at Utd, Crouch at Liverpool.

not quite League 1 though ⬆️

Diouff went 40 games without scoring for Liverpool/us combined (I looked it up).  Benteke a recent one, at Palace, 25 games.  Berahino 48 game drought at Stoke!  Plays in the Slovenian 2nd division now.

[Dr. Feelgood]

3 hours ago, Didledee said:

remember Dioufy was on a bit of a drought when he came and it took Anelka some time to get his first, think Shearer through a spell of not scoring for England, anymore obvious ones? Forlan at Utd, Crouch at Liverpool.

not quite League 1 though ⬆️

Torres when he went to Chelsea.

[passmosster]

Impressed with how Luke Hutchinson's doing at 

altrincham.