Jump to content
Wanderers Ways. Neil Thompson 1961-2021

Recommended Posts

  • Site Supporter
Posted
24 minutes ago, BobyBrno said:

Giants of the news industry for sure. You might as well quote Bolton news.

This is a story from years ago when folk were rightly aggrieved and now turned on it's head for simple folk to pick up.

I don't consider you simple at all so why the push?

Posted
49 minutes ago, Ani said:

How much does it cost to buy a politicians silence ? Article says they are delaying announcement not cancelling the investment. 
 

Are we meant to get angry about the Govt calling out bad practice by corporates ? As I say what is the cut off ? How much do you have to be investing for the Govt to turn a blind eye ? 

800 jobs I would say

Posted
14 minutes ago, Winchester White said:

Giants of the news industry for sure. You might as well quote Bolton news.

This is a story from years ago when folk were rightly aggrieved and now turned on it's head for simple folk to pick up.

I don't consider you simple at all so why the push?

Not a clue what you’re talking about. I posted a link to a story. You can believe it or not. I really don’t care. 

  • Members
Posted
11 minutes ago, Winchester White said:

This is a story from years ago when folk were rightly aggrieved and now turned on it's head for simple folk to pick up.

Nah, it's not

It's current because employment law is about to be changed as a result of that incident, and the quotes from Rayner and Haigh were made this week

Posted
1 hour ago, Cheese said:

What has she even said? Sacking British workers and hiring cheap foreign labour to replace them is bad?

Yes but Haigh and Raynor should keep silent about bad practices and UK workers being shafted because it may upset some Dubai folk.

Posted
2 minutes ago, gonzo said:

Yes but Haigh and Raynor should keep silent about bad practices and UK workers being shafted because it may upset some Dubai folk.

Well yes but the government were encouraging them and the dissent (which I agree with by the way) has caused either a pause or cancellation of the investment and a rift in the government. That is  the point. 

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Winchester White said:

Giants of the news industry for sure. You might as well quote Bolton news.

This is a story from years ago when folk were rightly aggrieved and now turned on it's head for simple folk to pick up.

I don't consider you simple at all so why the push?

Its. Sharpen up, for fuck’s sake. 🙄

Edited by Zulu
  • Members
Posted
12 hours ago, fatolive said:

You passengers on the bus won’t 😄

Not 'the job' I had in mind but recycling Bernard Manning jokes is always encouraged ;)

Posted
5 hours ago, BobyBrno said:

The latest date of the next election is actually August 2029. So over five years. 5 years of you posting the same thing. Nothing changes. 😊

You’ll get bored before me 😁

  • Members
Posted (edited)
6 hours ago, BobyBrno said:

Gobby Ang. strikes again. 
 

6 hours ago, BobyBrno said:

 

Thought it was Louise Haigh? Makes no difference. They had to mark 100 days in government with one of their usual nefarious 'achievements'.

Just normal service being continued.

Edited by bolty58
  • Members
Posted
5 hours ago, Lt. Aldo Raine said:

Rayner isn't slowly being marginalised, she's rapidly been marginalised

She has a propensity to put her foot in it, but DP World haven't pulled their investment because of what she's said

Anyone who couldn't see that she has challenges has challenges themselves.

A fucking embarrassment - not just to the UK but to the north of England.

DP? No, leave me out if it's her.

  • Members
Posted
3 hours ago, gonzo said:

Yes but Haigh and Raynor should keep silent 

If you would have stopped there you would be getting a 'like' from me.

A dangerous pair of sinister slags.

Posted
8 hours ago, bolty58 said:

Thought it was Louise Haigh? Makes no difference. They had to mark 100 days in government with one of their usual nefarious 'achievements'.

Just normal service being continued.

Yep. Certainly BBC Breakfast News think so. It was their headline this morning with no mention of Rayner. I was going off the SKY link I read and posted.👍

‘In a press release issued with Ms Rayner, Ms Haigh said P&O's actions were "a national scandal" and Ms Rayner described it as "an outrageous example of manipulation by an employer".

  • Members
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, gonzo said:

No interest.

I don't remember him insulting huge potential investors shortly before a positive announcement.

Another thing, the two fat fuckers should abandon those repulsive emerald green windsock pants. Half Shrek job.

Edited by bolty58
  • Site Supporter
Posted
15 hours ago, BobyBrno said:

Maybe this government shouldn’t have invited them to the summit then but they did. Ang. and Haigh have put paid to that. 

Maybe.

There is a suggestion that Starmer hadn't been in the loop so to speak though, and maybe had he been, he'd have made sure no such comments were made.

We'll see.

  • Site Supporter
Posted
14 hours ago, Lt. Aldo Raine said:

 

But regardless, the investment has been paused because of the incoming change to employment law

Whilst that may be true, I've seen no report to that effect. Would make sense in fairness 

Simply a comment that the chairman of the company was responsible for the decision.

 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, BobyBrno said:

Yep. Certainly BBC Breakfast News think so. It was their headline this morning with no mention of Rayner. I was going off the SKY link I read and posted.👍

‘In a press release issued with Ms Rayner, Ms Haigh said P&O's actions were "a national scandal" and Ms Rayner described it as "an outrageous example of manipulation by an employer".

The interviews on the Today programme was a lot more insightful. Good that P&O  are actually stating to do something to follow in line with the new seafarers regulations - as set out with cross-party support, despite the politicking from the likes of Hollinrake.

Certainly naive comments in the interview, and some new cabinet ministers need to understand that their words carry far more weight than in opposition - and on the eve of a large business junket. However, the broader issue that P&O ferries working practices were unacceptable and are having the get their ship in order (pun intended) is correct. The Dubai -based DP world threatening to pull investment because you are called out on how your subsiduary does business, and the Sultan not attending the conference (and this is a chairman who refuses to apologise for P&O's failures remember) cannot be simply a sword of Damocles to allow firms to do what they want whatever the amount or cost to worker's rights. 

Again, its poor comms, which one hopes they now get a grip on.

Posted

It's all a bit silly this isn't it? Daft thing to say, and a really childish move by a company that already looked like a bunch of slimy shitbags for their behaviour over the past couple of years. 

  • Site Supporter
Posted

We’ve seemingly moved on quickly from calling them out for “bribes” I notice.

Weird that

  • Site Supporter
Posted
2 minutes ago, Winchester White said:

Now the head of DP World is going after all.

Surely not!?! That would make it seem like a confected outrage organised and cheered on by right-wing chauvanists?

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.