anthonyj Posted March 25, 2019 Posted March 25, 2019 Surely this confirms there are no plans for admin?
Chrisj Posted March 25, 2019 Posted March 25, 2019 14 minutes ago, Howardroark said: I think it’s 50/50 at this stage Do you think a deal will be done before next court date though Howard
TrickyTrotter Posted March 25, 2019 Posted March 25, 2019 Can't see that anyone else has posted this. It is worth a read about what new owners are letting themselves in for. https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/47691385 Rovers lost £17.5m in L1 last season 17 Championship clubs who have reported so far have losses totalling £366m, with Fulham, Sunderland, Sheffield Wednesday, Brentford, Derby and Bolton still to report
Guest Posted March 25, 2019 Posted March 25, 2019 2 minutes ago, ZicoKelly said: Were ok, KA said we're set to make a small profit After expenses....
Howardroark Posted March 25, 2019 Posted March 25, 2019 58 minutes ago, Chrisj said: Do you think a deal will be done before next court date though Howard Yes
Ani Posted March 25, 2019 Posted March 25, 2019 5 minutes ago, Howardroark said: Yes Howard I asked earlier do you know who the bidders are ? And is UK based accurate ?
e2e4 Posted March 25, 2019 Posted March 25, 2019 https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/47691385 look at bristol city .. no ones querying their future once their owner goes away. the words bristol city arent even mentoned in the article. amongst all the bar graphs and total lack of top flight football in the recent past. fucking hell its only five minutes ago when people were bucket shaking for brighton (at doncasters expense , who BTW were being fucked over by a crook at the time) because they got to an fa cup final once. Also wanna put this here- https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Administration_(British_football) look at the amount of teams . I'm not really sure what my point is , but this focus on bolton seems funny, when theyve slept on (or cheerleaded for) the likes of brighton , bristol city at various times in the past. bolton have been in the shit moneywise for ages now, why these various economic thinkpieces now ? I didnt give a fuck when Jay Jay were strolling round everyone , dont really give a crap now, sudden scaremongery from various quarters must mean a billionaire is coming..
darrener Posted March 25, 2019 Posted March 25, 2019 1 minute ago, Ani said: Howard I asked earlier do you know who the bidders are ? And is UK based accurate ? I think Howard is getting a bit sick of answering that question, if he /she knew I don't think it would be wise to disclose at this stage
Ani Posted March 25, 2019 Posted March 25, 2019 2 minutes ago, darrener said: I think Howard is getting a bit sick of answering that question, if he /she knew I don't think it would be wise to disclose at this stage Eh ?
Howardroark Posted March 25, 2019 Posted March 25, 2019 16 minutes ago, Ani said: Howard I asked earlier do you know who the bidders are ? And is UK based accurate ? The people that need to know; know Yes UK based is accurate
Ani Posted March 25, 2019 Posted March 25, 2019 7 minutes ago, Howardroark said: The people that need to know; know Yes UK based is accurate Cheers.
Benny The Ball Posted March 25, 2019 Posted March 25, 2019 1 hour ago, TrickyTrotter said: Can't see that anyone else has posted this. It is worth a read about what new owners are letting themselves in for. https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/47691385 Rovers lost £17.5m in L1 last season 17 Championship clubs who have reported so far have losses totalling £366m, with Fulham, Sunderland, Sheffield Wednesday, Brentford, Derby and Bolton still to report Thanks for pointing this out - just had a read Just looking at the graph of Bolton players costs as a % of income is pretty scary stuff We may be lucky and get bought out just in time , but there are only a finite number of people with the means to invest in football clubs and the wider this income divide between premiership and championship clubs grows , its surely only a matter of time before some club goes to the wall From our perspective a couple of years in league one might prove to be a godsend in the long run
Chris Custodiet Posted March 26, 2019 Posted March 26, 2019 (edited) We all would have liked to have seen this resolved weeks, or better still months ago, but brinkmanship is usually two-sided. If Ken's a greedy so and so he's not short of company in professional football and, from what H says, Ken isn't holding out for a lot in the wider context. Maybe the devil's in the detail. WW is free of FIBS (Firth, Iles, Bower and Shortland) but not devoid of anti-Anderson sentiment and I can't be the only one wondering why H chose WW to brief against Anderson (and Basran) when there are potentially bigger audiences on Facebook and Twitter. Edited March 26, 2019 by Chris Custodiet
Kane57 Posted March 26, 2019 Author Posted March 26, 2019 4 minutes ago, Chris Custodiet said: We all would have liked to have seen this resolved weeks, or better still months ago, but brinkmanship is usually two-sided. If Ken's a greedy so and so he's not short of company in professional football and, from what H says, Ken isn't holding out for a lot in the wider context. Maybe the devil's in the detail. WW is free of FIBS (Firth, Iles, Bower and Shortland) but not devoid of anti-Anderson sentiment and I can't be the only one wondering why H chose WW to brief against Anderson (and Basran) when there are potentially bigger audiences on Facebook and Twitter. I've read some mental things from you in the past but you've reached a new level with that
bolty58 Posted March 26, 2019 Posted March 26, 2019 6 minutes ago, Chris Custodiet said: We all would have liked to have seen this resolved weeks, or better still months ago, but brinkmanship is usually two-sided. If Ken's a greedy so and so he's not short of company in professional football and, from what H says, Ken isn't holding out for a lot in the wider context. Maybe the devil's in the detail. WW is free of FIBS (Firth, Iles, Bower and Shortland) but not devoid of anti-Anderson sentiment and I can't be the only one wondering why H chose WW to brief against Anderson (and Basran) when there are potentially bigger audiences on Facebook and Twitter. Because this is where the true believers hang out?
gonzo Posted March 26, 2019 Posted March 26, 2019 https://www.theboltonnews.co.uk/sport/17526317.bolton-west-mp-wades-into-wanderers-ownership-issue/
Chris Custodiet Posted March 26, 2019 Posted March 26, 2019 (edited) 44 minutes ago, Kane57 said: I've read some mental things from you in the past but you've reached a new level with that I was really thinking about takeover negotiations but if I change the word usually to frequently would you like to expand on any other bits you think are incorrect? Edited March 26, 2019 by Chris Custodiet
DirtySanchez Posted March 26, 2019 Posted March 26, 2019 38 minutes ago, Chris Custodiet said: We all would have liked to have seen this resolved weeks, or better still months ago, but brinkmanship is usually two-sided. If Ken's a greedy so and so he's not short of company in professional football and, from what H says, Ken isn't holding out for a lot in the wider context. Maybe the devil's in the detail. WW is free of FIBS (Firth, Iles, Bower and Shortland) but not devoid of anti-Anderson sentiment and I can't be the only one wondering why H chose WW to brief against Anderson (and Basran) when there are potentially bigger audiences on Facebook and Twitter. Maybe he doesn't do Facebook or Twitter?
Traf Posted March 26, 2019 Posted March 26, 2019 As we're all guessing, maybe Howard looked at Facebook, Twitter and a load of other forums, before deciding this was the most balanced/reasoned? Even when people disagree on here, they explain why. (before offering a straightener, of course)
Steejay Posted March 26, 2019 Posted March 26, 2019 57 minutes ago, Chris Custodiet said: We all would have liked to have seen this resolved weeks, or better still months ago, but brinkmanship is usually two-sided. If Ken's a greedy so and so he's not short of company in professional football and, from what H says, Ken isn't holding out for a lot in the wider context. Maybe the devil's in the detail. WW is free of FIBS (Firth, Iles, Bower and Shortland) but not devoid of anti-Anderson sentiment and I can't be the only one wondering why H chose WW to brief against Anderson (and Basran) when there are potentially bigger audiences on Facebook and Twitter. Well, why the fuck are you on here??? There must be a reason. You left once but decided to return - why was that? I think it may be because yes, there are conflicting views about everything that's going on but there aren't the mindless levels of shite that you find on FB/Twitter. There are also many reasoned comments amongst all the tits & banter that you'll find wherever guys congregate, whether they be accountants, PR's, teachers, brickies etc. So fucking patronising of you...
Popular Post Carlos Posted March 26, 2019 Popular Post Posted March 26, 2019 Ww is what, 20 years old? Please don’t come on here after all these years and tell us how to run our site. If you don’t like it, log off and head elsewhere.
Popular Post MickyD Posted March 26, 2019 Popular Post Posted March 26, 2019 1 minute ago, Carlos said: Ww is what, 20 years old? Please don’t come on here after all these years and tell us how to run our site. If you don’t like it, log off and head elsewhere. Interesting that we're still on rude words being auto-changed. Fuck Fuck No, maybe not.
Spider Posted March 26, 2019 Posted March 26, 2019 1 hour ago, Chris Custodiet said: We all would have liked to have seen this resolved weeks, or better still months ago, but brinkmanship is usually two-sided. If Ken's a greedy so and so he's not short of company in professional football and, from what H says, Ken isn't holding out for a lot in the wider context. Maybe the devil's in the detail. WW is free of FIBS (Firth, Iles, Bower and Shortland) but not devoid of anti-Anderson sentiment and I can't be the only one wondering why H chose WW to brief against Anderson (and Basran) when there are potentially bigger audiences on Facebook and Twitter. I guarantee that once the takeover saga is complete, we’ll hardly ever hear from you. You chose WW to vomit your nonsense onto, I assume because you’ve clocked that the debate is fairly level headed and reasonable, and you got a bit sick of the us va them mentality of twitterbook.
Recommended Posts