Moderators Zico Posted August 3, 2017 Moderators Share Posted August 3, 2017 made us chuckle Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frank_spencer Posted August 3, 2017 Share Posted August 3, 2017 Made me chuckle too, the mail/express etc wanted tighter border controls so what's the issue? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tyldesley_white Posted August 3, 2017 Share Posted August 3, 2017 But that's was only our borders, we were still supposed to travel freely ( or that what some people thought ) ... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miamiwhite Posted August 3, 2017 Author Share Posted August 3, 2017 Avoid the queues...fly to Africa, then come by ferry to Italy....no checks for them lot......... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mounts Kipper Posted August 7, 2017 Share Posted August 7, 2017 http://brexitcentral.com/time-turn-tables-blair-et-al-exactly-now-return-euro-swamp/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members bolty58 Posted August 8, 2017 Members Share Posted August 8, 2017 Fought a war to avoid being under the German heel and now Bliar and his limp dicked accomplices want to meekly accept their economic domination. No surrender. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leigh white Posted August 27, 2017 Share Posted August 27, 2017 Scargill's take on Brexit.The Socialist Labour Party warned that the Labour Party would betray not only it's members but betray the democratic vote by the British people to leave the European Union. As soon as that vote was announced on the 23 June 2016 Britain should have left the EU immediately, including; the customs union; The single market; and above all "the free movement of labour and capital" which as seen the population in Britain rise from 59 million to 67 million. The UK should not pay a penny or Euro to the EU. If the border in Ireland is a concern the solution is a simple one return the North of Ireland back to the republic from where it was taken.Arthur Scargill Leader "Socialist Labour Party" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghana White Posted August 27, 2017 Share Posted August 27, 2017 Do people still care what scargill thinks? He did more damage to the minors then Thatcher then fucked off to his mansion whilst they still pay off the debts from the strike. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leigh white Posted August 27, 2017 Share Posted August 27, 2017 Do people still care what scargill thinks? He did more damage to the minors then Thatcher then fucked off to his mansion whilst they still pay off the debts from the strike. He just warned us of the decimation of the mining industry in 84, all in all, he was telling the truth. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators Casino Posted August 28, 2017 Moderators Share Posted August 28, 2017 He's a cnut Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members bolty58 Posted August 28, 2017 Members Share Posted August 28, 2017 He's a cnut with a shocking comb over Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweep Posted August 28, 2017 Share Posted August 28, 2017 If the border in Ireland is a concern the solution is a simple one return the North of Ireland back to the republic from where it was taken.[/font][/color] Arthur Scargill Leader "Socialist Labour Party" What a dick As said above by Ghana, does anybody really care what Scargill says these days? Apart from the "woe is me" ex-miners who are still bleating on about how hard done by they were 30+ years ago, it really is time they moved on, once they do then Scargill will lose any sort of platform he has. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter Tonge moor green jacket Posted August 28, 2017 Site Supporter Share Posted August 28, 2017 Do people still care what scargill thinks? He did more damage to the minors then Thatcher then fucked off to his mansion whilst they still pay off the debts from the strike. Paedophile? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gonzo Posted September 12, 2017 Share Posted September 12, 2017 So all those laws everybody wanted rid of are coming over to British law lock stock and barrel anyway?? It would be hilarious if wasn't so tragic. What a waste of everybody's time this all really is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H Posted September 12, 2017 Share Posted September 12, 2017 Then they can bee looked at and smended/repealed as necessary. If we looked at each one individually before transfer most of us would be dead before the process was concluded. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gonzo Posted September 12, 2017 Share Posted September 12, 2017 Then they can bee looked at and smended/repealed as necessary. Name one Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter Tonge moor green jacket Posted September 12, 2017 Site Supporter Share Posted September 12, 2017 Its a legal and economic necessity though. Allows the wheels to keep turning. Ministers can then alter them accordingly. Apparently. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter Spider Posted September 12, 2017 Site Supporter Share Posted September 12, 2017 Name one Fishing We can sink French and Spanish ships that try and catch our cods and pollocks. But, we're allowed to send our brave heroes in wooly hats into the Bay of Biscay and there's nothing Pierre or Esteban can do about it. Next. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ani Posted September 12, 2017 Share Posted September 12, 2017 So we now have control of our laws. Except now Ministers can make changes without going back through parliament. So 'us' getting control actually means Ministers and we have reduced power of our elected parliament. But no need to worry they won't abuse the power. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweep Posted September 12, 2017 Share Posted September 12, 2017 So all those laws everybody wanted rid of . remind me again, which are the laws in particular that people don't want? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MalcolmW Posted September 12, 2017 Share Posted September 12, 2017 So all those laws everybody wanted rid of are coming over to British law lock stock and barrel anyway?? It would be hilarious if wasn't so tragic. What a waste of everybody's time this all really is. That was always going to be the case. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MalcolmW Posted September 12, 2017 Share Posted September 12, 2017 Name one The one which equalises annuity rates for males and females, even though all data collected over more than a century indicates that, on average, females live longer than males and will continue to do so for another century. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MalcolmW Posted September 12, 2017 Share Posted September 12, 2017 remind me again, which are the laws in particular that people don't want? It's actually not the laws, rather the judges who interpret them. Some of these would meet the standard for judicial appointments in the UK and some would not. Some are political appointees, so no wonder their judgements are sometimes conveniently perverse. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter Tonge moor green jacket Posted September 12, 2017 Site Supporter Share Posted September 12, 2017 So we now have control of our laws. Except now Ministers can make changes without going back through parliament. So 'us' getting control actually means Ministers and we have reduced power of our elected parliament. But no need to worry they won't abuse the power. Not sure its quite as simple as that. All this is way over my swede, but a chap on the box a few weeks ago explained it as being a necessary 'temporary' measure whilst the unique situation is addressed. From what he was saying, I got the impression that once we'd left parliament would then be able to revisit stuff as necessary. It just needed doing quickly with ministers making initial alterations as necessary to prepare for the leaving date. That said its a minefield, and if it was shown that an abuse of power was indeed going on, then a weakish government may well be fucked Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter Spider Posted September 12, 2017 Site Supporter Share Posted September 12, 2017 Chat as much shit as you want This is a good old fashioned negotiation with one party wanting an amount of money, and the other party determined to give away as little as possible. Like everything, it boils down to money and sex. Which means one of the parties will end up fucked and skint. Over to you, Mr Davies. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.