Site Supporter Tonge moor green jacket Posted May 28, 2019 Site Supporter Share Posted May 28, 2019 Not sure it's been mentioned, but did anyone read Harvey's comments the other day about how clubs treat their owners? Wonder if he holidays in Monaco? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wigan White pt2 Posted May 28, 2019 Share Posted May 28, 2019 39 minutes ago, Tonge moor green jacket said: Not sure it's been mentioned, but did anyone read Harvey's comments the other day about how clubs treat their owners? Wonder if he holidays in Monaco? Harvey is a first class cunt on a par with Anderson. Just shows how little understanding the EFL have in all this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoadRunnerFan Posted May 28, 2019 Share Posted May 28, 2019 1 hour ago, Sluffy said: Assume this is aimed at me? If so I've not been on this forum for a period of time until some months back so you've clearly not been following my work on here. The only other place I posted during Anderson's ownership is at Nuts, so I guess you must be referring to there. For what it matters I've never been 'angry' with anyone, even in real life, I'm a bit of a cold fish if truth be told, I'm certainly far more cerebral and analytical, than hot-head and emotional. This manifests itself in to how I act and behave, namely rationally, sensibly, responsibly, etc And they showed you a world where you could be so dependable. Oh clinical, oh intellectual, cynical. Bet you prefer the Sccoter version to the Supertramp one on the sly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators Zico Posted May 28, 2019 Moderators Share Posted May 28, 2019 2 hours ago, Tonge moor green jacket said: Not sure it's been mentioned, but did anyone read Harvey's comments the other day about how clubs treat their owners? Wonder if he holidays in Monaco? defintely Team Ken https://www.nottinghampost.com/sport/football/football-news/football-must-look-how-treats-2912672 "So, we are reliant on owners and football needs to look at how it treats the owners at some of its clubs. Fans not happy about the investment that is going into their club. Trust me, without them (the owners), they wouldn’t have a club.” https://www.burndenaces.co.uk/2019/02/25/efl-chief-thanks-outgoing-bolton-chairman.html "He has put it into a position where a lot of the debt has gone." https://www.theboltonnews.co.uk/sport/17565956.bolton-supporters-trust-seek-answers-from-efl-chief-shaun-harvey/ "the EFl remain satisfied the club has the source and sufficiency of funds to meets its obligations as a member of the league to at least the end of the season." did I dream this or wasn't he meant to have his EFL leaving do at KA's son's restaurant? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BIGBW Posted May 28, 2019 Share Posted May 28, 2019 4 hours ago, ZicoKelly said: defintely Team Ken https://www.nottinghampost.com/sport/football/football-news/football-must-look-how-treats-2912672 "So, we are reliant on owners and football needs to look at how it treats the owners at some of its clubs. Fans not happy about the investment that is going into their club. Trust me, without them (the owners), they wouldn’t have a club.” https://www.burndenaces.co.uk/2019/02/25/efl-chief-thanks-outgoing-bolton-chairman.html "He has put it into a position where a lot of the debt has gone." https://www.theboltonnews.co.uk/sport/17565956.bolton-supporters-trust-seek-answers-from-efl-chief-shaun-harvey/ "the EFl remain satisfied the club has the source and sufficiency of funds to meets its obligations as a member of the league to at least the end of the season." did I dream this or wasn't he meant to have his EFL leaving do at KA's son's restaurant? There was a newspaper article saying the leaving do was at one of Ken's restaurants, but the restaurant mentioned was actually not owned by Ken or his family. Not sure if it as a mistake or if the story had been made up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tomski Posted May 29, 2019 Share Posted May 29, 2019 6 hours ago, BIGBW said: There was a newspaper article saying the leaving do was at one of Ken's restaurants, but the restaurant mentioned was actually not owned by Ken or his family. Not sure if it as a mistake or if the story had been made up. Ken is a shareholder in the restaurant questioned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mantra Posted May 29, 2019 Share Posted May 29, 2019 Nixon saying 5 groups have paid 25k to look at the books. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Banks Posted May 29, 2019 Share Posted May 29, 2019 Which means that at least four have chucked away £25k 😂😂 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Breightmet Boy Posted May 29, 2019 Share Posted May 29, 2019 26 minutes ago, Tommy Banks said: Which means that at least four have chucked away £25k 😂😂 Which is like me or you putting a couple of coppers into a slot in a little boys head outside a shop. Petty cash to these kinds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TroySwoosh Posted May 29, 2019 Share Posted May 29, 2019 Don't they get it back if their bid is not successful? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter Cheese Posted May 29, 2019 Site Supporter Share Posted May 29, 2019 5 minutes ago, TroySwoosh said: Don't they get it back if their bid is not successful? The opposite. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DomRepWanderer Posted May 29, 2019 Share Posted May 29, 2019 9 minutes ago, TroySwoosh said: Don't they get it back if their bid is not successful? Think they said refunded to only the successful bidder. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wanderlust Posted May 29, 2019 Share Posted May 29, 2019 It's designed to scare off time wasters. If they refunded the money it wouldn't work would it? I just hope that the alleged number of interested parties doesn't mean that a bidding war will kick off again where the only criterion is who will front the most money rather than considering what's the best bid for the long term future of the club. Hopefully the administrators will bear that in mind rather than solely looking at the short term gains for the creditors. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bwfcfan5 Posted May 29, 2019 Share Posted May 29, 2019 4 minutes ago, Hoppy510 said: It's designed to scare off time wasters. If they refunded the money it wouldn't work would it? I just hope that the alleged number of interested parties doesn't mean that a bidding war will kick off again where the only criterion is who will front the most money rather than considering what's the best bid for the long term future of the club. Hopefully the administrators will bear that in mind rather than solely looking at the short term gains for the creditors. If you can't front the money then why would you be best for the long term future of the club? There is a process and timetable laid out. If a buyer cannot find the funds or prove their existence and satisfy the EFL in that well advertised timeline then its buh-bye. Regardless of their "intentions". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TroySwoosh Posted May 29, 2019 Share Posted May 29, 2019 19 minutes ago, Cheese said: The opposite. 15 minutes ago, DomRepWanderer said: Think they said refunded to only the successful bidder. Well then I think I need to change profession! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Take Hunt Off Posted May 29, 2019 Share Posted May 29, 2019 I know the caveat in this is Nixon but surely five interested is better than two? Especially since one has hardly a pot to piss in . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MalcolmW Posted May 29, 2019 Share Posted May 29, 2019 One paying £25M is better than 1,000 paying £25k but no-one buying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Traf Posted May 29, 2019 Share Posted May 29, 2019 2 hours ago, MalcolmW said: One paying £25M is better than 1,000 paying £25k but no-one buying. both would be better Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burndens Bogs Posted May 29, 2019 Share Posted May 29, 2019 Probably be no-one paying £25m and five paying £25k. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZiggyStardust Posted May 29, 2019 Share Posted May 29, 2019 1 hour ago, Traf said: both would be better The club will never see the 25k will they, administrators will keep it as a fee. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Banks Posted May 29, 2019 Share Posted May 29, 2019 8 minutes ago, ZiggyStardust said: The club will never see the 25k will they, administrators will keep it as a fee. Assume that it will go into the kitty for funding administration, although it’s probably a drop in the ocean Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Salford Trotter Posted May 29, 2019 Share Posted May 29, 2019 1 hour ago, Burndens Bogs said: Probably be no-one paying £25m and five paying £25k. Just need another 996 to do the same now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Breightmet Boy Posted May 29, 2019 Share Posted May 29, 2019 For Gods sake stop being so negative chaps. Our town is on its arse, but we’ve still got some of the best businessmen in the world in it. Our club will resurrect, stop being so Mard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Banks Posted May 31, 2019 Share Posted May 31, 2019 As everyone gone on holiday Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUREADY2ROLL Posted May 31, 2019 Share Posted May 31, 2019 No there are still people about Most are bored with this thread and Slutty has got artharitis in his fingers due to the extremely long posts - some have eyesight problems with trying to read them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts