Politics

[tomski]

8 hours ago, gonzo said:

What channel was this?

[gonzo]

1 hour ago, little whitt said:

Us Whites Need to up Our Game 

You've done your bit pal. Rest easy.

[Tonge moor green jacket]

1 hour ago, gonzo said:

You've done your bit pal. Rest easy.

Ouch. 😁

Be careful with that chart: you'll be facing a whole torrent of crap claiming it to be utter bollocks.

Still, if Charlie Perters' specific exposé brings about a positive response then some minds might face a bit of refocusing. 

[Traf]

1 hour ago, tomski said:

What channel was this?

Stinks of GB News

[tomski]

16 minutes ago, Traf said:

Stinks of GB News

😂

[bolty58]

1 hour ago, Traf said:

Stinks of GB News

Would be no surprise just as the league table isn't.

The BBC will be working hard to come up with a counter.

[Casino]

What a vile human being

 

[BobyBrno]

Almost half way through my winter break so thought I’d check up on things back home. Rachel from customer services seems to be in a bit of bother, Burnham has gone ‘far right’ and the Unions have taken over the country! Ah well. Plenty of cricket to take my mind off things.😉

Edited January 10, 2025 by BobyBrno

[bolty58]

Andy Burnham. The only Labour type I could ever imagine myself voting for.

Head and shoulders above Starmer and the rest of the fake working class (chardonnay quaffing) socialists.

Badenoch needn't have said it. Surely every fucker knows by now that a vote for Labour is a vote for the unions running the country? The paymasters direct; Starmer inflicts.

Reeves? Any surprise? This lot would clearly rather kow-tow to a Communist Party than an entrepreneur likely to set new stock exchange value records. It's in their DNA.

[Tonge moor green jacket]

As he become the new David Milliband?

[Winchester White]

Bloody hell @Boby Brno if you think the front page of the Telegraph is actual news from back home then I wouldn't bother returning! 😄

[BobyBrno]

1 minute ago, Winchester White said:

Bloody hell @Boby Brno if you think the front page of the Telegraph is actual news from back home then I wouldn't bother returning! 😄

Ah! The source again. It’s always the source. I gather information from many sources. The least reliable is Wanderesways! 😊

[Spider]

7 hours ago, BobyBrno said:

Almost half way through my winter break so thought I’d check up on things back home. Rachel from customer services seems to be in a bit of bother, Burnham has gone ‘far right’ and the Unions have taken over the country! Ah well. Plenty of cricket to take my mind off things.😉

At least you’re getting a balanced view 

[Guest]

I like Andy Burnham but he’s significantly to the left of the current government. I’m not sure how he’d manage with his desire for extra public service funding and nationalisation given the dreadful economic inheritance the Tories left behind with no scope for borrowing or indeed tax rises. 
 

Maybe Farage is right and that he and Corbyn are quite similar. Or mad Musk and that far right German woman are right that Hitler was really a communist. It’s just that he rounded up and killed all the communists that sort of ruins that theory. But I guess what does a mere fact matter anymore? You can say anything.

 

 

 

[Winchester White]

9 minutes ago, BobyBrno said:

Ah! The source again. It’s always the source. I gather information from many sources. The least reliable is Wanderesways! 😊

Fair enough but you put their three headlines on here as "news" from home. Of course the source is then disputable.

[BobyBrno]

Is the information contained in the source correct?

[kent_white]

6 hours ago, bolty58 said:

Andy Burnham. The only Labour type I could ever imagine myself voting for.

Honestly?

 

10 minutes ago, BobyBrno said:

Is the information contained in the source correct?

1 out of three is yeah - in that Andy Burnham has a different line to the PM. 

Rachel Reeves is on a trip to hopefully improve trade with China - she's not 'missing in action'. The unions haven't 'taken back control' of anything. 

But if you wanted a Conservative mouthpiece - you've gone to the right place! 

Enjoy the cricket! 🏏

[Spider]

37 minutes ago, BobyBrno said:

Is the information contained in the source correct?

How can she be missing in action when she’s in China sorting out new pork markets?

Anyway, some good news for you:

 

[Lt. Aldo Raine]

Just to clarify, Burnham's called for a limited national inquiry only, and it's open to interpretation what that means

But none the less, I suppose it's a step in the right direction

[royal white]

9 minutes ago, Spider said:

How can she be missing in action when she’s in China sorting out new pork markets?

Anyway, some good news for you:

 

I Wonder if this is true

 

 

[Sweep]

51 minutes ago, BobyBrno said:

Is the information contained in the source correct?

I'm not sure that "The Unions" have taken control to be honest

[Spider]

18 minutes ago, royal white said:

I Wonder if this is true

 

 

So, to confirm, they’ve all gone then.

Excellent.

[royal white]

3 minutes ago, Spider said:

So, to confirm, they’ve all gone then.

Excellent.

You’re better than this spider, don’t fall for it! They’re letting more in so it’s easier to find folk to return. Cheese (as expected) fell for it the other week when Labour announced they were closing immigrant hotels……what he failed to mention was Labour had recently started using double the amount of hotels what they had planned to close 

[Cheese]

10 minutes ago, royal white said:

You’re better than this spider, don’t fall for it! They’re letting more in so it’s easier to find folk to return. Cheese (as expected) fell for it the other week when Labour announced they were closing immigrant hotels……what he failed to mention was Labour had recently started using double the amount of hotels what they had planned to close 

Rent free.

[Jol_BWFC]

42 minutes ago, royal white said:

I Wonder if this is true

 

 

I have no idea if it’s true, but if so £3,000 per person is less than £700m for sending 3 people to Rwanda.